http://www.3dhacker.com/3dprinting/entry.php/66-Food-safe-filament-unless-you-re-3D-printing-with-it
Yes, I know that lye is caustic, acetone is flammable, and 3d prints are not food safe. I also know that there are 4 reasons why they're not food safe, brass nozzles are one of them. The other three are the material, the layers, and the fact that "food safe"is an official designation that you have to apply for. The are food safe plastics, you can vapor smooth the layers away, but I am not going to apply to the FDA to get a food safe certificate. Happy?
[Brow pinch]
I can't find any mk6 or 7 nozzles anywhere, but I'll admit I want looking that hard since I wasn't 100% sure they'd fit. If they do I'll broaden my search.
Dan, I've never heard of that technique. Interesting.... I may give that a try just for the silliness of having it.
What type of stainless are the thermal barriers made from?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MakerBot Operators" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to makerbot+u...@googlegroups.com.
You can use a food-safe material but the printer itself can't be certified food-safe unless the extrusion path is stainless steel.
Not sure what you're saying Joe, but if you're referring to Ryan's comment, I think he was just answering AU's question.
Is there even a real process for certifying 3d printers for making food containers?
Hear conduction through the nozzle is only critical at very high extrusion rates or if you're using a PTFE tube style extruder that doesn't have any significant melting in the thermal barrier. Any MK8 design stainless steel nozzle ought to be fine at normal extrusion temps.
Does anyone make Steel 0.4mm MK8 compatible nozzles? So I can be one step closer to calling my prints "food safe"
Looks good. I would say a bigger land is better. It means more heat transfer cross-section to the tip. And it means you can extrude a wider bead of plastic if you want and still get good results.
ABS itself is more thermally conductive and has a lower heat capacity than PLA. That makes it relatively easier to melt with the same heat flux capacity through the nozzle.
I think this is a good point and makes perfect sense (from a purely mechanical perspective considering a free body diagram) that the internal taper would affect counter pressure at the nozzle. I didn’t give it much attention because I assumed it was just a standard drill point taper (118 degrees, could be 135). It’s tough to inspect without cross sectioning and destroying a nozzle…although I could use some metrological casting material, but didn’t want to get that involved. I don’t have a clean standard nozzle that doesn’t have some leftover plastic, but I could inspect a 0.25mm nozzle.
-Joe
Ryan, thank you for providing the dimensions. Unfortunately, it doesn’t detail the internal taper angle, and I don’t think there is enough information to trig it out. Could take a graphic measurement if we knew that it was to scale (probably is would be my guess). Assuming it’s to scale, the angle is certainly smaller than drill point (looks like about 60 degrees) which means I would need a custom ground tool to duplicate. I did find 60 degree drills on mcmaster but smallest size available is 3.0mm, maybe someone else supplies smaller.