How to apply strain rate a tensile Test

213 views
Skip to first unread message

Doğan ACAR

unread,
Mar 9, 2022, 6:28:01 AM3/9/22
to LS-DYNA2
Dear all,
I am modeling a tensile test for various strain rate values. Ia prepared the material models for johnson cook and MAT 24 with Cowper Symond. But I cannot I understand how to apply strain rate. For example for applying a strain rate @ 1x10^-3 and then I increase the strain rate 10 times and make it 1x10^-2. Between the two models, what should I change? 
Thanks you in advance for your help

Doğan


l...@schwer.net

unread,
Mar 9, 2022, 9:52:19 AM3/9/22
to Doğan ACAR, LS-DYNA2

The easiest way to prescribe strain rate is using prescribed velocity.

 

Strain = displacement / length

Strain rate = strain / time = displacement / (length * time) = velocity / length

 

Where length is the length of your tensile specimen.

 

This will provide an approximate strain rate – as the length of the specimen changes under deformation the resulting strain rate will decrease.

 

               --len

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "LS-DYNA2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ls-dyna2+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ls-dyna2/292f0f16-d613-458b-9d45-0370632514ben%40googlegroups.com.

Doğan ACAR

unread,
Mar 11, 2022, 12:13:14 PM3/11/22
to LS-DYNA2
Dear Len,

Firstly thanks a lot for your answer. 
Can you please confirm or reject my approach detailed below?

Strain rate: SR =V/L       
L: gage length (mm)  
V= velocity of moving end (mm/s)

V1=2 mm/min,   V2= 20 mm/min   and   L=20 mm (constant of course)

Therefore SR1= 0.0017 1/s and SR2=0.017 1/s 

When I increase the V1 to V2 should I decrease the termination time 10 times?
My termination time is 0.001 s. 
Another issue confusing me is...> with this termination time my sample does not achieve the supposed displacement to failure.  If I increase the termination time, the analysis take so much time to solve?

Any suggestions are much appreciated.

Best regards
Doğan


9 Mart 2022 Çarşamba tarihinde saat 17:52:19 UTC+3 itibarıyla L...@Schwer.net şunları yazdı:

James M. Kennedy

unread,
Mar 12, 2022, 3:52:28 PM3/12/22
to Doğan ACAR, LS-DYNA2

Dear Dogan,

 

In general, if you increase the velocity of the moving end of the specimen, you can hope to

decrease the termination time needed to capture the primary response of the test specimen.

 

---------------------------------------

 

Anders Jernberg of ERAB provided this very nice presentation regarding termination time

and the possible role of mass scaling:

 

The first rule is that you wish to set it to as low as possible to reduce simulation time. There

are basically two reasons for why the termination become a certain value.

 

(1) You might want to simulate some short (in time) physical phenomena where dynamic

effects are essential for the behavior, like car crash, hitting a golf ball or whatever. Here you

have to estimate for how long you need to perform the simulation to catch the behavior you

wish to analyze. That estimation sets the termination time.

 

(2) You wish to perform an analysis where you don't want the inertia effects to affect the

results, like applying a static load to a structure. Running the explicit solver and applying the

load too fast you will get inertia effects that changes the structural response. Applying a load

very fast, and it finally becomes more like an impact simulation. I believe the best way to apply

a load for (explicit) static analysis is to ramp it up to the final load using a half sine function

shape for the load. The duration for the ramp-up time to get reasonable small kinetic energy

compared to internal energy correlates to the eigenfrequency of the system. A minimum reason-

able ramp-up time for quasi static analysis is 1.5-2.0 times the normal period (1./frequency) of

the system. That sets the termination time in this case.

 

You can reduce the CPU time by specifying mass scaling. For quasi-static analysis, I believe

selective mass scaling is superior. It will not let you set shorter termination time but the time

step can be larger.

 

---------------------------------------

 

Sincerely,

James M. Kennedy

KBS2 Inc.

March 12, 2022

 

 

From: ls-d...@googlegroups.com [mailto:ls-d...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dogan ACAR
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2022 5:28 AM
To: LS-DYNA2 <ls-d...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [LS-DYNA2] How to apply strain rate a tensile Test

 

Dear all,

 

 

--

Doğan ACAR

unread,
Mar 21, 2022, 11:44:41 AM3/21/22
to LS-DYNA2
Dear James,
Thank you very much for the quick response. I will examine everything you shared. 

Regards
Doğan 

12 Mart 2022 Cumartesi tarihinde saat 23:52:28 UTC+3 itibarıyla jmk şunları yazdı:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages