I recently put my hands on this whole setup (with memory) as i brough it all for like $160 so the price to performance ratio was too good to ignore it.
As far i managed to OC it to 3.91 GHz with all power saving features enabled. But the voltage... to make it stable i had to use 1.3 cpu vcore which seems high,
i heard 1.3v is the maximum "safe" voltage on this chip, because the "voltage spike" might occur and increase the voltage up to +0.05v, and any voltage above 1.35v is dangerous to this chip (intel specs).
Anyway, i dont think that too low voltage is the issue. Temps are quite ok, from 34-40 when completely idle, from 40-50 when doing light tasks like watching youtube + browsing web + few other light apps, to 70-75 on hottest core when stresstesting.
I tried to lower the multiplier to 20 and setting blck to 200 and memory multiplier to make it round 1600 with all stock latency etc to be sure memory is not the problem - it didnt even post, had to reset the cmos.
I tried to downclock the memory with my current 22x multiplier to be as close to/bit lower than stock 1600 and setting latencies on stock - still if I'm getting above 3.91 its not stable, no matter what.
Any magic trick that i missed? Anyone had similar setup and managed to solve similar issue? I heard 4.0 GHz oc is easy even on x5650, so i was hoping for, like 4.2 on my x5670 but cant get past 3.91 :c
Results: HA-VMAT provided higher HI (1.41 0.07 vs. 1.24 0.07, p < 0.01), CI (0.93 0.02 vs. 0.90 0.05, p = 0.01) and lower GI (3.06 0.42 vs. 3.91 0.55, p < 0.01) values. Moderate-to-low dose spreads (V4Gy-V16Gy) were significantly reduced (p < 0.01) in the HA-VMAT plan over that of C-VMAT. HA-VMAT plans resulted in more complex MLC patterns (lower MCSV, p < 0.01) and higher MU (p < 0.01).
The upper section of Hole CAR23-015 returned 3.91% Cu and 0.21 g/t Au over 8 m from 151 m downhole at the Northwest target. This intercept is approximately 60 m from the 0.55% Cu over 2m intercept at the end of hole CAR23-012 (Figure 1; see press release dated April 27, 2023). The return of assay results has been slow and approximately 50 assays are currently outstanding from the bottom of hole CAR23-015.
After inverse propensity score weighting, the ACP combination associated with the largest proportion of patients receiving value-concordant care was DNR, HCP, and EoL discussions (87% vs. 64% for no ACP activities; OR = 3.91, p = 0.006). In weighted analyses examining each ACP activity individually, DNR orders were associated with decreased likelihood of life-extending care (89% vs. 75%; p = 0.005) and EoL discussions were associated with increased likelihood of hospice care (77% vs. 55%; p = 0.002) among patients prioritizing comfort. ACP activities were not significantly associated with increased likelihood of receiving value-concordant care among patients prioritizing life-extension.
aa06259810