Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

debug_peer_level valid values

1,635 views
Skip to first unread message

Bernardo Pons

unread,
Sep 18, 2009, 12:36:33 PM9/18/09
to
--001636ed6b1617bc390473dcbbc0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

Does anybody know which are the valid values for debug_peer_level parameter?


Thanks a lot.

--
Bernardo Pons

--001636ed6b1617bc390473dcbbc0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<font face=3D"courier new,monospace">Hi,<br clear=3D"all"></font>
<div></div>
<div><br><font face=3D"courier new,monospace">Does=A0anybody know which are=
the valid values for debug_peer_level parameter? </font></div>
<div><font face=3D"courier new,monospace"></font>=A0</div>
<div><font face=3D"courier new,monospace">Thanks a lot.</font></div>
<div><br><font face=3D"courier new,monospace">-- <br>Bernardo Pons</font><b=
r><br></div>

--001636ed6b1617bc390473dcbbc0--

Victor Duchovni

unread,
Sep 18, 2009, 12:43:48 PM9/18/09
to
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 06:36:15PM +0200, Bernardo Pons wrote:

> Does anybody know which are the valid values for debug_peer_level parameter?

The default of "2" is almost always good enough. You could try "1" for
a somewhat less verbose debug log.

--
Viktor.

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.

To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majo...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>

If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.

Eduardo Júnior

unread,
Sep 18, 2009, 4:05:18 PM9/18/09
to
Hi,


On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Bernardo Pons <bernar...@gmail.com> wr=
ote:
> Hi,
>
> Does=A0anybody know which are the valid values for debug_peer_level param=
eter?
>
> Thanks a lot.

http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#debug_peer_list


[]'s


--=20
Eduardo J=FAnior
GNU/Linux user #423272

:wq

Sahil Tandon

unread,
Sep 18, 2009, 11:33:20 PM9/18/09
to
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Eduardo J=FAnior wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Bernardo Pons
> <bernar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does=A0anybody know which are the valid values for debug_peer_level

> > parameter?
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
>=20
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#debug_peer_list

Eduardo, what is the point of your post? It does not at all answer the
OP's question.

Bernardo, AFAIK, any value > 0 is "valid" for $debug_peer_level, but if
you set it to something that increments the underlying verbose log level
beyond 3, Postfix will act as if the verbose log level were still 3.
Put another way: there is no additional logging with verbose log level
higher than 3. Of course, I have no idea if this behavior will change
in future releases.

--=20
Sahil Tandon <sa...@tandon.net>

0 new messages