I think it is very naive to think that, only because a letter in a magazine is labeled with „by Mario Lanza“ it was really penned by him personally and contains the „truth and nothing but.“ The fact alone that the said article was printed in „Screen Stars“ makes me doubt that. Wouldn’t this paper fall into the category of „Yellow Press,“ or are we talking about a serious paper comparable to the „New York Times (this is a rhetorical question!)?!
Sure, Mario might have attributed to the letter with one or another thought, but I simply believe that the article was written by a ghost writer. All this was a product of the clever print media machinery of MGM in order to advertise and promote Mario and his films to the best advantage and effect. Consequently, facts were built up, altered, made flowery and arranged to fit. Mario’s real biography was adjusted to what MGM thought would be the perfect image to please his admiring and ardent fans. Things like the story that Mario was born in New York (which still goes around!) or that his profession was that of a druck driver (to match so perfectly with his role in „That Midnight Kiss“) just come to my mind. And of course, Mario himself contributed to create this image, mainly because he had to bow to this common Hollywood practice. I say „mainly“ because we also know that, from time to time, he seemed to have fun to spread false information and hoax people (e.g. that his mother was from Spain or that he had Jewish roots). And yes, it worked, especially because journalists occasionally „forget“ to check facts and to investigate veracity. It’s easier and less time-consuming to crib from others! Still today we sometimes have to read this „born in New York City“ story.
And here are just a few examples to show that Mario himself did not always get the facts right – intentionally or just by mistake:
His height was 5‘ 7 ½ (171,45 cm) according to his army records. In the Hi-Jinx Interview 24 Sept 1949 Mario claimed to be 5‘ 11 (180,34 cm) and in the RAI interview from September 1959 he had shrunk down miraculously to 5’ 10 (177, 8 cm).
Regarding his age he claimed in the Hi-Jinx Interview, Sept 1949: „This morning I was 27 and a half year old,“ although he was already 28, and on the RAI interview we hear him say that he was only born in 1925!
In the interview in Hawaii with Betty Smyser, broadcast 21 March 1950, he says „I‘ been married six years,“ although we know that he married Betty in 1945, which would only be 5 years of marriage! Incidentally, not even Betty got the time of marriage right. In an interview in early 1951 I read this: „Charming Betty Lanza met Mario … when her brother brought him home to Beverly Hills for dinner while he was a private first class in the Army Air Corps: ‚That was in July 1945, … but we didn’t have our first real date until the following October.‘ Hmmm, the first date only after they were married on 13 April 1945?!!
Other incorrect information is that he studied 13 months with Enrico Rosati (RAI interview 1959), while he worked with him 15 months (a big difference given the short timeframe they worked together!), or that his debut opera in Tanglewood was „La Bohème“ (RAI interview 1959), not „The Merry Wives of Windsor.“ Of course, all Italians wanted to hear that he debuted in a popular Italian opera, not in one written by a German composer! And last but not least, let‘s not forget the story which Mario told (very detailed in the Hi Jinx interview, 1949) about his wanting to audition for Peter Lind Hayes‘ army show „On the Beam.“ He said, that he virtually had lost his voice because of the dust in the Marfa desert, so he used a record of Caruso and labeled it with this own name in order to make Hayes believe it was kind of homemade recording of himself. Actually we know that it was a record of Met opera singer Frederick Jaegel. Now, to be honest, who would have been familiar with Jaegel, so it was a clever move to replace Jaegel with Caruso, who was a much more household name! (I would not bet that this would still be the case nowadays!).
I am sure I would find more examples to show that not everything, even when told by Mario, should be taken as a gospel, but I think the point is clear. In Germany we have a saying, which is „Papier ist geduldig,“ (paper is patient) – „Paper doesn’t blush.“ I know our two important biographers did a lot of researches (and for many years) for their books to have the facts correct - and certainly with belt and braces too! Actually I would seriously worrying about them if they had carelessly relied on statements such as those originating from a teenager chatter magazine!
Steff
So, do you prefer to believe an article written by Ida Zeitlin, published on Photoplay in 1951 (quoted in Cesari’s book, chapter 3, footnote 35), rather than an article written by Mario? I would call this naïve… And, please, tell me, where Ms. Zeitlin found all the details, and the dialogues?
In 1950, there was an article where Mario supposedly denied his South Philadelphia origins, and Mario promptly replied with an article written by himself in which he answered back putting the record straight (Modern Screen, September 1950). Do you think that too was written by a ghost writer? Think about the books written by Callinicos, Terry Robinson, and Al Teitelbaum. They were supposedly Mario’s friends. Do you actually believe all that they wrote? Callinicos even invents the last words that supposedly Mario said when he was dying. C’mon….. Not one of them wrote those books because they wanted to tell the truth about Mario. They loved the money they thought they were going to make by writing those books, for sure. Especially Callinicos.
None of the two magazines are the NYTimes, but I am sure even the NYTimes changes things a bit, because of its political leanings/interests. I rather prefer to believe something written by the person who lived the situation, than the article of a journalist who makes her living on gossip. It is true that MGM and all the movie companies were interested in giving a positive image of the actors working for them, but the article I mention is very much in character with Mario. It was more ‘glamorous’ stating that Mario proposed in a restaurant, rather than in Betty’s sister-in-law apartment, that is why I believe Mario’s article more, because it was not glamorous the way things went. Mario and Betty were just two young kids when they met and got married, so it makes much more sense. Plus, Mario was poor at the time. He even did no buy an engagement ring for Betty, and when they got married he could only afford a simple silver band. So, it really makes sense what’s in the article.
You mention radio interviews. It is very easy to make mistakes on dates and numbers. This happens a lot. I work for a radio and you hear this sort of mistakes all the times. So, again, Mario and Betty could have made mistakes on dates, but that is very common. Why, we make these mistakes ourselves when we talk.
Regarding the height. Remember that in Hollywood, in those years, all the leading men in movies were at least 5f10. Mario was below the average height for a leading man in movies. It is understandable that he, and those around him, ‘embellished’ the issue by making him taller than he was. There is a saying here, ‘Altezza, mezza bellezza’, which means ‘height is half the beauty’. Mario was not very tall, but thankfully he did not need to ‘rely’ on his height, because he had plenty of beauty of his own.
One more thing, and that is more on the philosophical side of the matter. Something I often think about when I read biographies. It is impossible, if not useless, writing an accurate biography on somebody. The act of writing about somebody else is itself a lie, because you are not that person. You do not know his true thoughts, feelings, motives. You are looking at that person from ‘outside’, therefore, your biography is just a literary experiment that contains maybe 40/50% of truth in it. And I am being generous. The writer is always biased, partial, because in his/her writing he/she will put his/her own opinion, judgement that inevitably distorts the truth. It is very human. You can only write about what that person did, but you cannot write about who that person was, because it is an impossible task, an act of arrogance, and an unwelcome intrusion into her/his life. As a fan, sure, I would love to know more about Mario and his life, or about the life of other famous figures in history and so on. On the other hand, knowing how impossible would be to know well somebody other than myself, I would not attempt to write a biography. Ultimately, we can only be spectators of what Mario did and thank him for what he left us in terms of his voice recordings. His life, belongs to him alone.
--
To reply to this message, please go to: https://groups.google.com/g/mariolanza
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mario Lanza, Tenor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mariolanza+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mariolanza/897025a0-de0a-48dc-bf96-72e3e65a6c61o%40googlegroups.com.
Quod erat demonstrandum …
Actually, I just feel transported back to „once upon a time," about ten years ago, when I was in the company of people, who believed that everything that Mario (really or allegedly) said and did was right and the things others did and said about him was to be doubted or even condemned - „Spirits that I’ve cited, my command ignore“ (Goethe) - This way of idolizing is a strange and unhealthy attitude of loyal fandom, which not in the slightest does justice to Mario or any other artist who lived/lives a public life!
Yes, there are fans who find no fault on Mario at all and who see him as the perfect, godlike creature and who, when confronted with something that does not fit into their philosophy about their hero, act as if they were bitten by a big thanatophoric spider!
I see your nitpicking has now focused your attention on one particular statement in Armando’s book, which, according to the footnotes, was based on the article „The Mario Lanza Story“ written by Ida Zeitlin (Photoplay 1951). So what?! „Life Stories,“ such as the said one, actually were the result of interviews conducted with the actor/singer themselves or his circle of family (e.g. Betty Lanza or Mario’s parents), colleagues and friends. Consequently, there’s no fault that a biographer uses this information! As for Mario’s letter, I stick to it, it was written by a ghostwriter as were other similar letters (e.g. the „A Personal Letter From Mario Lanza for You - Because You Believe,“ from „Modern Screen, May 1955). Do you really believe that Mario would sit down to write this himself? Then you might also believe that our today’s politicians pen their speeches themselves!!! Keep on dreaming! Due to the lack of time they have their staff to take over and create this poetry.
No, I don’t believe in all the stories from the Callinicos, Robinson and Teitelbaum books, even if they might have a grain of truth at times, and they are far away of being called a biography. Yes, they were written on the purpose of sensationalism which sells better than the truth. Some writers certainly hoped they could profit financially from the late Mario’s fame. Actually their works were, to some extent, a continuation of all that had been written about Mario in the newspaper gossip columns during all the years of his career.
I don’t think that I have to advocate our main biographers Armando Cesari and Derek Mannering here, as they are well able to speak up themselves and have their say and make their points. What I want to mention, however, is that in all the many years that I have been friends with both of them (and also with dear Derek McGovern) - friendships which I immensely enjoy and which I do not take for granted - I have led some lively - objective and competent- discussions. I have noticed how accurate they are in what they do, and that everything they say and write is the result of seriously acquired and long researched material. Derek Mannering and Armando might be worlds apart in their thinking and opinions at times – which I sometimes regret - but both are characterized by absolute integrity. Being German, and we Germans are often criticized for being too pedantic and too accurate, I am sometimes overtrumped by the wealth of knowledge and accuracy of those Irish-American and Italian-Australian „fellows.“ And I am 500% sure that neither of them wrote their books for „glamour effect,“ which would mean they invented stories to make their books sell better! Ah no! They wrote their books out of sheer admiration of Mario’s talent! Do you actually know, how many people they interviewed for their books?!!
If you find so much fault in biographies – and I am exceedingly relieved to hear that you are not planning to write one about Mario yourself! – then tell me, should biographies not be written because the authors did/do not know the celebrity in person? Poor Cesar, Luther, Verdi, Puccini and Caruso etc.!!! We would be poorly off if we only had the books of Callincos & Co. – although they knew Mario!!!!
For all I care, sit on your dreamy Mario cloud, jump on the sentimental bandwagon and believe what you want to believe, but do not present it as the „non plus ultra“ fact, hereby giving the impression that our biographers did not do their job well enough! Don’t give the impression of knowing it all better. You have appeared on the „Lanza scene“ only a few years ago, our distinguished biographers, on the contrary, have had their firm place here for decades! And right so! My hope still is that Armando and/or Derek Mannering might consider to publish new editions of their biographies, since a lot of new things have been unearthed since their first/second publications (maybe you do your homework for a change and visit, for example, our extensive and regularly updated list of live performances – which certainly was not easily done off the cuff and took a lot of time-consuming check backing!) These are the „new“ facts that I would wish to find their way into an edited book, but certainly not this groundbreaking discovery – true or not - about Mario and the location of his courtship!
As a side note, wasn’t it you, who many months ago, was rushing so eagerly to contact a person in England to look for photos of Mario‘s 1959 Easter party with some of his English fans at Villa Badoglio? A party that we know never took place!!!!
And then I was just reminded of your interview with Luisa di Meo, the little cameo role singer, sometime last year. When I read it back then, I had to smile at her flowery recollections of the filming in Rome and her time she spent with the Lanzas, since it sounded different to a story which Damon Lanza had to tell in an interview in 1976 - something Luisa, a first-hand witness, apparently had „forgotten“ in all the years. May I just quote Damon: „Do you remember the scene in that movie where my father is singing ‚Arrivederci Roma‘ at the fountain of Trevi with a little Italian girl? Well, she was a real brat. My father found her in the streets singing while her father played the accordion“ [note from Steff: I think it was her brother]. He liked her so much that he put the both of them in his movie … but, it didn’t stop there. He brought her to our house so that she could play with us. We gave her clothes that no longer fit us and some that did. It always seemed as if she wanted more and more. My sister was giving her some trinkets and toys one day, when she exploded and threw all of our gifts on the floor and screamed that she wanted our angora cat. My sister, Colleen, who was first to think that this girl was less than innocent, screamed back and chased her out of the house. During the time we knew her we found many things missing from our rooms. So did our parents … they found money and other things missing. That girl had some way of showing her appreciation.“
And last but not least, and this is not about Mario, I remember your posting on Jeff Rense’s forum on 10 March 2019: „Domingo molested many women, therefore, it is fair he gets what he deserves: public shame and legal suits. He may have been a great tenor, and he was, but he is also a pig, and deserves punishment.“ Hmmm and wow! I am just wondering, if you eye witnessed those events which were alleged by some attention seeking individuals. Did you hide yourself under the bed or in a wardrobe of his dressing room? At least it sounded like this!!
Well, enough said! „Tutto è stato già detto!“ Any additional comment would be a waste of effort and energy, as one cannot change an inconvincible person‘s mind!
Steff
--
To reply to this message, please go to: https://groups.google.com/g/mariolanza
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Mario Lanza, Tenor" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mariolanza/fcfCM4HuGpw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to mariolanza+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mariolanza/807b14a3-98f9-4cd3-acc6-e7293244dd27n%40googlegroups.com.
Joseph Calleja: Well, I was born with a voice. At the age of three or four, I was singing everything I heard on TV commercials, choir, and sacred music. They couldn’t shut me up. And then at the age of 13, I saw the movie “The Great Caruso,” and I joined a choir instantly. I even sang in performances of “Rigoletto” when I was 14.
OW: Tell me about the “obsession” you had with Mario Lanza when you were young?
JC: I fell in love with his voice, like many others. Singers like Luciano Pavarotti and Jose Carreras had been the introduction to opera for many people. Lanza didn’t sing much opera. He sang only once or twice. But in recordings, you can see that he had one of the most beautiful voices. He was the first crossover tenor as well. I think he was the first million-dollar contract if I am not mistaken. So, it’s quite extraordinary. And when Luciano came, he eclipsed everyone. Luciano is probably the greatest phenomenon when it comes to media. But in Lanza’s time, he was as big as Michael Jackson.
Here are two nice statements of Joseph Calleja and Roberto Alagna, which I was able to make out from the blurred online preview of the August Gramophone issue:
Calleja: "Lanza was a hybrid, the first tenor who had it big in the media, who as able to marry fluent pronunciation, pathos and intensity in both the Italian and the English languages [...]. As a voice many critics disregard Mario Lanza, but I don't, and I am a tenor fanatic."
Alagna: "When you hear Lanza at home studying the Improvviso from 'Andrea Chénier, it is amazing," Alagna confides, referring to a recording that is available on You Tube. "He was so good, so perfect, the voice so rich and with the right temperament - this recording is a miracle."
Steff
Hi Derek,
I did not sense Calleja’s comment as „too defensive,“ as I, too, have the impression that Lanza is still tagged with a certain (fortunately declining) stigma and still not 100 percent accepted in the regard of being a fully accomplished singer/tenor in the classic meaning. We still have to deal with the, „Yes, he had a great voice, BUT…“ - attitude. And then comes this ever lasting cliché about Mario’s short comings due to his lack of stage experience and vocal tutorial.
I was just reminded of our local newspaper man from the arts section, who apparently regarded Lanza‘s singing rather as some good, pleasant „tralala,“ being put into the crooner section, instead of seeing him as an intelligent and serious artist on a higher level. And I often get the impression that some people, the so called experts, still try (hard) to find fault with his singing (in Germany we have a nice saying, which is „ein Haar in der Suppe finden – to find a hair in the soup), although they are running out of arguments by now. Obviously, it is hard for them to accept the facts. Are other tenors so much more perfect, only because they have had an opera stage career? The fact that notably the great tenors praise Lanza should even convince the last unbelievers, so should the great accolade of a reputable magazine such as „Gramophone,“ which now features Lanza as one of the „Tenor Heroes“ and „Voices of God!“ The writer of the article speaks of Lanza’s vocal organ as a voice that „seemed to burst through the speakers, an unbuttoned, red-blooded sound.“ Now, who would have expected this!! Lanza surely has reached the hights of Olympus! And his lobby is growing.
In the Gramophone article of the latest 2021 August issue, which I have on hand now, Villazon, for example, is praising Pavarotti’s voice as „luminous, extraordinary, out-of-this-world,“ and he adds, „on hearing him, there’s nobody ‚who would not recognise him.“ Yes, indeed, Pavarotti’s voice is easily recognizable. Recognizability, of course, is essential in order to set oneself apart from the average tenor. But pardon me, I am no musical expert, but Pavarotti’s voice „out of this world?“ Pavarotti might have had an almost perfect technique, but in my opinion he totally lacked expression and emotion. Whenever I hear him sing popular Italian songs I am suprised at the almost complete lack of passion (now, not everybody appreciates the tenor sobs, but in Pavarotti’s case they would have helped immensely to catch his listeners heart!) -and it would have been so easy for him to score in this section and make it his own, since Italian was his native language. I think here, without doubt, the wheat is sorted from the chaff. Lanza overshines (does this word exist? If not, I’ve just invented it!!) effortlessly. Let alone Mario’s acting skills which should not be underestimated - and one has to wonder where he got them from. I remember seeing a TV screening of „Aida“ (I think it was from the MET), and weighty Pavarotti as Radames leaning somewhat relaxed on a stone, at the very end of the last act of the opera, singing about his being locked up forever in the tomb with his beloved Aida, and just about to die in complete darkness. Absolutely ridiculous! Imagine Lanza had acted that way!
A few months back I was in contact with a man, who for sure has known many of the great opera singers past and present and really can be called an (studied) expert in music and voices. He acknowledged Lanza’s skills, calling him an „incredibly talented opera tenor,“ but could not go without the stereotype opinion that Lanza simply missed the „final touch“ due to his lack of stage experience. What does the one have to do with the other? This man concluded with, „[he was] a superb opera tenor, a great crooner and film star.! Voilà, here we go again with this thing called reservation. Incidentally, the very same man stated, after I had sent him the private recordings of Mario’s mother, Maria, that the „Frau Mama“ sang „charmingly,“ but with a very slight American accent, which in Mario’s case was even „more distinctive“ in his opinion (now, there’s some new reproval you can run after!!).
Incidentally, Alagna commented in the Gramophone article, „A lot of singers take on songs like ‚Because‘ or ‚Be My Love,‘ but they are never like Mario Lanza. The colour was very special, because he had everything – top notes, timbre, phrasing. He put a lot of energy and blood into his sound. The fabric, the texture of the voice is very particular, and even when he sang crossover, it was always in a good style with a good technique.“
Derek, on another note, I am still enjoying the latest Sepia CD – although some of my neighbours complained the other day about my playing the music too loud – no kidding!). It is a big „break“ from those average CDs that usually feature the same „evergreen stuff“ such as „Be My Love or „“Because You’re Mine.“ The liner notes are so well elaborated – I would run out of ideas to offer something new and special after so many successful releases! I am especially delighted that you included gems such as the „Otello“ love duet, which I think would usually not make it on a CD (of course we would have wished for Mario to have a better soprano by his side). I am sure most of the Lanza fans appreciate this jubilee release, which is a very good variety of „all Lanza.“ I have seen many faithful fans „promoting“ the CD on FB, encouraging their friends to get hold of a copy under all circumstances (and I see Bill Ronayne, too, is very diligent in getting copies to the fan base. It is still amazing that neither of our other centenarian tenors has been worth so far to be remembered with a tribute CD.
Thinking of Mario and „Otello“ I once again want to bring a statement to mind, that music critic Jens Malte Fischer wrote in his book, „Große Stimmen:“ Make the experiment and play an operatic recording of Lanza (let‘s take the scene Otello/Desdemona, ‚Dio ti giocondi‘) without mentioning his name, and offer a comparison to other operatic voices. You will observe, that all those listeners will be impressed, who usually would have reservations when knowing that it is Lanza singing.“
Steff
Steff,
Your comments about Pavarotti are spot on. Pavarotti had a good lyric voice (light lyric at the start) with an easy top and a good technique. In Herbert Breslin, he also had an extremely shrewd manager. What Pavarotti lacked was the essential quality that makes a great singer, namely temperament. As you pointed out he totally lacked expression and emotion and this was because he merely sang the notes and did not feel the meaning of the lyrics. As a consequence, with few exceptions such as Nemorino in L’Elisir D’amore where he plays the fool, his identification with most of his other roles is non-existent and in some cases, such as Cavaradossi, laughable.
But all the general public knows and wants to hear is “Vincero.’” (most don’t even know that the title of the aria is Nessun Dorma) They wait for the final high B and go into ecstasy.
Breslin was managing Domingo when he took on Pavarotti as a client. Domingo felt that Breslin could not do equal justice to both tenors and decide to leave him. As a consequence, Breslin swore that he would turn Pavarotti into a megastar. Almost entirely based on the 9 high Cs Pavarotti sang in the opera The Daughter of the Regiment at the Met in 1972, Breslin sold Pavarotti to the masses as the second coming and as the greatest vocal phenomenon ever and the public fell for it hook, line, and sinker. It’s a case of, you can fool most of the people most of the time.
Armando
--
To reply to this message, please go to: https://groups.google.com/g/mariolanza
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mario Lanza, Tenor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mariolanza+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mariolanza/2324ea65-4fcf-4181-ab97-e31143a577adn%40googlegroups.com.
"Listening to Pavarotti is like hearing a computer sing. Everything is perfect - but no feeling."You've just summed up exactly how I feel about Pavarotti's singing. As Di Stefano once remarked: "I sing words; Luciano sings notes."
--
To reply to this message, please go to: https://groups.google.com/g/mariolanza
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mario Lanza, Tenor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mariolanza+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mariolanza/b6efae06-6e21-474d-abbc-14951ac7956dn%40googlegroups.com.
„Singers should sing words, not notes. The words tell the story of the music and should be made clear to those who want to hear them. I will never sing an operatic aria if I do not know the words because I do not believe that the melody is enough, no matter how beautiful it may be.“ (Mario Lanza, 1959).
„To me, the words are pivotal. Without lyrics I am lost, I don’t know what to do. Without lyrics I am
not even able to place my voice properly.“ (Franco Bonisolli in an interview with director August Everding1997)
Steff
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Mario Lanza, Tenor" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mariolanza/fcfCM4HuGpw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to mariolanza+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mariolanza/80616c4d-9795-4e94-a3d9-936a1232289en%40googlegroups.com.
--
To reply to this message, please go to: https://groups.google.com/g/mariolanza
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Mario Lanza, Tenor" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mariolanza/fcfCM4HuGpw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to mariolanza+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mariolanza/5f8b2322-fa87-41fb-8144-ec61907b82ddn%40googlegroups.com.
--
To reply to this message, please go to: https://groups.google.com/g/mariolanza
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Mario Lanza, Tenor" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mariolanza/fcfCM4HuGpw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to mariolanza+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mariolanza/5f8b2322-fa87-41fb-8144-ec61907b82ddn%40googlegroups.com.
I find Corelli’s statement that Pavarotti was suited to verismo simply astonishing. I heard Pavarotti on a number of occasions both with and without amplification. His voice and temperament (or lack of it) were ideally suited to the bel canto repertoire –namely Donizetti and Bellini which requires a good technique (that he had) and an extended vocal compass.
The voice of the unmiked Pavarotti who sang at the Melbourne Concert Hall in 1983, and which has a seating capacity of almost 2500, was strictly a lyric one. The voice had hardly changed when I heard him again at a rehearsal I attended in 1991. To suggest that he would have been suitable both voice wise and interpretably for say, Andrea Chenier, which he recorded, is beyond my comprehension, because apart from the unsuitability of the voice, he doesn’t feel the role and, consequently, he sounds as if he is not involved in the drama.
Armando
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mario Lanza, Tenor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mariolanza+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mariolanza/CAMZtZ5f9f-sKMMLRU_EGWar_k_ONqXoB%2BY_AC6_A0d6YdzFxTw%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mariolanza/CAHwwtPA5Z492E_acBdmD1Ls5FHOZ-Yd5UOCoOmiK%2BG3_FCcMug%40mail.gmail.com.
Dear Peter,
What can I say? To each his own. The unmiked voice of Pavarotti that I heard in in the 2466 seats Concert Hall as opposed to the 3800 seats of the Met was quite small and not large enough for Chenier, so I’m wondering whether the Met Chenier you heard used amplification.
Regardless, I find his performance studied rather than felt and his habit of dragging the vowels, EG. Animaaa , Praati, Pietaaa, Peeetto intolerable. But as I said before, to each his own.☺
Cheers,
Armando
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mariolanza/CAMZtZ5drqSLSXKh7Y2bThYE2DNkSLB5RXGRcxCGKJjYaJEi2Ug%40mail.gmail.com.
Hello to all,
I am sure you will like this:
„Robert Plant reveals the eight songs he'd take to a desert island“
https://www.loudersound.com/news/robert-plant-reveals-the-eight-songs-hed-take-to-a-desert-island
Among the 8 songs chosen by Robert Plant, former Led Zeppelin man, for his desert island list, is Mario Lanza's Serenade from „The Student Prince!“
Presenter Lauren Laverne: „Time for some music then, Robert Plant. Disc number two. What we are gonna hear?“
Robert Plant: „It’s called 'Serenade' by Mario Lanza. When I was invited to do this programme I started looking at something that I would say wouldn’t be "Nellie, the Elephant,“ it wouldn’t be the "Run Away Train,“ it would be something that made me just stop and feel the goosebumps, and this was the first song that did that to me.“
You can listen to the complete BBC interview here (the part about Mario starts at minute 8:00):
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m00159xd
You can also listen to the interview on you-tube, where the part about Mario starts at minute 7:18
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yl0ICDee9rc&t=438s
Steff
Presenter Lauren Laverne: "And finally, which one track of the eight that you’ve shared with us today would you rush to save from the waves, if they were threatened by water?"
Robert Plant: "Well, Mario Lanza. Definitely! Because it‘s so evocative and it carries so much presence and beauty, and it just lifts the crescendos a bar. I mean, imagine singing along with that until you got it right."
Now, this is some terrific statement, isn't it?
You all have a lovely weekend!
Steff
Hi Derek,
… and the Robert Plant story goes on:
Here’s a (translated) excerpt from the Italian article, „La gente per strada chiama Robert Plant con un altro nome“ by Paolo Panzeri (20 April 2022):
https://www.rockol.it/news-729718/robert-plant-led-zeppelin-intervista-canzone-preferita-mario-lanza
„The former frontman of Led Zeppelin, Robert Plant, in the new episode of his podcast 'Digging deep' has reflected and joked about the pleasure of not being recognized and stopped by people on the street [...].
The now 73-year-old Robert Plant is busier than ever. […]
As anticipated before, in the last episode of 'Digging Deep with Robert Plant' the English musician has reflected on how he feels when people on the street do not recognize him, coming to the conclusion that he does not mind. In addition, he revealed that after his participation in 'Desert Island Discs', people now call him Mario Lanza, which doesn't bother him at all. On the contrary, he says he is happy to bring new audiences to the songs of the Italian-born tenor who died in 1959.
This is what Robert Plant said about not being recognized by people in the street: "I think I always have my mask on.
Sometimes I've bought them at the drugstore. I've been around for a long time. Unfortunately I look different than I did when I put on my first record when I was 17. I had the mullet and all that kind of stuff and for a long time I got away with Led Zeppelin. I sounded like a different person. Now these days, a lot of people recognize me on the street and say, 'Hey, Mario Lanza,' which is great for me because I'm not a Hollywood Italian opera singer, but I brought Mario Lanza to the general public with that 'Desert Island Discs' thing. People don't say, 'Hi, Robert' anymore."
It just so happened that last month Robert Plant was interviewed by BBC 4 for the historic British show 'Desert Island Discs' and revealed what songs he would take with him to the phantom desert island. Plant's choices are quite varied - as you can see from the list published below -, asked to name his favorite he indicated "Serenade", a Mario Lanza song from the fifties.“ Translated from Italian with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Here’s the link to the mentioned podcast of „Digging Deep“ (Season V, episode 24):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUMYEBaFllc
Incidentally, Robert Plant also said, "Mario Lanza - I wish I was his agent," and indeed, we could need more "representatives" like him to introduce Mario Lanza to a new/wider audience!
Steff