Roger B70 Manual

[Colette]

Mechanicalhand-wound and self-winding watches should be wound at least once a month to prevent the oil from drying out. When a watch has stopped after not being worn, we recommend manual winding by turning the crown at least thirty times. An automatic watch should then be worn 10 hours per day to be automatically fully wound. Manual watches should be wound every day at the same time to benefit the maximum power reserve and benefit the best performances. Take care not to force the crown once you feel resistance. Before any contact with water make sure the crown is correctly screwed down or pushed back to prevent water from penetrating the mechanism.

Roger Dubuis timepieces are equipped with security gaskets that guarantee their water resistance. They can deteriorate because of natural ageing, fluctuations, impacts or cosmetics. If condensation appears under the glass of your Roger Dubuis watch, it means that the water resistance is damaged. We recommend having the water-resistance checked every two years by an Authorized Service Center, especially before a period of intensive use such as summer holidays.

Roger Dubuis watches are made to stand up to intensive use. Care must be taken, however, to avoid dropping them or knocking hard objects which might cause damages to the case or/and movement. We advise to store and wear watches and jewelry separately to preserve them from scratches.

Do not use any chemical products since they may damage your watch. If it has been exposed to these, clean it with a soft brush and lukewarm water, then dry it with a microfiber cloth. For paved timepieces, check the stones regularly to ensure they are securely set.

If you are looking for additional information about Ignite TV set-top boxes and Internet gateways, you can also check the Shaw support site (search for BlueCurve). The Comcast Xfinity support site is also a useful resource but it can be confusing because it contains information about older X1 gear (that Rogers never deployed) as well as a lot of information about products and services that are specific to Comcast.

How do we escalate this within Rogers. I am a current Shaw with Rogers customer.

I currently have Shaw Arris TV Gateway with 2 TB external drive & 3 terminals for past several years it is excellent but hard drive issues and may have to update to Ignite TV.

I went to the Rogers website to review Ignite TV user manual and found a few random Ignite TV FAQs and a 1 minute video of nothing relevant. I almost gave up and then went back to Shaw website, did a search and found complete online User Manual. Shaw has always been very good at online manuals as well as PDFs.

I am very concerned that as the Shaw Rogers merger proceeds further than Shaw's website info may disappear.

SO HOW DO we escalate that this info is required? Is ther a way to provide Feedback to Rogers executive like there is for us to provide feedback to Shaw Executive. Shaw's feedback link is still on website but does not seem to get same level of response that it did before the Rogers buyout.

I found some of it with a search on the link you provided. If you go to the Shaw website ( -articles/equipment-info-shaw-tv-equipment-user-guides/ta-p/5560?respon...) , you will see more that could be added to make the transition more user friendly. Just suggestions. The Shaw online guides have helped me a lot over the years.

@57 I hear your perspective. Though I may disagree with the percentages, I do agree with your premise.

I use multiple ways to resolve issues/research all the time.

One of which is user manuals in 2 cases at least

1. if all else fails; and

2. if something new of interest.

A merger provides the opportunity for Rogers to benefit from the work of Shaw's people as well as just taking over their customer base.

My comments here are for those employees/executive at Rogers that may perhaps be interested in customer input on some of the benefits of the buyout

such as the Shaw documentation that Rogers currently provides to some of us as their current "Shaw with Rogers" customer base.

Another problem with publishing a comprehensive "user guide" is that you need to pay somebody to write it and keep it up-to-date... and whatever you publish will be too much information for some and never enough information for others.

Comcast puts their documentation online. Customers/technology licensees, such as Rogers and Shaw, use that as boilerplate for documentation that they, in turn, provide to their customers. (In my opinion, Shaw did a better job of this for BlueCurve than Rogers did for Ignite TV.) The challenge with this approach is that Comcast now offers a broader, more diverse suite of products under their Xfinity brand than Rogers or Shaw did, and as their products become more tightly-integrated, it becomes more cumbersome for Rogers to customize. You can't just use their docs as a template and simply apply/substitute Rogers branding.

Comcast tried to design the UI of their TV product to be familiar (if you know how to drive a Ford car, you should also be able to drive a Chevy) and to make other unique features discoverable. e.g. When navigating the Guide, if you press the "right arrow" button repeatedly, a tip will pop up telling you that you can navigate to the next day by pressing the Fast Forward button.

Rogers also used to have a "Tips & Tricks" button accessible from the set-top boxes Help screen. "Tips & Tricks" is still available on the Apps screen (waaay down in the Daily Life apps section). You can also access YouTube tutorials from the Help screen as well.

Even taking the Voice Remote as an example, Comcast offers remotes (e.g. and XR16 and the new XR100 for their streaming service boxes) that Rogers and Shaw do not. Comcast and Shaw also offer the "web remote" to their customers but Rogers does not... at least not net. Hopefully, once Rogers and Shaw customers are integrated onto common systems in the back-end, and the Rogers and (former) Shaw Ignite TV services share a common feature set, the online support pages will become unified and improved as well.

The site is secure.

The ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Synopsis: This clinical commentary provides evidence-based information regarding adverse cerebrovascular events in the context of manual therapy assessment and management of the cervical spine. Its aim is to facilitate clinical decision making during diagnosis and treatment of patients presenting to the therapist with cervicocranial pain. Rather than focusing on a traditional view of premanipulative testing as the cornerstone for decision making, we present information concerning the clinical presentation of specific vascular conditions. Additionally, we discuss the assessment and management of musculoskeletal pain in the presence of risk factors for cerebrovascular accident. It is proposed that vascular "red flag" presentations mimic neuromusculoskeletal cervicocranial syndromes. Invariably, the 2 conditions coexist. This reasoning presupposes that some patients who have poor clinical outcomes, or a serious adverse response to treatment, may be those who actually present with undiagnosed vascular pathology. We use 2 case reports to demonstrate how incorporating vascular knowledge into clinical reasoning processes may influence clinical decision making.

Lsim2 is gate/switch-level digital logic simulator. It enables users to model digital circuits both at the gate and switch level and incorporates features the support investigation of the simulation task itself. Lsim2 is an augmented version of the original lsim* with the addition of several new MSI-type components models. This user's manual describes procedures for specifying a circuit in lsim2, mechanisms for controlling the simulation, and approaches to modeling systems.

Written assignments for courses in the Cummings School of Architecture, Art at RWU are required to follow the standards of the appropriate style manual (see below). For quick information about citing sources, use the menu on the left. For complete information, use the guides themselves. Click on the covers or titles below to link to The Chicago Manual of Style (available online), or to locate the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (print copy available in the library).

This study compared four formats for safety messages in printed manuals based on layouts found in a new standard of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI Z535.6, 2006). These four designs are specifically for use as section safety messages. Two used a signal word panel, and two used a safety alert symbol (exclamation in a triangle). The four formats were rated by 55 college students from three different classes using a five-point scale for hazardousness. All four messages were presented on the same page of a test booklet, with order balanced using a Latin Square. Results of a Friedman test indicated significant differences in ratings. The ranked order of the formats based on estimated median was yellow safety alert symbol left of the text (3.37), signal word in black panel above text (3.13), signal word in black panel imbedded in first line of text (2.87), and black hazard alert symbol left of the text (2.13). Post-hoc analyses of ratings using a Bonferroni test indicated the signs fit into three groups: the two highest rated signs, the second and third rated signs, and the lowest rated sign.

3a8082e126