Correct me if wrong ..

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Atul Morey

unread,
Nov 25, 2010, 1:54:33 PM11/25/10
to marathi-linguistic-team
Hi Guys,

Communist China is no less capitalistic than the United States.

समतावादी चिनमध्ये अमेरिकेपेक्षा कमी भांडवलशाही नाही आहे.


The sentence could have been as follows.

भांडवलशाहीत समतावादी चीन अमेरिकेपेक्षा काही कमी नाही 

Let me know.

Regards,

Atul.

Rishi

unread,
Nov 25, 2010, 2:11:27 PM11/25/10
to marathi-lin...@googlegroups.com
Hi Atul,

Glad to you see you start your suggestions already. Great.

Sorry that I can’t be of much help. I guess you can rope in more people from your community who speak Marathi to join the Marathi Linguistic Team Google Group .

In solidarity,

Rishi

akshay puradkar

unread,
Nov 25, 2010, 2:16:08 PM11/25/10
to marathi-lin...@googlegroups.com
Hey Atul,

i feel it should be an amalgam of both:

समतावादी चीन अमेरिकेपेक्षा कहिँ कमि भंद्वाल्शाही नही आहे.

Regards,
~Akshay


2010/11/26 Atul Morey <atul....@gmail.com>

Rishi

unread,
Nov 25, 2010, 2:23:11 PM11/25/10
to marathi-lin...@googlegroups.com
Wow. This is collaboration at work man. So cool.

Prasad Pullarwar

unread,
Nov 25, 2010, 2:36:01 PM11/25/10
to marathi-lin...@googlegroups.com

hi all, 

As you must have realized by now that there are many spelling errors in my work and you have lot to rectify, please pardon me for all the inconvenience.


Since sentence structure of English and Marathi is not same, there is always a risk of dissonance between what is being shown in the visuals and what subtitle reads. So In my efforts to avoid it while retaining essence of what is being conveyed I’ve bent few grammar rules here and there. Initially I had a very hard time figuring out if this’d work, but so far whoever has read it and understood the technicalities involved agreed that it was necessary. But I encourage you to use your own discretion. 


Thanks a lot for proofreading. Please feel free to make necessary changes. 


Peace!

 

Prasaad



--- On Thu, 25/11/10, Atul Morey <atul....@gmail.com> wrote:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages