While Phil is absolutely correct, this could be handled with AlignmentObject, it is in fact a "bit of a kludge". I'm not so sure I'd give up on pushing for the addition of an "educationLevel" property. Nothing says that the current LRMI extension is sufficiently complete. The need for educationLevel has good grounding. It has been a Dublin Core property since 2002  and it is one of the most frequently used of the Dublin Core enducaiton properties. Both instructors and learners think and speak in terms of their controlling education level scheme--they don't speak in terms of typical age range.
Admittedly, the values for such a property are context dependent (i.e., there is no universal education level scheme). But nothing says that such educationLevel schemes can't be mapped to typical age ranges.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Learning Resource Metadata Initiative" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lrmi+uns...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.