Lusca Head running for 3 hours

[Nyamul Hassan]

Hi,

Lusca Head has been running for 3 hours now, and behaving quite well.
During squid start, the storage was read into memory in less than 8 mins,
which is quite a remarkable improvement over Squid Head!

Apart from that it is running quite well, are there any more information
that you want me to post?

Regards
HASSAN

[Adrian Chadd]

2009/5/23 Nyamul Hassan <mnha...@usa.net>:

> Lusca Head has been running for 3 hours now, and behaving quite well.
> During squid start, the storage was read into memory in less than 8 mins,
> which is quite a remarkable improvement over Squid Head!

Good!

> Apart from that it is running quite well, are there any more information
> that you want me to post?

Do you keep statistics? Posting some statistics showing performance
and workload information would be great.

Thanks,

Adrian

[Nyamul Hassan]

Hi,

I keep some graphs as attached in this email.

If I can be of any help with any other information, please please let me
know.

Regards
HASSAN

[Nyamul Hassan]

Hi,

After running Lusca Head since May 23, it suddenly started to go 100% on cpu usage, and stayed there for 2 hours or so; browsing came down to a crawl.  We then did a "-k shutdown", and it exited gracefully.  We started it again yesterday evening, but after 18 hours, it did the same thing again.

I've not yet shutdown the process, and will give it a couple of hours before doing that.  Can you shed some light why this is happening?  Squid 2.7STABLE6 didn't have this problem.  Is there a way to find out what makes Lusca Head use the CPU so much?

Regards

HASSAN

[Adrian Chadd]

What platform are you running Lusca on? If you're running Linux you
can use "oprofile" to gather some basic profiling information.


Adrian

2009/5/31 Nyamul Hassan <mnha...@usa.net>: