Aladar is right, you must know that all tables have the same structure.
Also, to maintain some data logic, the tables must represent the same
kind of entities.
That said, you understand that merging, or flattening a map in some
sense is not possible. Because it can be built from so many kinds of
sources. Roads, houses, railroads, landscape, properties, power lines
and so on that do not share the same set of attributes at all.
One instance when merging tables is logically sound is when they
represent geographically adjacent data sets, for instance if data has
been delivered per map sheet or digitized from map sheets.
Do not confuse this with merging or flattening layers in a photoshop
image or so. In that case you just stack pixel values on top of each
other. A GIS map on the other hand is a representation of data sets,
and the data sets must be compatible if merging them will make sense.
Perhaps you knew all this and I am stating the obvious here, but did it anyway.
Regards, Mats.E
2008/10/1 Chris & Tybie <waterw...@rogers.com>:
But really, I think you'll find all this to be more work than just
importing tables to AutoCAD one by one. There may also be a way to
import several at a time through the Universal Translator (See Tools >
Universal Translator) but I don't know if this is supported for AutoCAD.)