Replay Media Catcher Review
Janne Desir
Most of the files you want to download will be very easy as this can be done with just a click of a few buttons. Also, it allows you to legally record in those built-in audio recorders the encrypted formats of the music sites.
To capture streaming video and audio from thousands of websites and streaming platforms. It can detect and download media files automatically as you browse the web, or you can enter specific URLs to capture content from particular sources.
For capturing high-quality video from your screen. It enables you to record anything playing on your computer screen, including online videos, webinars, gameplay, and more, with excellent quality and minimal performance impact.
For recording streaming music from various sources, such as online radio stations, music streaming services, and internet radio. It can identify and tag recorded songs with metadata like artist, album, and genre, providing an organized library of your favorite tracks.
For converting audio and video files between different formats. It supports a wide range of file types and offers presets for popular devices like smartphones, tablets, and gaming consoles, making it easy to optimize media files for playback on various devices.
For splitting and trimming audio and video files without re-encoding. It enables you to quickly extract segments from large media files, remove unwanted sections, and save the edited clips in various formats.
To record radio shows, podcasts, and streaming audio from thousands of online radio stations and subscription-based services. It includes features for scheduling recordings, automatically splitting tracks, and skipping commercials during playback.
Note: If you mainly want to download audio and video files from the Internet, then RMC is enough. If you are an audio-video professional who requires capturing as well as conversion tools, then you better read the full review on Replay Capture Suite as it may better suit your needs.
When you look at all the great features of the software and you even can try the software for free to experience what the software can do for you. Once purchased, you also get free lifetime updates of the software as the program constantly improves to meet new user requirements or fix any bugs.
Applian Technologies is currently offering a free trial which is pretty cool and every purchase also comes with the no-questions-asked 30-day money-back guarantee! This turns your purchase into zero-risk! So take advantage of it NOW!
Powell Wong is a chief editor and writer at SmartPoint Inc., the company that manages this website. He graduated from university in computer science, has over 20-year experience in the field, and mainly writes about multimedia software for this site.
The owner of this site is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.
dvd2dvd.org is a site that provides great resources related to multimedia software. Here you can find unbiased reviews, how-to guides, and links to download popular software like Blu-ray/DVD ripper, video converter, video downloader, video capture, and video editing software.
A lot of people are still trying to figure out MLB's new home plate collision rules. There are many things that a runner can't do, and those mostly haven't been a problem. The debates have come up when a catcher is perceived to have been blocking the pathway to the plate.
On Saturday, Athletics' catcher Derek Norris fielded a throw from Yoenis Cespedes and tagged out Chris Ianetta, who was trying to score. The call on the field was that Ianetta was out, and the replay review confirmed the call. Having watched the Angels broadcast (they were confident that Norris had blocked the plate) and read some of the comments on Halos Heaven, I thought it would be worth taking a look at why this (and other) calls have been upheld despite potential transgressions from the catcher.
7.13.2: Unless the catcher is in possession of the ball, the catcher cannot block the pathway of the runner as he is attempting to score. If, in the judgment of the Umpire, the catcher without possession of the ball blocks the pathway of the runner, the Umpire shall call or signal the runner safe. Notwithstanding the above, it shall not be considered a violation of this Rule 7.13 if the catcher blocks the pathway of the runner in order to field a throw, and the Umpire determines that the catcher could not have fielded the ball without blocking the pathway of the runner and that contact with the runner was unavoidable.
The first thing to note is that this rule is being used very conservatively. We have not seen a lot of calls get overturned due to the catcher blocking the plate, and it has required a level of plate-blocking beyond the initial interpretation of most viewers. But, a good start would be to see what it looks like when a catcher does get called for a violation:
The first difference regards the arrival time of the ball. It's subtle, but it's there. When Norris catches the throw, Ianetta hasn't even reached the batter's box yet. Heck, he's several feet away from it; he's barely even in the frame yet if you watch the replay at around the one-minute mark. But by the time Carlos Ruiz catches it, Nolan Arenado is already halfway through the box and inches from the plate. To me, that makes the difference here:
In my opinion Norris had the ball a split-second before Ianetta made his attempt to score. I think that MLB should clearly define when an attempt to score has begun; is it conceived as the runner rounds third base, or does it not become a living attempt until he is actually physically trying to touch the plate? (I tend toward the latter interpretation.) If this clarification has been made and I just missed it, please correct me in the comments.
Second, I simply don't think Norris blocked the plate. Look at the replays again. Although Norris' foot is in no-man's land for a moment, Ianetta is still able to make a clean slide straight through the middle of the plate with little-to-no contact as he passes by Norris' left side. On the other hand, look at Arenado's slide, at the 0:50 mark of his video -- he goes straight through the legs of Ruiz to get to the dish. Ruiz's position essentially forces a (minor) collision, which is exactly what the rule is trying to prevent. Since Arenado slid (as the rule also requires), the collision wasn't particularly bad, but it was Ruiz's fault that it happened.
Go back to the 0:50 mark to see it -- he has to reach all the way across the basepath to catch the throw, and as soon as he has it he backs off. If anything, he did a great job of staying as out of the way as possible as he fielded it. He just kind of poked his arm out as far as he could rather than moving his entire body into the basepath, which is a bit riskier for him as it opened up the possibility of missing the ball entirely -- though you could argue that his motivation for reaching was holding his position to make the tag rather than staying out of the way for the sake of the rule, which is irrelevant in this case since one way or the other it made him follow the rule. Given that he reached as far as he could rather than move his body into the path, I think he's clear here as well:
So, there we have it. Norris had the ball before Ianetta attempted to score (in my opinion, at least), he literally did not block Ianetta's path to the plate (since he slid straight through with little to no contact), and any amount that he was in the basepath was clearly because he was making a reasonable effort to field the throw. This one looks cut-and-dried to me, and I think the umpires got it 100 percent right. What's more, this is one more data point as we all try to pinpoint the specific limits that will be applied to this rule in practice.
Oh shoot, he totally blocked the plate a little bit on the Kalhoun tag (go to 1:57). Not egregiously, but a little bit -- Kalhoun had to slide into Norris' foot ever so slightly. But Norris also had the ball in plenty of time. Oh well.
All reviews are conducted at the Replay Command Center, which is located at Major League Baseball Advanced Media headquarters in New York, by replay officials -- full-time Major League umpires who work shifts at the Replay Command Center in addition to their on-field shifts. Replay officials review all calls subject to replay review and decide whether to change the call on the field, confirm the call on the field or let stand the call on the field due to the lack of clear and convincing evidence. Beginning in the 2017 season, replay officials are expected to render a decision on a replay review within a two-minute time period (some exceptions permitted).
If replay review results in a change to a call that had been made on the field, the replay official shall exercise his discretion to place both clubs in the position they would have been in had the call on the field been correct.
The decision of the replay official to either uphold or change one or more calls subject to replay review shall be final and is not subject to further review or revision. Once replay review is initiated, on-field personnel from either club who further argue the contested calls or the decision of the replay official shall be ejected. No protest shall ever be permitted on judgment decisions by the replay official.
If a call is overturned on replay review, any decision made by a manager after the play and influenced by the incorrect call shall be nullified. That manager shall be permitted to reaffirm or change his strategic decision based on the result of the play as determined by the replay official.
c80f0f1006