I've been playing a lot of Lanza's 1959 recordings recently in the wake of our recent thread on the remake of The Student Prince, and I've come to the conclusion that The Vagabond King represents the best of the four English-language albums that Mario made between April and September of his final year. Ironically, it's also the worst recorded of all his 1959 recordings, but if you can get past the ever-present distortion and tinny sound, then what emerges is some impressive singing.
The only way to hear this album, in my opinion, is on the 2006 Super Audio CD (SACD), not the earlier BMG CD or any of its LP incarnations. Having said that, the best reproduction of the Only a Rose duet with Raskin remains the one heard on Lanza's very first CD: the 1987 BMG disc Mario Lanza: The Legendary Tenor. Interestingly, in his review of that album, the distinguished critic Henry Fogel singled out Mario's "elegant" singing on the 1959 Only a Rose, writing that it was almost worth the price of the CD alone. And it is an elegant performance, with (among other things) a beautifully sustained ending that's really quite a model of taste.
To my ears, the weakest tracks on the album are Song of the Vagabonds and Some Day, with Lanza sounding very laboured on both of them. Putting aside his health problems at the time, it's not surprising at all that he sounds tired at times given the madness of his (or was it RCA's?) decision to record the entire album in one session. Some Day was also the last track recorded.
As one might expect, however, the first track recorded was also one of the best: the thrilling Love Me Tonight. Listen to his first high A (on "hours"), in particular, as the man shakes off his ailments (and transcends the poor recording quality) and recaptures all the excitement of his most celebrated singing. Here, the SACD reissue truly comes into its own, with Lanza no longer sounding as wobbly in his lower notes, and the disconcerting splice in the middle of the
song (during the orchestral bridge) now removed.
The other highlights for me are Nocturne (apart from a slightly lethargic start), with its haunting reflectiveness and the wonderful ring to Lanza's high notes, the aforementioned Only a Rose and its reprise in the exciting finale (great B-flat from Lanza at the end), and the Drinking Song. A *small* number of highlights, perhaps, but certainly no fewer than those found on The Desert Song and The Student Prince. (Then there's the 1959 Christmas album, which contains
virtually no highlights!)
I have a lot more to say about Lanza's 1959 recordings, but for now I'd like to hear what others here think...
> I have been revisiting the 1959 Student Prince.
> The stereo LP version and it's a lot, lot better than I remembered, it
> didn't seem half as bad as it's sometimes painted.
>
Den: I agree that the 1959 Student Prince isn't nearly as bad as it's
been described by various "experts", the unfortunate Beloved
notwithstanding! The main problems with the album are a) the poor
sound quality on many (though not all) of the tracks, b) the
indifferent arrangements, c) the obvious lack of rapport between Lanza
and conductor Baron, and d) Mario's health problems, which affect not
only his energy level at times, but also the timbre of his voice,
which is unusually harsh on Golden Days, I'll Walk With God, (the
second half of) Serenade, and Beloved. Significantly, these four songs
were recorded in that order, and probably all at the same session -- a
day when he obviously wasn't well at all. On the final two tracks that
Lanza recorded for the album -- Drink! Drink! Drink! and Deep In My
Heart, Dear -- he sounds better vocally, and I'm sure these were made
on another (happier) day. In fact, there are some beautiful, youthful
touches on Deep In My Heart, especially on the lines "As deep in the
shadow your eyes look in mine" and the very sensitively rendered "Your
love in the heart of a rose."
Of course, RCA didn't help matters by adding a ridiculous amount of
echo to the second half of both the Serenade and I'll Walk With God,
removing all warmth from the sound and completely spoiling the
performances. (The echo is not there on the raw versions.) In fact,
the sound quality is so variable on this album that you'd swear that
there were *two* tenors performing on it! On track #5, for example,
Lanza sounds very much like his old self on the warmly recorded
Summertime in Heidelberg; on the next track (I'll Walk With God), it's
as if a much older tenor has suddenly joined the album. Then it's back
to near-prime Lanza on Thoughts Will Come to Me. Very disconcerting!
But as Armando has written, if one actually focuses purely on Lanza's
*singing*, rather than on the uncharacteristic coarseness of his
timbre, on, say, I'll Walk With God, then what emerges is a committed,
dramatic and ultimately moving performance. (Incidentally, he even
sings the line "I'll *pray* to him" better than he does on the
original.)
Strangely, Paul Baron insisted to me that he'd chosen soprano Norma
Giusti to sing with Lanza on this album because she was the kind of
woman who could put up with his supposed misbehaviour. But as we now
know, Giusti never even met Lanza, and she recorded her contributions
separately in New York two weeks before his death. In fact, one member
of the old Lanza Yahoo forum -- James Kilbourne -- actually knew
Giusti, and confirmed all this. I wonder why Baron felt compelled to
lie?
I also agree with you wholeheartedly about the intelligence and
musicality of his singing during the last year of his life. In fact, I
was struck by this for the umpteenth time while listening to his Pour
un Baiser and Ideale last night.
http://www.4shared.com/file/52599670/e59ccb05/One_Alone__raw_version_without_chorus_.html
Lanza is a little tired here, but it's a beautiful performance nonetheless -- and streets ahead of his earlier Coke version. I'm always deeply moved by it. And the voice itself is in fine fettle: a gloriously resonant and burnished sound.
Joe
Lou: Here's the raw version of Azuri's Dance. I'm not sure if you'll be able to play it, however -- it's a wav file rather than an MP3. Also, the sound quality is not as good as on some of the other "raw" Desert Song material. (I'd say it's a copy of a copy of a copy.) But give it a try, and let me know how you get on:
http://www.4shared.com/file/52739812/502e990f/Azuris_Dance.html
Incidentally, the correct title of this song is Soft as a Pigeon. Azuri's Dance is a separate entity in the libretto, I believe, and, as you'd expect, refers to the non-vocal part of this scene in the operetta.
> I played Love Me Tonight several times today & Mario is just glorious,
> absolutely in his element in this type of material, his intelligence &
> understanding of phrasing was really reaching new levels in the late
> 50's, it is just such a shame that his health couldn't hold up...
Just returning to this earlier post of yours, Vince, I was reminded of
the impact that Love Me Tonight once had on a very literate, musical
friend of mine many years ago. This woman was a huge Lanza admirer who
had recently discovered his singing, but -- like many people -- had
assumed that by 1959 his voice was no longer what it had once been.
She'd come to this conclusion mainly from listening to the 1959
Christmas album -- an understandable enough assumption!
Anyway, she'd never heard any of the recordings from The Vagabond
King, so without telling her anything about the recording (or when it
was made), I put on Love Me Tonight for her. (It was from a Reader's
Digest LP set with pretty good sound.) Well! She was thrilled by it,
immediately declaring that it was one of the most gloriously romantic
pieces of singing she'd heard from him. She loved Mario's phrasing,
commenting on his "earthy, sensual" approach here, wasn't bothered in
the least by the odd vocal blemish (the shaky intonation on the
downward "tonight" at the end of the first half & the wobble on "love"
that follows) and was quite taken aback by his soaring high As. Then I
told her that the recording was from 1959, and she was dumbfounded!
The bottom line for me is that regardless of the fact that quite a few
of the 1959 recordings are understandably well below par (especially
the Christmas album), the gems scattered among those last albums more
than compensate for the lesser moments. But I still think that it
would have been far more helpful for Lanza's legacy if RCA had elected
to release only the *highlights* from The Vagabond King, Desert Song,
and Student Prince recordings -- say, on a single disc -- together
with the entire Caruso Favorites, rather than issuing so many patchy
albums simply because they had been recorded in stereo.
Yes, you're right that Mario and the orchestra aren't quite in sync in
a couple of places on One Alone. But if there's one good thing that
can be said for the pre-recorded accompaniment here, it's the fact
that the slow tempo contributes to the poignancy of Mario's rendition.
Had the orchestra actually been present when he was singing, I suspect
that Callinicos would have opted for a faster tempo.
I was just thinking that it's possible that One Alone was recorded at
Lanza's final recording session. According to the matrix numbers, four
more numbers came after it, but it's certainly conceivable that all
five could have been recorded on the same day. The only thing that
casts doubt on this is the fact that the One Alone *reprise* came next
-- and, my goodness, what a difference there is between this recording
and the full version of the song. On the reprise (which, to date, has
only been issued on the 3-CD BMG set The Mario Lanza Collection), poor
Mario is struggling badly, and I'm not surprised it was never released
on the original Desert Song LP. But then on the very next thing he
recorded (Azuri's Dance), he was back in form again!
Certainly, the last two Desert Song numbers recorded (I Want a Kiss
and One Good Boy Gone Wrong) sound as though they made on the same
day. But nothing is ever straightforward on the 1959 recordings! Just
listen, for example, to Some Day on The Vagabond King. Even on the
SACD, this song sounds absolutely dreadful (in terms of recording
quality), and yet some of the other tracks from the same album (and,
of course, the same session) don't sound nearly as bad. Bizarre!
Hi Lee Ann
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on these 1959 recordings. I certainly agree that The Desert Song is a terribly dated operetta; in fact, even *melodically* it's not nearly as good as some of Romberg's other works---One Alone and the soprano's winsomely plaintive (and seldom heard) Romance being among the few highlights. Most of the score is pretty trite, really. (Could there be anything more banal than, say, I Want a Kiss?!)
While I can understand RCA wanting Lanza to revisit The Student Prince in stereo, asking him to record creaky operettas that were old-fashioned even in 1959 was a peculiar use of his talents. If they wanted show tunes from him, they should have opted instead for another Cavalcade-type album with updated arrangements and the choice of the best songs from Broadway's finest offerings, not a spotty mix of assorted characters' numbers (and of varying quality) as on The Desert Song. Who was RCA trying to please? Broadway fans would have been disappointed by the weird decision to have Lanza sing different characters' songs~creating a rather "inauthentic" Album of the Show~while many Lanza admirers, if truth be told, wouldn't have been interested in an album with a fair amount of non-Lanza time, courtesy of Judith Raskin & co.
I guess a third album of Neapolitan/Italian songs would have been considered overkill by RCA in 1959, but in lieu of that genre or an album of operatic arias, I'd happily have settled for a collection of sacred songs. (There were rumours at the time of Mario's death that he was going to record such an album. Better that than dreary Christmas carol retreads! ))
Still, there are some gems scattered across all three of the 1959 operetta albums---and I couldn't agree more that the highlights reveal a vocalist *and an artist* deserving of far greater appreciation in certain quarters.
Cheers
Derek
Admirers of the late Mario Lanza will be delighted by one of the last, and best, of his recorded performances, fervently if perhaps overcarefully sung [now there's a contradiction!!!], and recorded with remarkably realistic presence. His choice of program materials, too, is admirable, with but a single regrettable exception, an overdramatized and sentimentalized Guardian Angels.
I'd imagine that most Lanza aficionados would rate Mario Lanza Sings
Caruso Favorites as the best of his five 1959 LPs (I certainly would).
There's a lot that's memorable about it, and nothing downright bad on
the album (though Santa Lucia, with its inappropriately heavyhanded
arrangement, and the lack-lustre Lolita are well below the standard
achieved on at least half of the 12 tracks). But what of the four
remaining albums that Lanza recorded during the final months of his
life? Which of them constitutes his best singing, and which is his
worst?
I've been playing a lot of Lanza's 1959 recordings recently in the
wake of our recent thread on the remake of The Student Prince, and
I've come to the conclusion that The Vagabond King represents the best
of the four English-language albums he made between April and August
of his final year. Ironically, it's also the worst recorded of all his
1959 recordings, but if one can get past the ever-present distortion
and tinny sound, then what emerges is some impressive singing.The only way to hear this album is on the 2006 Super Audio CD (SACD),
not the earlier BMG CD or any of its LP incarnations. Having said
that, the best reproduction of the Only a Rose duet with Raskin
remains the one heard on Lanza's very first CD: the 1987 BMG disc
Mario Lanza: The Legendary Tenor. Interestingly, in his review of that
album, the distinguished critic Henry Foley singled out Mario's
"elegant" singing on the 1959 Only a Rose, writing that it was almost
worth the price of the CD alone. And it *is* an elegant performance,
with (among other things) a beautifully sustained ending that's really
quite a model of taste.To my ears, the weakest tracks on the album are Song of the Vagabonds
and Some Day, with Lanza sounding very laboured on both of them.
Putting aside his health problems at the time, it's not surprising at
all that he sounds tired at times given the madness of his (or was it
RCA's?) decision to record the entire album in one session. Some Day
was also the last track recorded.As one might expect, however, the *first* track recorded was also one
of the best: the thrilling Love Me Tonight. Listen to his first high A
(on "hours"), in particular, as the man shakes off his ailments (and
transcends the poor recording quality) and recaptures all the
excitement of his most celebrated singing. Here, the SACD reissue
truly comes into its own, with Lanza no longer sounding as wobbly in
his lower notes, and the disconcerting splice in the middle of the
song (during the orchestral bridge) now removed.The other highlights for me are Nocturne (apart from a slightly
lethargic start), with its haunting reflectiveness and the wonderful
ring to Lanza's high notes, the aforementioned Only a Rose and its
reprise in the exciting finale (great B-flat from Lanza at the end),
and the Drinking Song. A *small* number of highlights, perhaps, but
certainly no fewer than those found on The Desert Song and The Student
Prince. (Then there's the 1959 Christmas album, which contains
virtually no highlights!)I have a lot more to say about Lanza's 1959 recordings, but for now
I'd like to hear what others here think...