Dear all
This is just a quick note to say well done to you all for your presentations yesterday.
We were impressed with the volume of work you have all produced and the efforts you all made to present your ideas to the critics and answer their questions. Many of you had clearly responded to the feedback you received from previous internal and external reviews.
We will send you individual feedback as quickly as possible to give you time to respond before the deadline for submitting your reports, but we thought it would be useful to cover a few issues that recurred and general comments that apply to many if not all of you.
- A number of you focussed strongly, and perhaps inevitably, on the final elements of your design proposal, without explaining so clearly what the organising principles of your ideas have been. It is important to be able to articulate a clear narrative for your ideas, including linking themes or structures through which your projects have evolved from macro to micro and the abstract to the specific. The report will be a useful opportunity to articulate your entire design process in a hopefully coherent manner. Many of you showed only spatially specific drawings, and it might be useful to add conceptual diagrams and/or looser sketch drawings that capture the essence of your ideas and from which your projects have evolved.
- Many of you illustrated your projects with clear 'before' and 'after' images, but did not communicate the stages of change or, particularly, the processes by which that change would take place. Again, it would be useful to use the reports to illustrate (graphically and/or verbally) how and why your projects would happen. Who is involved? Why would they participate? Can people act independently or is collaboration essential? How would you control what you want to achieve?
- A number of you were asked, particularly by Chris Colbourne, what you have learned from the year. What do you take away from the investigations that you have carried out? The report offers you an opportunity to try to summarise and reach conclusions about your own personal development. You should use the final parts of the report to be reflective and self-critical - not in the sense of undermining what you have done, but to consider the lessons you have learned about the city, about the process of design, about priorities, about relationships between scales, etc.
- At the start of the year you were all set briefs that referred to the issue of sustainability and, in the case of our unit, to the ideas of the city as a system of networks, loops and hierarchies. You have obviously all responded to these themes in different ways, and one of the summary comments at the end of the morning session highlighted this variety as a sign of a healthy studio. We agree. But nevertheless, your reports should reflect also on the original brief that you received, and should comment explicitly on the themes and how you interpreted them. Articulate your position and define the terms you have used.
- The report offers you all an opportunity to expand on the themes of your project and articulate the process of design development, as noted above. But it also offers you a chance to discuss Istanbul as a city in a wider sense, and to comment on broader issues about the city as a phenomenon - including other international references and conceptual frameworks derived from other sources. You should use the report as a chance to draw in bigger ideas beyond the specifics of your design project. The format of the report allows you to cover these wider issues.
- Seeing your work on the wall at a distance, and in the context of the work of the rest of the class, should help you think about the final exhibition and the need for key images that capture the essence of your scheme. In some cases you have lots of work of equivalent graphic weight, none of which is particularly legible, whereas for others it would be obvious what you should exhibit. While it is fresh in your minds, identify what your key drawing(s) will be, and reflect on further work that may be needed to get the best impact for the exhibition, as well as in your portfolios and within the reports.
Hope this makes sense.
Jonathan and Ilaria