re karen read case - lets make 2 timelines
1. read hits john o'keefe (JOK) - pieces of taillight are left at 34 fairview
2. read hits JOK - no pieces of taillight are left at 34 fairview
case 1 - someone would have stepped on the pieces at 630 am and
noticed them - maybe just one person ...
... from fd or pd mentioned pieces of red and white glass at 34
fairview at 630 am - need to check this out - seem to remember 1
person testifying to this
case 2 - if taillight was intact when read arrived at 1 meadow rd -
she had all night to do something ...
... but why would she? that would just bring negative attention to her
- but the driveway camera clearly shows a big piece of taillight
missing as she drives off - the light from the floodlight shows this
lets try this scenario - higgins punches out jok on lawn - leaves him
for dead - read has no clue - read damages taillight backing out of
garage - someone grabs the pieces at 1 meadow rd and takes them away -
everyone lies about what they saw at 34 Fairview that could work
slightly different scenario - alberts kill jok in 34 fairview - put
body on lawn - put drinking glass pieces on lawn also - read has no
clue - someone grabs the taillight pieces at 1 meadow rd that could
work also
--
shes got a kid ... together -
https://youtu.be/IQQ-hxIwm70?si=8jrwZRcfZg-vN4Ye&t=237