Global Mapper V9.01

1 view
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

Ashlie Hagenson

unread,
Jul 9, 2024, 4:51:24 AM7/9/24
to lostyvare

Description:The OziExplorer waypoint (WPT), route (RTE), and track (PLT) file formats are used to store user waypoints, routes, and track logs from GPS devices by the OziExplorer application. The WPT and TRK files can be loaded into Global Mapper v6.00 and above, and the RTE files can be loaded into v9.01 and above.

Global Mapper V9.01


Download Zip ===> https://ckonti.com/2yVCYa



Exception DetailsSystem.ArgumentException, System.Private.CoreLib, Version=5.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=7cec85d7bea7798e: An item with the same key has already been added. Key: paStacktraceat System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary2.TryInsert(TKey key, TValue value, InsertionBehavior behavior) at System.Linq.Enumerable.ToDictionary[TSource,TKey,TElement](IEnumerable1 source, Func2 keySelector, Func2 elementSelector, IEqualityComparer1 comparer) at System.Linq.Enumerable.ToDictionary[TSource,TKey,TElement](IEnumerable1 source, Func2 keySelector, Func2 elementSelector)at Umbraco.Cms.Web.BackOffice.Controllers.LanguageController.GetAllCultures()at lambdamethod488(Closure , Object , Object[] )at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ActionMethodExecutor.SyncObjectResultExecutor.Execute(IActionResultTypeMapper mapper, ObjectMethodExecutor executor, Object controller, Object[] arguments)at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethodAsync()at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.Next(State& next, Scope& scope, Object& state, Boolean& isCompleted)at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeNextActionFilterAsync()--- End of stack trace from previous location ---at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.Rethrow(ActionExecutedContextSealed context)at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.Next(State& next, Scope& scope, Object& state, Boolean& isCompleted)at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeInnerFilterAsync()--- End of stack trace from previous location ---at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ResourceInvoker.gAwaited250(ResourceInvoker invoker, Task lastTask, State next, Scope scope, Object state, Boolean isCompleted)

Everything working fine for Automapper 8.1.1 but with version 9.0.0 context.Items throws a System.InvalidOperationException (see images above) so I am not sure if this is a bug or not.

Customers must transition to using the global OData V4 Discovery Service before April 21, 2021 so their applications aren't impacted. More information: Modify your code to use global Discovery Service.

Step up the Target Framework Migrator. This little gem takes the time and hassle out of upgrading each project by hand by going into the project properties and selecting the new version. I then went through and carried out a global find and replace on any Assembly bindings making reference to .NET 4.6.2.

It is a good idea when upgrading to compare the current web.config to a standard OOTB web config for the current version. So I did this for v9.01 and noted that there were many customisations present. I then compared new 9.3 web.config with the 9.0.1 web.config and brought across the necessary changes.e.g. in the 9.1 release a change was made to the node for the Identity Server changes, and so that needed to be carefully merged in as:

The use of Persistent Identifiers (PIDs) including Globally Unique Identifiers (GUIDs), Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) etc. for uniquely identifying individual objects and other classes of data (such as collections, observations, images, and locations) are under discussion. It is important that any identifiers used are globally unique (applied to exactly one instance of an identifiable object), persistent, and resolvable (Page 2009, Richards 2010, Richards et al. 2011). As yet, very few institutions use PIDs for specimens, and even fewer for locations, however a recent paper by Nelson et al. 2018 makes a number of recommendations on minting, managing and sharing GUIDs for herbarium specimens. We recommend that once a stable system for assigning and using PIDs is implemented, it be used wherever practical, including for locations.

Geographic coordinates are a convenient way to define a location in a way that is not only more specific than is otherwise possible with a locality description, but also readily allows calculations to be made in a GIS. Geographic coordinates can be expressed in a number of different coordinate formats (decimal degrees, degrees minutes seconds, degrees decimal minutes), with decimal degrees being the most commonly used. Geographic coordinates in decimal degrees are convenient for georeferencing because this succinct format has global applicability and relies on just three attributes, one for latitude, one for longitude, and one for the geodetic datum or ellipsoid, which, together with the coordinate format, make up the coordinate reference system. By keeping the number of recorded attributes to a minimum, the chances for transcription errors are minimized (Wieczorek et al. 2004).

Precise Point Positioning (PPP) depends on GNSS satellite clock and orbit corrections, generated from a network of global reference stations to remove GNSS system error and provide a high level (decimeter) of positional accuracy. Once the corrections are calculated, they are delivered to the end user via satellite or over the Internet.

Although similar to Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS) systems (see above), they generally provide a greater accuracy and have the advantage of providing a single, global reference stream as opposed to the regional nature of an SBAS system. Whereas SBAS is free, the use of PPP usually incurs a charge to access the corrections, so it is unlikely that the increased accuracy of PPP when compared to that of SBAS, will be a consideration for most biological applications.

Since 2003, the most commonly used global coverage of bathymetry has been the One Minute General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans (GEBCO 2019a), however, in 2019, a much finer, and more detailed, 15 arc-second grid coverage was released (GEBCO 2019b). The 3,732,480,000 grids (86,400 rows by 43,200 columns) cover from 8959'52.5'' N, 17959'52.5'' W to 8959'52.5'' S, 17959'52.5'' E, with elevation given for each pixel center. There are many criteria that determine the vertical accuracy of these grids, including the presence of steep canyons, water depth and turbidity (affects instrument penetration and acoustic beams get wider, the deeper they go), and methodology (satellite, single beam echo sounders (SES), multibeam echo sounders (MES), airborne laser (LADS), Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR), etc.) (Wolf et al. 2019).

Bathymetric contours have generally only been available for harbors, coastal and near inshore areas, in some places extending to the edges of the continental slope. Where bathymetric contours (also called depth contours or isobaths) do exist, they are generally quite coarse (except in areas like the North Sea, and in harbors), and get wider apart as the depth increases. For example, the 2009 bathymetric contours for Australia are at 20 m, 40 m, 100 m, 200 m and 400 m. In some harbors, the contour interval is as small as one meter (Data.gov.au 2018). In 2019, the GEBCO_2019 global bathymetric contour dataset was derived from the GEBCO_2019 15 arc-second grid mentioned above. At large scales (1:5,000,000 and closer), the contour interval is 500 m; at medium scales (1:5,000,000 to 1:30,000,000) the contour interval is 1000 m; and at small scales (1:30,000,000 and greater), the contour interval is 2000 meters. Supplementary contours are shown in shallow waters (less than 500 m) (NCEI-NOAA 2019).

The Notes from Nature project (Zooniverse n.d.) gives people the opportunity to make scientifically important contributions toward the goal of conserving and making available knowledge about natural and cultural heritage. "Every transcription that is completed brings us closer to filling gaps in our knowledge of global biodiversity and natural heritage". It is very similar to DigiVol. Currently, there are no georeferencing projects (expeditions) in Notes from Nature, but there are plans to develop this in the future.

EPSG codes are defined by the International Association of Oil and Gas Producers, using a spatial reference identifier (SRID) to reference spatial reference systems. The EPSG Geodetic Parameter Dataset (IOPG 2019) is a collection of definitions of coordinate reference systems (including datums) and coordinate transformations which may be global, regional, national or local in application.

Global Navigation Satellite System, the generic term for satellite navigation systems that provide global autonomous geo-spatial positioning. This term encompasses GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou and other regional systems.

World Geodetic System 1984, a popular globally-used horizontal geodetic coordinate reference system (EPSG:4326) upon which raw GPS measurements are based (though a GPS receiver is capable of delivering coordinates in other reference systems). The term is also commonly used for the geodetic datum used by that system and for the ellipsoid (EPSG:7030) upon which that datum (EPSG:6326) is based.

Using Device Mapper Multipath with the nvme-tcp driver can result in the Call Trace warnings and system instability. To work around this problem, NVMe/TCP users must enable native NVMe multipathing and not use the device-mapper-multipath tools with NVMe.

Due to a bug, global referral mode does not work in Directory Server. If you start the ns-slapd process with the refer option as the dirsrv user, Directory Server ignores the port settings and terminates unexpectedly. Trying to run the process as the root user changes SELinux labels and prevents the service from starting in future in normal mode. There are no workarounds available.

In previous versions, introspection endpoint automatically returned most claims, which were available in the access token. Now there is newswitch Add to token introspection on most of protocol mappers. This addition allows more flexibility as introspection endpoint can return differentclaims than access token. This is first step towards "Lightweight access tokens" support as access tokens can omit lots of the claims, which would be still returnedby the introspection endpoint. When migrating from previous versions, the introspection endpoint should return same claims, which are returned from access token,so the behavior should be effectively the same by default after the migration. Thanks to Shigeyuki Kabano for the contribution.

aa06259810
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages