hello, as for the title, yesterday your extension "malwarebytes browser guard" has been marked by the browser with this phrase "This extension may have been corrupted." and also in the store this shows up "This item has been disabled in Chrome." i'm using the brave browser
if you disable the real-time protection of malwarebytes, I think that is OK. Also you can use any scan tool instead of malwarebytes, such as microsoft autoruns or avz tool to check system auto boot object or other object/place related to easy to be make use of malware.
Came across this article explaining how to install malwarebytes on linux. While it obviously sounds counter intuitive to do such a thing, I have had a good experience malwarebytes and the obvious advantage of it monitoring port activity and blocking malicious activity would seem very useful. I know with iptables I could manually block ports but that has always been a pain to me. I don't know if this is a good or bad idea. What do you guys think?
I have had a good experience malwarebytes and the obvious advantage of it monitoring port activity and blocking malicious activity would seem very useful. I know with iptables I could manually block ports but that has always been a pain to me.
We have around 2000+ endpoint licenses, and every comptuer with malwarebytes installed on it is breaking, endpoint thinks malwarebytes is a virus or something, with the two install on the same computer, it breaks web protection in malwarebytes and then you can launch firefox, IE, chrome etc..