You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to machine-learning-with-large-d...@googlegroups.com
For me it converges in 12 scans.
Tarun Sharma
unread,
Mar 25, 2012, 3:51:40 PM3/25/12
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to machine-learning-with-large-d...@googlegroups.com
Really! It takes 100 scans (not necessarily full scans) for me on Test.adj
-- Tarun Sharma
Graduate Research Assistant
School of Computer Science
Carnegie Mellon University
Eliot Knudsen
unread,
Mar 25, 2012, 7:06:40 PM3/25/12
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to machine-learning-with-large-d...@googlegroups.com
I have the same thing as Tarun and I'm worried it isn't converging properly, but I'm not sure exactly how to debug this. Let me know if you have any suggestions.
Eliot
Tarun Sharma
unread,
Mar 25, 2012, 7:08:17 PM3/25/12
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to machine-learning-with-large-d...@googlegroups.com
It converges really fast. What do you mean by not converging properly ?
Eliot Knudsen
unread,
Mar 25, 2012, 7:10:18 PM3/25/12
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to machine-learning-with-large-d...@googlegroups.com
If it isn't updating correctly then it will converge in more (or fewer) scans. 100 scans is not very fast.
Eliot
Elmer Garduno
unread,
Mar 25, 2012, 7:33:34 PM3/25/12
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to machine-learning-with-large-d...@googlegroups.com
You could check for invariants after each scan, like the total probability of p + r = 1, then you can see if your probs are going wild.
Tarun Sharma
unread,
Mar 25, 2012, 7:45:01 PM3/25/12
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to machine-learning-with-large-d...@googlegroups.com
p+r is coming out to be 1 after each scan. No. of scans are still 100. Regarding no. of scans - I break the scan of file once i find any node with r_u/d_u greater than epsilon.
Tarun Sharma
unread,
Mar 25, 2012, 8:02:47 PM3/25/12
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to machine-learning-with-large-d...@googlegroups.com
the no. of iterations are 12 when you don't break the scan of the file once you find the node with r_u/d_u greater than epsilon and continue scanning from the next line.
Tianle Huang
unread,
Mar 25, 2012, 8:47:08 PM3/25/12
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to machine-learning-with-large-d...@googlegroups.com
<i think you can keep scanning the file to the end. After you finish it, you can scan the file again. You can stop the scanning when you find that for each file, no line meets the greater than condition.
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Tarun Sharma
Ni Lao
unread,
Mar 25, 2012, 9:05:01 PM3/25/12
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to machine-learning-with-large-d...@googlegroups.com
It would be inefficient to break scans at every push
Ni
William Cohen (CMU)
unread,
Mar 25, 2012, 9:59:24 PM3/25/12
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to machine-learning-with-large-d...@googlegroups.com
This is correct - you should scan all the way to the end before you restart.