The following is being sent as a courtesy on behalf of VCPORA:
T O M O R R O W Habana Outpost – Possible Final Vote by Vieux Carre Commission TODAY Wednesday, September 4 1:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers ** PLEASE ATTEND**
(note:
this is the most recent drawing made available. There have been slight
modifications to the project that are not reflected here.)
After months of meetings by the VCC, mostly at the
Architectural Committee, the proposed project at the corner of Esplanade
and N. Rampart will go before the full commission on Wednesday, September 4 at 1:30 p.m. in City Council Chambers
VCPORA has been tracking this project ever since it was first
announced last summer. After much review, research and consideration,
we voted to oppose the project for three reasons: architectural changes
we believed to be inappropriate; consolidation of properties and
obliteration of historic property lines; and concerns that the operation
of the establishment might not conform to city requirements.
Over the past few months, the developer has worked with the VCC
staff and made modifications the plans, but nothing substantive that
responds to our concerns. It still involves the consolidation of 2
properties and the use of a third via an easement. Its legal seating
capacity is still well over 400, most of that outside. The overarching
issue about the intensity of the proposed use and its effect on the
surrounding area have not been addressed.
What
makes this meeting so important, more important than any of the
previous meetings, is that for the first time, the commission will be
considering whether to approve the requested change of use.
That may not be a term familiar to many people so let us explain: when
the VCC considers requests to change the use of a property, - vacant to
residential, retail to cocktail lounge, etc. – there must be a special
hearing. Even in cases where the proposed use is in compliance with the
zoning code, the VCC must look at additional criteria. Below is the
text of Section 8.1 of the city’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.
No
occupancy permit shall be issued by the Director of Safety and Permits,
for any change in the use of any existing building until and unless a
special permit shall have been issued by the Vieux Carré Commission,
except that where no change of exterior appearance is contemplated such
permit by the Vieux Carré Commission shall not be required. Where any
change in exterior appearance is contemplated, the Vieux Carré
Commission shall hold a hearing, and if it approves such change, it
shall issue a special permit to continue the same use, or for any other
use not otherwise prohibited in this district, subject to the following
conditions and safeguards:
1. The historic character of the Vieux Carré shall not be injuriously affected.
2. Signs which are garish or otherwise out of keeping with the character of the Vieux Carré shall not be permitted.
3. Building designs shall be in harmony with the traditional architectural character of the Vieux Carré.
4. The value of the Vieux Carré as a place of unique interest and character shall not be impaired.
This
project comprises three parcels. It is an outdoor commercial venue in
an almost exclusively residential section of the French Quarter. Its
sheer size, spread over three lots, is out of character for the
neighborhood, and that is one reason that the VCC routinely denies
applications to consolidate multiple lots into single lots of record.
More importantly, the outdoor nature, and in particular the second floor
outdoor use, is completely out of character for this historic
neighborhood. Such an establishment would be idea for another location,
one in a more commercial area, or not surrounded by dense historic
residential uses. But the nature of this business, which the
applicant has suggested would include outdoor movies, weddings, and
other special events, and its current and potential capacity – almost
all of which would be outdoors – would absolutely injure the historic character of the Vieux Carre and impair its value as a place of unique interest and character.
In our opinion, this project does not meet the standards set forth in Section 8.1.
Let us be clear: our opposition is not to a restaurant at this
location; it is to the specifics of this proposed establishment at this
location.