Proposed MFC to hastctl: compact 'status' and introduce 'list' command (fwd)

[Dmitry Morozovsky]

Dear colleagues,

I think some of you do not follow -stable@ -- hence my question here too

--
Sincerely,
D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
[ FreeBSD committer: ma...@FreeBSD.org ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- ma...@rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 00:54:56
From: Dmitry Morozovsky <ma...@rinet.ru>
To: freebsd...@freebsd.org
Subject: Proposed MFC to hastctl: compact 'status' and introduce 'list' command

Dear colleagues,

is there any objection for MFCing the change introduced in

http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248291

(the most major change: compacting output of `hastctl status' to one-liner per
provider; old output is retained as `list' command)

to at least stable/9 ?

The reason I'm asking is that it could lead to changes in hast-related scripts
which one use in production.

If no objections are received I'm (with the generous support from trociny,
thank you Mikolaj!) tend to merge it after, say, 2 weeks.

Thanks!

--
Sincerely,
D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
[ FreeBSD committer: ma...@FreeBSD.org ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- ma...@rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
freebsd...@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stabl...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freeb...@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-...@freebsd.org"