Riemmanian Hessian and convexity

42 views
Skip to first unread message

Petrichor

unread,
Oct 11, 2024, 3:49:53 AM10/11/24
to Manopt

Can we conclude that a function is convex if its Riemannian Hessian is positive?

In Euclidean space, my function is convex. Referring to your earlier response: "On compact manifolds (such as the circle), geodesically convex functions are necessarily constant (this is standard; see for example Corollary 11.10 in my book)." However, when I calculate the Riemannian Hessian, I find it to be positive.

Is there something I'm overlooking regarding the connection between the Riemannian Hessian and convexity in this context?

Thank you for your help

Nicolas Boumal

unread,
Oct 11, 2024, 4:15:28 AM10/11/24
to Manopt
> Can we conclude that a function is convex if its Riemannian Hessian is positive?

Yes (if by "positive" you mean "positive definite"). For example, Theorem 11.23 in my book, but this is standard.

> In Euclidean space, my function is convex.

This, unfortunately, is not enough. In the sentence above, it is important that the Riemannian Hessian is positive definite; the Euclidean Hessian is not the right object to study in order to make this determination.
Message has been deleted

Petrichor

unread,
Oct 11, 2024, 7:05:52 AM10/11/24
to Manopt
Thank you. My function is convex (I attached it to the message. A is a positive scalar and y and I are complex vectors), and when I calculate the Riemannian Hessian, I find it to be positive definite. According to Corollary 11.10 in your book, a function that is both convex and g-convex must be constant. However, my function is not constant, even though it is both g-convex and convex.  
Capture d'écran 2024-10-11 125936.png

Nicolas Boumal

unread,
Oct 11, 2024, 7:17:36 AM10/11/24
to Manopt
That is not what Corollary 11.10 says.

Petrichor

unread,
Oct 11, 2024, 12:12:39 PM10/11/24
to Manopt
my bad. The manifold I am working on is not compact!
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages