X Force X32 Exe Dynamo Studio 2019 Crack
Lutero Chaloux
It`s no secret that Beats have probably the poorest reputation of any piece of audio equipment. And that`s no surprise really, they embody everything audiophiles scorn in general; marketed through celebrities, popular with kids, have a poor price/performance ratio and worst of all, have gained mass popularity and recognition.
I`ve actually wanted to have a look at the Studio 2.0`s for a while. I despised the first generation model, the sound was mediocre at best and the design wasn`t anything particularly sophisticated. But when the 2013 model was released, I took a liking to the much sleeker design and many reviewers similarly praised it`s more balanced sound. The unit I`m reviewing was actually broken and, as a result, I received them for a fantastic price (also verified authentic). I`ve been slowly restoring them to a listenable state over the past month and am ready to give my unbiased opinion upon the widely renowned Beats Studio 2.0`s.
I generally prefer a slight v-shape to my sound, but still closer to neutral. I like a lot of detail and clarity, but can appreciate a smooth, laid back sound such as that on the X10`s. I prefer a more neutral midrange within a relatively tight tolerance, but I`m probably more forgiving of brightness over darkness. I`m not particularly treble sensitive and can tolerate large amounts without fatigue, though too much ruins the enjoyment. If I use a different eartip/pad/cover during the review I will note that and describe the sound changes.
As mentioned by consumers and reviewers alike, the packaging is very masterful. The box is huge, its outer cover heavy in high contrast images for impact. The front showcases the headphones surrounded by the usual black aether whilst the rear displays some of the accessories and basic marketing.
Sliding off the cover reveals a bright red, two piece box with the Beats branding. This box contains a hard case (containing the headphones) in a molded inlet and underneath that, a box containing the remote, audio and power cables in addition to a 1A wall charger.
Also included is a carabiner, should you want to hang the included case from a bag, a microfiber cloth to retain the shine of that gloss finish and some papers containing warranty information and information regarding the other Beats product range. You`ll feel like you`ve gotten your $400`s worth here.
In terms of aesthetic design, the studio 2.0`s are easily as masterful as any Apple product, and easily superior to the first generation Studio for that matter. This is partly because the new Studio 2.0`s don`t pursue a professional or overly complex look, but rather a more streamlined, commuter design. Beats products will never look understated or subtle, and the new Beats range still retains a more modern, even juvenile orientated look. Regardless, the underlying design of the new Studio`s isn`t nearly as ostentatious as its predecessors.
Looks are always subjective but, to my eye, the Studio 2.0`s are a good looking headphone. They`re very sleek with clean lines and plush pads, the body entirely coated in a very eye-catching super gloss finish. That`s not to say that the design is perfect, the feel of the headphones is another matter entirely, but starting with a positive, the new Studio`s are pretty comfortable.
The earpads in particular are very nice, oval for ergonomics and comprising of soft memory foam encased within a supple if rubbery protein leather. The cushioning is very plush, and whilst the faux leather isn`t as nice as that used on the Oppo PM3`s, it seals very well and doesn`t irritate the skin. The pads have modest depth and fit very snuggly around my largish ears. It feels a little cramped for me but those with more average sized ears will have no issue.
The headband by contrast is pretty average. There`s little padding and the rubber feels cheap and tacky. A bit of memory foam and alcantara such as that on the Bose QC series would have greatly improved the feel of the headphones.
That being said, the headband doesn`t pull on my hair and its grippy texture does contribute to a more stable fit. In addition, the lightweight of the Studio`s combined with a moderate headband width results in long term comfort, somewhat offsetting the firmer, more clamping band.
Onto the body of the headphones, considering that they`re almost completely plastic, they don`t feel too bad. I would expect a little more for the asking price price, the aluminium cups of the Bose QC25`s feel a lot firmer whilst competitors from Sennheiser, Oppo and B&W offer blends of metal and leather that avoid visible plastic entirely. The gloss finish of the new Studio`s looks great, but the feel is pretty poor. The plastic used by Sony MDR headphones for example, have a much more premium feel.
The headband also has internal metal reinforcement, a common point of failure on the first generation model. This choice of materials does grant the headphones an incredibly light weight, great for use during a commute or even exercise. The Studio 2.0`s do have some plastic creak, it`s not too loud, but can sound a little alarming when the headphones are stretched or twisted. Also being both gloss and black they`re pretty much impossible to keep clean, photographing them in direct sunlight was a post processing nightmare.
I also noticed that the clamp force is quite high which, in addition to the great seal produced by the over-ear memory foam pads, results in great passive noise isolation. This is pertinent because the active noise cancellation is pretty mediocre. At first I thought mine were fake because the ANC was barely working but I can sense a slight pressure from the circuits and I`ve tested that both the internal and external microphones are working, it`s just not overly effective. A common comparison, the Bose QC25`s will block a LOT more noise, but the Studio 2.0`s have similar levels of passive isolation to something like the Oppo PM3`s with a little ANC on top. The ANC does a good job blocking low frequencies but that`s it, so isolation on a whole is pretty good, better than most sealed headphones in fact, but most similarly priced ANC headphones will block more noise.
The earcups are quite interesting particular, well finished with varying textures for an intriguing feel. While the external panels are all super gloss, the internally facing panels have a soft-touch finish. The earcups have a really strange angling mechanism that`s both an aesthetic highlight and a functional addition, pretty innovative. They kind of float on a red silicone membrane that contrasts well to the black body and allows the earcups to adjust to pretty much any head shape. It works well but collects a lot of dust without frequent cleaning.
The headphones adjust through a ratchet mechanism that`s clicky but a little mushy. I would have liked small markings on the inside of the band to allow for quicker adjustment. The headphones have a small hinge allowing them to fold in for storage. The headphones get very compact for an over-ear when folded down, fitting into the included case with room to spare for additional cables, etc.
The hinge is a little small, but the alloy build inspires some confidence. They have great feedback with a very snappy locking mechanism, you`ll be unlikely to accidentally fold or unfold the headphones.
This is especially pertinent because the Studio 2.0`s don`t function at all without a charge. Batterylife has been pretty solid in my uses, leaving them on overnight still didn`t drain them completely. I would say that the 20 hour claim is pretty accurate though, as other buyers have stated, it is quite easy to forget to turn them off and the Studio`s have no auto off or standby mechanism either.
Of note, the red b logo on the left is actually a button. Pushing it enables the push to hear function which gently fades out the audio you`re listening to and disables noise cancelling, allowing you to hear your surroundings. It`s a nice feature to have on the go and even at home, working similar to that implemented in Bose`s noise cancelling headphone/earphone range.
The included cables are off high quality. They`re not braided like V-Moda`s cables but are of the typical rubber variety. Fortunately, they aren`t tacky in the slightest with a more matte texture. The cables aren`t awfully supple but are thick and easily resist tangles. Strain relief is present if not especially reinforced and the cables seem to be built well. Both connectors are gold plated and aluminium capped with the Beats logo. I appreciate Beats using a standard 3.5mm connector on the Studio 2.0`s, although the connector is recessed meaning only cables with very thin connectors are compatible. Most first party cables will fit fine though custom cables will probably have issues.
This will no doubt be the most controversial aspect of this review. For the record, the Beats Studio 2.0`s are not a bad sounding headphone in the grand scheme of things and as far as consumer headphones go, they`re definitely up there with the best. But they quickly pale in comparison to audiophile headphones, the tonality isn`t as tastefully tuned and the outright quality of the sound is just good but rarely great. For $400 I would expect a great sound, but the Studio`s are a headphone that rather occasionally surprise but frequently disappoint.
With a moderately v-shaped sound, the new Studio`s pursue the trademark bass heavy sound intrinsic to Beats products. This time, however, Beats have tuned the Studio 2.0`s with a more excited high frequency response to prevent a dull or veiled sound. Perhaps they`ve been a little overzealous with this tuning, because the Studio 2.0`s lack a bit of smoothness to the midrange and treble, often sounding a little harsh and even thin at times. This contrasts to the very thick bass response and warm lower midrange. Unsurprisingly, one of my main gripes is the bass response. With a focus on mid and upper bass, the Studio 2.0`s sound bloated without a whole lot of sub-bass impact. While sub-bass is also boosted, it`s not as extended as one would expect from the level of seal produced by the Studio`s.
7fc3f7cf58