3d Construct 3

[Cecelia Seiner]

Invery pragmatic terms, this studio asked how we might design and construct thousands of infill housing units in just a few years. To answer that question technically, we emphasized the use of simulated and automated design and construction methodologies. To answer it politically, we first needed to redesign the rules.

Accessory dwellings are a viable model for increasing density and socioeconomic diversity within existing sprawl. However, they face a fundamental typological challenge: inherent inequality. What is secondary cannot be equal. The Secondary project seeks to contribute to the national dialogue on accessory dwellings by upending that condition, by finding ways to establish equity through diversity and community.

+House is an accessory dwelling unit prototype with a minimal footprint for two, independent occupants. It includes space for sleeping, bathing, food preparation, work, and storage in a mere 360 square feet, with a generous porch that expands the dwelling out and into the exterior. This compact and efficient plan demonstrates one viable strategy to provide new, energy efficient housing in Houston while maintaining the existing urban fabric.

See more

Workshop Houston began as the Third Ward Community Bike Shop in 2003 and continues as a lively outreach to Third Ward youth, combining hands-on bike repair and youth programming. In recent years, Workshop Houston (WH) programs have extended to numerous after-school and summer workshops and academic enrichment. To accommodate the expanded program, renovation and expansion of the current facility is required.

In this 'construct model effects' section, there is the ability to assess quadratic terms where a factor for example compression force exists both on its own and as a factor interaction with itself i.e 'compression force' and 'compression force*compression force'.

I do not understand what the difference is from a physical standpoint of significance. Why is it we have the ability to assess a factor interaction where it is just the factor in an interaction with itself? You cannot change compression force and vary it with itself. I can understand compression force vs compression speed interaction since a change in compression force will impact itself and the compression force vs compression speed interaction.

When we build a model we are attempting to explain how certain factors impact a response in our data. A Main Effects model can help here but it is oftentimes beneficial to include additional quadratic or interaction effects to further explain variation we see in our response data.

In the 2nd Profiler, observe the Mill Time variable showing the effect of introducing a quadratic effect on our model. As you adjust the Mill Time value from 5 to 30 you will observe the physical impact of this term on our model: a peak in our Disso response between the two extremes.

To reiterate, simply enough JMP represents the quadratic as factor times itself (essentially the square of the factor) in the model. Provided you have more than 2-levels for the factor in question in your data set, polynomial terms (non-linear) can be estimated.

The handler.construct() method is a trap for the [[Construct]] object internal method, which is used by operations such as the new operator. In order for the new operation to be valid on the resulting Proxy object, the target used to initialize the proxy must itself be a valid constructor.

I am new to the software and am having an issue that looks to have an easy solution but I can't figure it out. I am trying to create a polygon from two polylines in an existing, visible, active layer in my map. It seems I am not allowed to do so because there no available templates (it simply says "none available" in the drop down menu within the construct polygons menu). I've tried creating new templates and nothing changes. What am I doing wrong?!

Yes it is. I figured out my first issue - I wanted to create polygons from a polyline layer but had no polygon layer to use as a template. I created a new polygon shapefile and was able to use that template. However, when I click "construct" nothing happens. I've specified a template and a cluster tolerance (.001m).

The polygons are created in the attribute table but do not appear anywhere on the map. This same thing happens whenever I manually create a polygon feature using the "create features" menu. I've ensured the layer has the correct spatial reference and everything.

To get some help here, we'd probably need to understand more about the data (where it's sourced), perhaps some layer properties (are you using visibility range), are you using definition queries, is symbology causing features to disappear (no symbol for the given attribute value), etc.

After an NPDES permit has been issued by the Division of Water Resources, the permittee must obtain an ATC permit from the Division prior to commencement of the construction of modifications or expansion of wastewater treatment facilities.

NOTE: Session Law 2011-394, which became effective July 1, 2011, no longer requires an ATC permit for construction work at the following facilities with an NPDES permit: waste generated from manufacturing facilities, power generation operations, compost facilities, mine dewatering activities, groundwater remediation discharges, and drinking water treatment facilities.

ATC REVIEW PROCESS: Most applications for modifications that do not result in an increase in discharge capacity or are not required to meet stricter effluent limits will be approved based upon the engineer's certification and will not receive a full technical review by the Division. In order to implement this process we have created a new application form and have consolidated design requirements into the Minimum Design Criteria for NPDES Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Effective June 1, 2013, applicants must utilize the new application form and design criteria. All others will be returned as incomplete. All ATC applications for NPDES wastewater facilities will be processed by the NPDES Industrial Permitting Unit.

Please find the attached updated grasshopper on the description below.

You are able to find the Cull Pattern > Construct Mesh highlighted and grouped together with a detailed message. This is also paired with the rhino file attached as well.

No it is not, the data structure is fine. It is that you misunderstand what that faces output is on deconstruct mesh. That faces output is not the actual mesh faces, it is the face corner vert index map of each face. You cannot cull them and then construct a mesh with those removed but keeping the same verts. Can you just tell me what is the intent? Is it that you want to remove actual faces from a mesh by culling pattern?

Instead of writing imperative code to parse a piece of data, you declaratively define a data structure that describes your data. As this data structure is not code, you can use it in one direction to parse data into Pythonic objects, and in the other direction, to build objects into binary data.

The library provides both simple, atomic constructs (such as integers of various sizes), as well as composite ones which allow you form hierarchical and sequential structures of increasing complexity. Construct features bit and byte granularity, easy debugging and testing, an easy-to-extend subclass system, and lots of primitive constructs to make your work easier:

The site is secure.

The ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Post-transcriptional silencing of plant genes using anti-sense or co-suppression constructs usually results in only a modest proportion of silenced individuals. Recent work has demonstrated the potential for constructs encoding self-complementary 'hairpin' RNA (hpRNA) to efficiently silence genes. In this study we examine design rules for efficient gene silencing, in terms of both the proportion of independent transgenic plants showing silencing, and the degree of silencing. Using hpRNA constructs containing sense/anti-sense arms ranging from 98 to 853 nt gave efficient silencing in a wide range of plant species, and inclusion of an intron in these constructs had a consistently enhancing effect. Intron-containing constructs (ihpRNA) generally gave 90-100% of independent transgenic plants showing silencing. The degree of silencing with these constructs was much greater than that obtained using either co-suppression or anti-sense constructs. We have made a generic vector, pHANNIBAL, that allows a simple, single PCR product from a gene of interest to be easily converted into a highly effective ihpRNA silencing construct. We have also created a high-throughput vector, pHELLSGATE, that should facilitate the cloning of gene libraries or large numbers of defined genes, such as those in EST collections, using an in vitro recombinase system. This system may facilitate the large-scale determination and discovery of plant gene functions in the same way as RNAi is being used to examine gene function in Caenorhabditis elegans.

In philosophy, a construct is an object which is ideal, that is, an object of the mind or of thought, meaning that its existence may be said to depend upon a subject's mind. This contrasts with any possibly mind-independent objects, the existence of which purportedly does not depend on the existence of a conscious observing subject.[1] Thus, the distinction between these two terms may be compared to that between phenomenon and noumenon in other philosophical contexts and to many of the typical definitions of the terms realism and idealism also. In the correspondence theory of truth, ideas, such as constructs, are to be judged and checked according to how well they correspond with their referents, often conceived as part of a mind-independent reality.

3a8082e126