You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to LPSU
Just a quick thought, ran a few numbers and at 110,000 feet you would need a field of view of about 170 degrees to capture the whole earth in a single shot. And that would be with a perfectly centered shot.
ohm...@pdx.edu
unread,
Apr 6, 2007, 2:04:28 AM4/6/07
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to LPSU
I cant figure out how to add to the other discussion, but I think that a DSLR camera is really what we need for this job. the nikon P5000 is only capable of producing images of 20x30 in. If we are going to try to get 3 images together, I think that we might want the ability to produce large poster size images of great quality. I found that "at 17.1 oz. Rebel XT, currently the lightest digital SLR on the market," on http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/content/Canon-Digital-Rebel-XT-Digital-Camera-Review-/Conclusion.htm and there is a 20mm lens for it that weighs in at 14.3 oz http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelDetailAct&fcategoryid=151&modelid=7301 9 out of 10 people will tell you that canon has the highest quality lenses, a big factor in image quality. Although using this camera/ lens comb will be more costly, I think that if we have enough "room" (can take the weight), then our images will be much more impersive.
-Ben
Ben
unread,
May 2, 2007, 12:23:30 PM5/2/07
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to LPSU
OK, so I called Nikon to get a recommendation on memory cards and this is what I found out: - Use SanDisk or Toshiba (he Strongly recommended SanDisk) - Make sure it is SDHC - Do NOT go over 4G - 4G cards start at $100 and go to $140 for the most durable. http://www.sandisk.com/Products/Catalog(1039)-SanDisk_SD_Cards.aspx
Ben
unread,
May 2, 2007, 12:28:22 PM5/2/07
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to LPSU
Also, He said that if we are using a 2G card to make sure it is high speed (10MB/s or 20MB/s). Panasonic is also listed on p. 91 of the User's Manual as being an acceptable brand.
Ben
unread,
May 2, 2007, 5:34:27 PM5/2/07
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to LPSU
Justin and I need input on the time interval that we want to take pics at. -For a 2G card we get approx 400 images at the highest quality. for a rise rate of 1000ft/min that is 7200 sec of fly time if we get to 120000ft. that corresponds to 1 pic every 18 sec or 300ft. -For 4G we get approx 800 images, which is i pic every 9 sec or every 150 ft. That is if we take pics continuously the whole way up. --Ben--