|
Abstract of the presentation:
Self-validation theory (SVT) postulates that thoughts become more consequential for judgment and action as the perceived validity
of the thoughts is increased. Instead of focusing on the objective accuracy of thoughts, SVT focuses on a subjective sense that one’s thoughts are appropriate to use. In this presentation, I will emphasize the difference between merely having a metacognitive
experience associated with a thought (e.g., this thought came to mind with ease, I feel confident in it, I feel good about it) and subsequently using that experience to inform judgment and behavior. Although having metacognitive experiences and then using
those experiences are closely related processes, they are conceptually and empirically distinct. Importantly, there are individual and situational factors capable of moderating when people rely on their metacognitive experiences. Specifically, recent research
has identified three key moderators of metacognition usage. Using metacognition is impaired (and therefore people become blind to their metacognitive experiences) when the extent of elaboration is low, when individuals feel socially observed, and when people
act for selfish motives.
|