Huh. So what's happening is that in RabbitMQ 3.0 we parse and handle the "expiration" property of each message for per-message TTL. Which means we expect it to be an integer. But it looks like MassTransit is sticking something else in there.
MassTransit devs: would it be a big deal to change this behaviour?Cheers, Simon
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/masstransit-discuss/-/ZXjF0mTmT94J.--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "masstransit-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to masstrans...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to masstransit-dis...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to masstransit-discuss+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
Huh. So what's happening is that in RabbitMQ 3.0 we parse and handle the "expiration" property of each message for per-message TTL. Which means we expect it to be an integer. But it looks like MassTransit is sticking something else in there.
MassTransit devs: would it be a big deal to change this behaviour?Cheers, Simon
On Monday, November 19, 2012 5:03:35 PM UTC, Wiebe wrote: