Thanks Sean (and Ruth and Frank) for sharing this information. I may be the only VBF board member on the VACA listserv, and I'm one of the few on the board who races.
I've kept myself restrained from blasting these out to the list, but I do think it's important we're all active. A few emails from constituents can do a lot to influence Delegates and Senators. Something else to keep in mind is to
contact them early in the process. We've had a lot of success this year, but we still have some major pushes ahead of us, especially after "crossover", when bills that pass their original houses cross over to the other house to be voted on. This is traditionally where our bills die, if they don't die in subcommittee at the very first phase.
I think we can all agree that 3-ft passing (one additional foot than in the current code, which is tiny compared to most states) and protection from vehicles following too closely can help protect us as we train on open roads (and in all other types of rides). Dooring is a concern for many of us who have to ride out of the cities where we live to get to those open roads. I'm happy to chat about the complexities of these bills (how 3ft passing is difficult, but not impossible, to enforce; how following too closely is largely only useful after a crash has occurred unless witnessed by an officer; and how following too closely's language has been improved upon last years to remove ambiguity that might lead to citing cyclists drafting each other), but all three of these bills are definite improvements. The racing community puts more miles in on our roads than any other cycling demographic, except maybe extreme tourers, so we have the most to gain.
about these bills because we aren't dealing with small subcommittees. When the full Senate and House vote, every district and constituent are represented. After crossover, I have seen the houses be very critical of bills originating in the other body. It's critical that Senators be pressured to support House bills, and vice versa.