Just as a starting point of your analysis, keep on mind that the 2016 FlashForge Creator Pro is $899 and has a number of improvements over the Replicator.
The new chassis does a nice job of mostly enclosing the print chamber. And the injection molded top cover is less fragile than the laser cut version from before.
The only thing I think is objectionable now is the MK10 design with the PTFE tube which lowers your effective max speed for printing, limits your max temp, and that you'll eventually have to replace the PTFE tube at some point.
As long as you are sticking to PLA and ABS, the machine does great out of the box.
(Disclaimer: I sell the FFCP's.)
I guess thats also part of all of this from what I'm seeing most upgrades are for the 2/2x and occasionally for the 1.
Is this just because the 2 was more popular / so many clones based iff the design?
Im sure in tinkering i can get most things to work but a sturdier box is hard to beat as a platform to start off with and the only bit I can't fab myself.
Think I'm talking myself into a new printer.
Thanks for responding!
Yeah. For all the goodness that I get from the FFCPs, I still do lots of prints on my modded up Rep 1 because I get great quality and it's been my go to machine from day 1.
The newer machines are less wonky out of the box though, especially because they don't have the plastic arms from the Rep1/Rep2 designs.
The FFCP uses Rep 1 profiles, btw. They might look more like there 2 and 2X, but they will print the wrong size if you use the 2 series profiles.
Tinkering with it was part of me getting in to the thing in the first place, however since then it's become more a multi-tool to support other hobby builds around the house. Eg lots of little custom detail stuff for my arcade cabinet. In short my tolerance for dealing with issues on the printer is nearing more frustration than fun. Part of the value judgement i'm trying to make the question being, buy new vs repair/upgrade, is will i ever get it "reliable" meaning better than 10 prints without issue.
So perhaps quality of prints aside (while important) can i also ask with a more upgraded rep1, can i expect it to get to the point of print failures less than say 10% of the time ie one failure in ten (or better)? (my current experience has it at one failure in 4-5 i think)
This is also based on an assumption I go simplify3d or similar route so i verify tool pathing before i print (not exposed well in makerbot desktop) to minimise model issues.
Why wouldn't the Rep 1 not rate highly in print quality? In the past 4 years or so nothing absolutely revolutionary has happened with FDM tech. If anything it has gone backwards somewhat with the Gen5 and all the other Cubes that have tried but gone away. All of the clones use Rep1 tech.
I bought ebm-papst fan, DigiKey 381-2367-ND when I chipped the fan blade on my Rep1. Since then, I have hit the blades a few times with the siren wrench, but have never broken any blades. Although eventually two of the three ribs holding the fan hub to the housing cracked, it still runs fine.
The airflow is excellent but the fan is a tad on the noisier side.
Allen wrench, not siren! DYAC!