just digged through some user comments in the manual which are sorted
date ascending, i.e. oldest posts (from 1999 or 2000) are first. Wouldn't
it be better to sort date descending? There are plenty of issues from
1999/2000 which are already solved in newer PHP versions and I think it
irritate users less if they read the newest comments first.
--
ThinkPHP / rent-a-phpwizard bjo...@thinkphp.de
Sedanstraße 27 Tel: 0931 / 78 43 804
97082 Würzburg Fax: 0931 / 78 43 795
http://www.thinkphp.de/ http://www.rent-a-phpwizard.de/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Vlad
Björn Schotte wrote:
>Hi,
>
>just digged through some user comments in the manual which are sorted
>date ascending, i.e. oldest posts (from 1999 or 2000) are first. Wouldn't
>it be better to sort date descending? There are plenty of issues from
>1999/2000 which are already solved in newer PHP versions and I think it
>irritate users less if they read the newest comments first.
>
>
>
--
> - if a post has survived for such a long time, it's probably valuable.
Many comments that are >2 years old are antiquated because they're
fixed in newer versions.
> - a lot of posts say something like 'In addition to the previous
> post...' or 'the previous post is wrong - someone, delete it! The right
> code snippet is...' - it would be extra confusing to reverse the order now.
What is better?
---------------
post from f...@bar.com
.... bla ...
post from fo...@bar2.com
In addition to the last comment ...
--------------
or
---------------
post from fo...@bar2.com
In addition to the last comment ...
post from f...@bar.com
.... bla ...
--------------
I think the latter one is better: in the cases of "The previous post
is wrong" one wouldn't dig deeper into the wrong post and have the
"right" solution first.
--
ThinkPHP / rent-a-phpwizard bjo...@thinkphp.de
Sedanstraße 27 Tel: 0931 / 78 43 804
97082 Würzburg Fax: 0931 / 78 43 795
http://www.thinkphp.de/ http://www.rent-a-phpwizard.de/
--