The majority of the messages are being tagged by amavisd-new with both
X-Virus-Scanned: and X-Spam-Status: however I would say about 10% of the
messages (which are unquestionably spam) only have X-Virus-Scanned: and no
trace of having been waved at spamassassin. If amavisd-new is handling both
the anti-virus and spam scanning, how can a message get virus scanned but
not get spam scanned?
Any suggestions appreciated!
Cheers,
>>>>> Mike <<<<<
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaVi...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
> The majority of the messages are being tagged by amavisd-new with both
> X-Virus-Scanned: and X-Spam-Status: however I would say about 10% of the
> messages (which are unquestionably spam) only have X-Virus-Scanned: and no
> trace of having been waved at spamassassin. If amavisd-new is handling
> both the anti-virus and spam scanning, how can a message get virus scanned
> but not get spam scanned?
Most likely these recipient domains which don't get X-Spam-Status
are not listed in your @local_domains_maps.
Mark
Thanks Mark, that was it!
Cheers,
>>>>> Mike <<<<<