|
Abstract:
In a time of disagreements about values, politics, and cultural practices, psychological scientists have turned to possible antidotes to societal acrimony - the concept of wisdom.
Interest in wisdom has come from diverse research areas, including leadership and organizational behavior, personality science, positive psychology, judgment/decision-making, education, culture, and intergroup and interpersonal relationships. I will critically
examine the diverse approaches to defining and measuring wisdom and describe what many scientists studying wisdom see as common across a myriad of definitions: epistemic humility, consideration of multiple perspectives and ways a situation may unfold, observer
viewpoint on a situation, and willingness to be open-minded to different perspectives. After establishing common ground across definitions and reviewing the validity of different measurement approaches, I will highlight research that explores the role of macro-
and micro-level factors - from economic security to interdependence in social coordination - for these features of wisdom, along with initial steps to develop evidence-based interventions. Furthermore, I will review empirical evidence concerning benefits and
drawbacks of these characteristics for personal decision-making, interpersonal relationships, scientific enterprise, and society writ large.
|