Groups
Conversations
All groups and messages
Send feedback to Google
Help
Training
Sign in
Groups
Mappa - Topic Maps
Conversations
About
Groups keyboard shortcuts have been updated
Dismiss
See shortcuts
Issue 57 in mappa: LTM 1.3 parser makes no difference between #TOPICMAP id and #TOPICMAP ~ id
0 views
Skip to first unread message
ma...@googlecode.com
unread,
Apr 30, 2010, 11:38:26 AM
4/30/10
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to ma...@googlegroups.com
Status: Accepted
Owner: lars.heuer
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-LTM
New issue 57 by lars.heuer: LTM 1.3 parser makes no difference between
#TOPICMAP id and #TOPICMAP ~ id
http://code.google.com/p/mappa/issues/detail?id=57
See <
http://code.google.com/p/mio/issues/detail?id=11
>
See also: "Integrate invalid CXTM tests"
<
http://code.google.com/p/mappa/issues/detail?id=41
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mappa - Topic Maps" group.
To post to this group, send email to
ma...@googlegroups.com
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
mappa+un...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mappa?hl=en
.
ma...@googlecode.com
unread,
May 12, 2010, 4:53:23 AM
5/12/10
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to ma...@googlegroups.com
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 57 by lars.heuer: LTM 1.3 parser makes no difference
between #TOPICMAP id and #TOPICMAP ~ id
http://code.google.com/p/mappa/issues/detail?id=57
This issue was closed by revision r374.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages