· The Celanese Hour version I find a fresh, young and very lyric Mario in good voice. He seems to be almost over deliberate in his phrasing, singing word by word, being very cautious to avoid any “flubs”. Not the usual seamless flow of lyric as from an older more experienced Lanza. Kind of a disjointed ending but overall, very nice. I awarded it three stars.
· The “Coke” version was simply too fast even for a coke program. I thought the tempo distracted from the beautiful melody. Also, his voice was “raspy” in places (too many cigarettes?). I rate it at two and a half stars.
· OMG, what’s not to love in the MGM soundtrack? No singer, including Mario, has ever sung this better! The definitive Serenade. Great color, expression, and perfect cadence. I have always felt this exciting piece was a masterpiece and a song that will always be associated with Mario. Five Stars, hands down!
· How does any singer, including Mario, compete against the above version? The RCA’ 59 was nevertheless, quite good. His voice was darker and maybe richer but there seemed to be less “joy” in his expression. I rate it as good but at three and a half stars.
Best Wishes
Norma
Derek wrote: "Beautiful beyond compare: that's the MGM rendition for me!" For me, too, Derek, and for the same reasons. Your very description spells "masterpiece" for me, which is how I rated this version. In fact, it has been my favorite English song since I first heard it in my early teens, even before I knew or cared who Mario Lanza was.
In my opinion, the MGM recording does not lend itself to comparison with the other three versions because Mr. Webster’s rewritten lyrics make the song a different animal altogether. I daresay that Lanza's delivery would not have been as lyrical, as poetic, or as magical had Ms. Donnelly’s original text been retained. The updated lyrics evoke a vision of young lovers dreamily drifting in a boat on a moonlit river, whereas the original conjure up the classic image of a lovestruck suitor pouring forth his impassioned pleas beneath his beloved's window. (Not very princely, to be sure, but I guess one can always invoke poetic license.) I would imagine that had the original lyrics been left alone, Lanza’s reading of the song would have been more dramatic, more passionate, more visceral. This, in fact, is how his three other versions strike me, in varying degrees.
I find the 1946 live rendition lacking in nuance and dynamics. I get the feeling that Lanza is just mouthing the words, that they don’t quite reach his heart. But oh, the freshness and the youthfulness, the effortless power and the molten-gold quality of that voice! I can’t bring myself to rate this performance lower than 3/5. Incidentally, the much older and seasoned Jan Peerce, whom Lanza was subbing for in “Great Moments in Music,” sang this song in 1947. To my ears, his singing is more polished than young Lanza’s, but it, too, lacks dynamic nuances, and unlike Lanza, he drops the final note.
I do not take the annoyingly
fast tempo of the 1952 Coca Cola version
against Lanza as it was not within his control. The voice has retained the
qualities that I admire in the 1946 performance. The delivery is more secure, polished
and nuanced, and he now employs some lovely soft touches, particularly in “Only you can tell it how, Beloved.” Easily a 3/5.
In the 1959 recording,
Lanza sings the unprincely lyrics in an un-student like voice – dark and
sensual. His character is no sheltered prince in the throes of first love but a
fully mature man who has found a woman to die for. In my opinion, Lanza’s
operatic approach fits the character’s strong emotions like the proverbial
glove. I particularly like the part where, powerless to resist his feelings, he
unleashes a goose bumps-inducing “Oh, love me or I die!” Both Tauber and Gedda
sing this line mezza voce, but I prefer Lanza’s primal scream, which contrasts
dynamically with his meltingly tender “Only you can tell it how, Beloved.” (introduced
in the 1952 Coca Cola version and perfected here). This and the jaw-dropping
high-note ending belie the hint of tiredness in his voice. Taking Lanza’s 1959
rendition out of the Student Prince context, I unhesitatingly and
unapologetically give it a 5/5.
Dear Lee Ann, I'm delighted to know that we are on the same wavelength about Lanza's versions of Serenade. I also enjoyed listening to Richard Crooks's 1930 recording, although I was a bit distracted by the “blending of tracks” in which a second tenor joins him. Incidentally, I've read that Crooks was Romberg's original choice for the role of the prince in the operetta, but that a previous opera commitment prevented the tenor from accepting.
No less than historical performances, I’m also interested in singing-history-in-the- making. One of the contemporary tenors I’m keeping an eye on is the American Charles Castronovo. I don’t think he’s on the radar of most casual listeners yet, but there's a steadily growing international demand for him as a lyric tenor. He sang Romberg’s Serenade at the Proms 2011 and got the biggest ovation from the audience for his “literally heart stopping” performance. Here he is “doing the full Mario,” as one reviewer puts it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kltS8g-qj4
Not exactly a patch on Lanza's singing, but he's no slouch in the looks department, don’t you think? I’m wondering, though, why he chose Donnelly’s over Webster’s lyrics when the theme of the concert was “Hooray for Hollywood.”
Cheers,
Lou