Josh
Now the eqn for Kp: Kp = (P1)^2/P2. You should now substitute for P1=
(rho1) (R/M1) T and P2= (rho2)*(R/M2) T, where R is the universal gas
constant
(R= 8.314 kJ/kmol K) and M1 and M2 are molecular or atomic weights.
Now the eqn for Kp (Kp is given) will result in an eqn that looks like
(rho1)^2/ rho2 = some Number. Thus you now have 2 eqns ( one for Kp
and one for rho_total) and 2 unknowns (rho1 and rho2). You can solve
for rho1 and get the partial pressure from P1= (rho1)* (R/M1)*T. Hope
this helps. I am now terribly stuck with 9.2 (b). The thing we should
prove seems kinda dreadful. i have written the eqn. for Kp for this
problem but i don't have a clue how to proceed.
Josh
The Kp equation will have partial pressures for 1,2,3 and 4. For each
of those you can write the partial pressure as X_n*P where P is the
total pressure, X_n is mole fraction and n=1,2,3 or 4. For
instance...
P1 = X1*P
P1 = (alpha1/(alpha1+alpha2))*P
I'm not sure if the denominator is correct or if it should include all
4 components. I think its correct that the alpha mole fractions only
have alpha in denominator and beta have only beta in denominator since
its an equilibrium and they will be going back and forth between alpha
and beta molecules. Manipulating those equations will get the first
and P portion of last terms of the proof. Incorporating the delta
with the remaining terms should finish out the proof but I haven't
worked on that yet.
Is delta* the same as delta?
I did not have a chance to look at 9.2 b again. I will check this one
later on today. I actually started with the last Ex. (on page 85 I
guess) and the answer I get is twice the result of what the text
gives.
Delta* is the value of delta at equilibrium.
I haven't gotten any further with 9.2b. I emailed Dr. Hassan about it and
he said my mole fractions were set up wrong so I'm not sure how they should
be set up. He said the mole fraction would be based on the total number of
moles that exist in a given instant.
-----Original Message-----
From: mae...@googlegroups.com [mailto:mae...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Ashveen Tewarie
we should use van 't Hoff's eqn to determine Kp at the required
temperature. After integrating I get Kp = 1.7822E-12.
With this and species conservation you can get "ksi". The value of
"ksi" I'm getting is 0.5 x the value given in the text.
Josh
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: Ashveen Tewarie <ashv...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 04:20:45
To: MAE 562<mae...@googlegroups.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: Ashveen Tewarie <ashv...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:59:31
To: MAE 562<mae...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: HW 3
The eqn for Kp, species conservation and N = SIGMA (Ni). You can now
slove for the number of moles of H2O at equilibrium and determine
"ksi" to get the answer the text gives. Hope this helps
-----Original Message-----
From: Ashveen Tewarie <ashv...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 06:05:52
To: MAE 562<mae...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: HW 3