On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 11:27:57 -0700
Mark Sapiro <
ma...@msapiro.net> wrote:
> You can never know if any of your intended recipient addresses pass
> through such a relay, thus my opinion is if you're concerned about
> your mail being delivered, you can't use SPF -all.
To that end, then, my lists by default tend to be set to
reply-to-list, and they don't munge the sender (From:) address. So a
sample header set from FFML from a recent admin post:
-----
Return-Path: <ffml-bounces
+dennisthetiger=
chez-vr...@chez-vrolet.net>
X-Original-To:dennist...@chez-vrolet.net
From: Dennis Carr
<
dennist...@chez-vrolet.net>
To:
ff...@chez-vrolet.net
X-BeenThere:ff...@chez-vrolet.net
Reply-To: The Fanfiction Mailing List<
ff...@chez-vrolet.net>
List-Id: The Fanfiction Mailing List<
ffml.chez-vrolet.net>
Errors-To: ffml-bounces+dennisthetiger=
chez-vr...@chez-vrolet.net
Sender: "ffml"<ffml-bounces
+dennisthetiger=
chez-vr...@chez-vrolet.net>
-----
Sorry about the line breaks - Sylpheed is set to 72 characters and
really, really wants to word-wrap. =/
In short, +all and -all are foregone (both bad ideas for their own
reasons), and with the above post it all goes out (because a: is me),
but with 300+ users on Yahoo and MSFT domains, am I better off setting
'~all' or '?all'?
Note, DKIM is pending at this point - I'll be reading up on it in my
Copious Free Time(TM). =) (Bad news is that I won't have much time
between now and Labor Day weekend, as I'm preparing for a vacation in
Portland OR. Good news is that, for now, everything seems to be going
well - but the only list traffic that's flown out since fixing the
record is that which I've sent, so I can't confirm that this will
work correctly quite yet.)
-Dennis Carr