Running secureGraph on an accumulo cluster

[vaibhav thapliyal]

Dear all,

I am trying to run the Secure Graph API on a multi-node(3 nodes) Accumulo cluster. When I run my code from a node inside the cluster it works fine, but when I use the same code on a machine which is not a node in the cluster the code fails to do anything and exits with this message in the console:

"WARN: Failed to find an available server from a list of servers."

The machine fails to connect to the zookeeper servers.

Has anybody encountered this problem?

Any help would be useful.

Thanks and Regards,
Vaibhav

[Joe Ferner]

Here is the configuration I use to connect to a server.

graph=org.securegraph.accumulo.AccumuloGraph

graph.accumuloInstanceName=lumify

graph.username=root

graph.password=password

graph.tableNamePrefix=lumify_securegraph

graph.zookeeperServers=192.168.33.10

graph.serializer=org.securegraph.accumulo.serializer.JavaValueSerializer

graph.idgenerator=org.securegraph.id.UUIDIdGenerator

graph.search=org.securegraph.elasticsearch.ElasticSearchParentChildSearchIndex

graph.search.indexEdges=false

graph.search.locations=192.168.33.10

graph.search.indexName=securegraph

graph.search.storeSourceData=false

graph.hdfs.rootDir=hdfs://192.168.33.10

graph.hdfs.dataDir=/lumify/secureGraph

                                            

Can you post your configuration so we can compare.

[Jayasree Atmakuru]

Hi Joe ,
   "graph.search.locations=192.168.33.10"
What is graph location means?
I have hdfs root dir as : hdfs://127.0.0.1
and zookeeper as : localhost.

Which on I should give for this property?

Please reply soon.

[Joe Ferner]

graph.search.locations is a list of ElasticSearch IPs.

SecureGraph uses two data stores. Accumulo for storing the data, graph, vertices, edges, etc. And ElasticSearch for storing a search index to allow full text searching of your graph. If you don't need searching you can change "graph.search" to "org.securegraph.search.DefaultSearchIndex".

On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 7:54:58 AM UTC-5, vaibhav thapliyal wrote: