calculating LQ needs always the estimation of the number of contributors. My request about that is: What happens when you’re wrong?
E.g.: in our lab we had tested a family of two parents and four children touching varying items. The clou was that we knew in advance who had touched what.
We also generated mixtures from members of the family + one or two non relative persons.
In the end scientist tried to decipher the mixtures. And what to say? It didn’t come that easy for sure. Mostly mixtures looked like two person mixtures but where touched by more than two relatives.
So with this possibility of misinterpretation there is a risk two underestimate the number of contributors.
(On the other hand, when you falsely include stutters, or you even don’t know, the number can be higher than it has to be.)
So what is the result on the perspective of defense when you underestimate the number of related contributors in your calculation? Is that an issue?
(for overestimation it should be in the interest of defense I guess J)
What do think about?
Best
Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "LRmix Studio user group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lrmix-studio-user-group+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lrmix-studio-user-group@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lrmix-studio-user-group/73eba8bf-c6b9-41ef-bd23-159b5b5b892b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.