>>>>> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:50:05 -0600
>>>>> Nathan Whitehorn <nwhit...@freebsd.org> said:
nwhitehorn> As a result of importing 32-bit compatibility support for non-x86 64-bit
nwhitehorn> platforms, the kernel options COMPAT_IA32 has been renamed
nwhitehorn> COMPAT_FREEBSD32 in revision 205014, so all kernel configurations
nwhitehorn> including this option must be modified accordingly.
Doesn't this mean we cannot have FreeBSD version 32? :)
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
u...@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
> Hi,
>
>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:50:05 -0600
>>>>>> Nathan Whitehorn <nwhit...@freebsd.org> said:
>
> nwhitehorn> As a result of importing 32-bit compatibility support for non-x86 64-bit
> nwhitehorn> platforms, the kernel options COMPAT_IA32 has been renamed
> nwhitehorn> COMPAT_FREEBSD32 in revision 205014, so all kernel configurations
> nwhitehorn> including this option must be modified accordingly.
>
> Doesn't this mean we cannot have FreeBSD version 32? :)
Think like the U.S. government and push the problem off to the
great*N-grandchildren. ;)
Sean
--
s...@FreeBSD.org