David Italiaander
unread,Nov 8, 2016, 10:35:20 AM11/8/16Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Ron Huber, mack...@googlegroups.com, Friends of Penobscot Bay BOD, penba...@googlegroups.com
I have spoken to Mr. House recently and, while I consider his project commercially rather ambitious, what he is planning is easily achieved at Sprague.
His volumes of a couple of hundred thousand tons a year aren't that much, he needs inside storage, and a very high speed bulk loading system to accomplish his goal and he claims that Sprague has agreed to build them, under contract.
He claims his contracts are for biomass for burning in Europe not papermaking. The heat treating is to meet fumigation requirements without chemicals because it is being burned and regulations in the EU prohibit burning wood containing chemical fumigants.
Sprague has no property on Sears Island. There is no "Marine Transportation" area on Sears Island, only a parcel of DOT land the state would like to use for future port development when and if Mack Point is fully developed as a port.
This will not happen. Mack Point is the 57th largest port on the east coast. It is mostly a fuel depot now with scrap metal exports and, perhaps, wood chips. Maybe used RR ties to India.
But this is not the type of growth that will max out the port any time soon.
Then there is the issue of the hundreds of millions of dollars it would take to build a port on the Island. Who pays for it and how do they make enough money to run it?
There will never be a cargo port on Sears Island.
David
P.S - GO VOTE - everyone, Go Vote.