Draft 84

[Oliver Parkes]

Whilethere is currently no draft, registration with the Selective Service System is the most publicly visible program during peacetime that ensures operational readiness in a fair and equitable manner. If authorized by the President and Congress, our Agency would rapidly provide personnel to the Department of Defense while at the same time providing an Alternative Service Program for conscientious objectors.

Selective Service registration is required by law as the first part of a fair and equitable system that, if authorized by the President and Congress, would rapidly provide personnel to the Department of Defense while at the same time providing for an Alternative Service Program for conscientious objectors. By registering, a young man remains eligible for jobs, state-based student aid in 31 states, Federally-funded job training, and U.S. citizenship for immigrant men.

On June 12, 2024, the White House, along with EPA, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration released the "National Strategy for Reducing Food Loss and Waste and Recycling Organics." This strategy is part of a series of strategies on building a more circular economy for all.

The goal of the strategy is to prevent the loss and waste of food and increase recycling of food and other organic materials, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, save households and businesses money, and build cleaner, healthier communities.

Preventing food loss and waste and recycling food and other organic waste will also reduce landfill methane emissions, in support of the "U.S. Methane Emissions Reduction Action Plan" (pdf)(1.465 MB).

In December 2023, EPA, USDA, and FDA released for public comment the "Draft Strategy for Reducing Food Loss and Waste and Recycling Organics." The comment period closed on February 3, 2024. During the public comment period, EPA, USDA, and FDA encouraged the public to consider the following key questions when reviewing and commenting on the draft strategy:

EPA, USDA, and FDA reviewed all comments received. Please visit the docket for this draft in Regulations.gov (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OLEM-2022-0415) to view submitted comments or for information related to the docket.

A wide range of external partners submitted more than 10,327 comments on the draft strategy. Commenters included industries and trade organizations, national and community-based non-profit organizations, government agencies (e.g., federal, state, local, and tribal), and private individuals.

Each summer at The Athletic, I re-draft the class of three years prior and begin to review my draft board relative to the draft order. The goal is twofold: providing you with updated evaluations of the players and measuring where I was on each of them relative to NHL teams in order to test what I got right and wrong.

In an effort to make the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations clearer and its processes more transparent, the Task Force started posting draft Recommendation Statements online for public comment in 2009. To further enhance its work, the Task Force began inviting public comment on all its draft Research Plans in December 2011 and its draft Evidence Reviews in March 2013. Submitted comments will be handled on a confidential basis.

A small group of USPSTF members, called topic leads, works with researchers from the Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) to create a draft Research Plan to guide the systematic review of the evidence. The Research Plan consists of an analytic framework, key questions, and a literature search strategy or research approach.

Each draft Research Plan is posted for public comment for 4 weeks. The USPSTF topic leads, with the assistance of the EPC researchers, review all of the comments received, revise the draft plan, and develop a final Research Plan. The final Research Plan is then posted on this Web site.

The research team at the EPC independently implements the final Research Plan by conducting a systematic review of the evidence to address the questions posed by the USPSTF. The research team presents a draft Evidence Review to the full USPSTF at one of its in-person meetings. After the meeting, each draft Evidence Review is shared with a panel of external subject matter experts and posted for public comment for 4 weeks. Based on feedback received from Task Force members, subject matter experts, and the public, the research team finalizes the Evidence Review and prepares a manuscript summarizing the evidence for publication in a peer-reviewed journal or on this Web site.

The USPSTF, in partnership with AHRQ's Effective Health Care (EHC) Program, also offers opportunities for public comment on EHC draft Evidence Reviews that are related to the USPSTF's work. To learn more about and comment on draft Evidence Reviews from AHRQ's EHC Program, visit -involved/draft-comments.

During one of its in-person meetings, the entire USPSTF reviews the evidence, evaluates the benefits and harms of the clinical preventive service, and discusses and develops one or more specific recommendations.

After the meeting, the topic leads write a full draft Recommendation Statement that includes the specific recommendations of the entire USPSTF, a rationale section, a section of clinical considerations to guide health care professionals, and a discussion section that reviews the evidence and discusses the recommendations of other organizations. The USPSTF posts its draft Recommendation Statement on this Web site for public comment for 4 weeks. The USPSTF topic leads review all of the comments received and revise the draft Recommendation Statement. The final Recommendation Statement is reviewed and voted on by the full Task Force, and posted on this Web site.

Any visitor to this site can comment on any of the listed USPSTF draft documents. However, readers should note that the USPSTF writes these documents for researchers, primary care doctors, and other health care providers, using medical and scientific language as appropriate for these audiences.

To comment, click on the type of draft document in the box at top right. Comments must be received before the comment deadline listed below each title. The comment period for draft documents is 4 weeks.

Once the draft Research Plan, Evidence Review, or Recommendation Statement is removed from the public comment page, the USPSTF begins considering comments and finalizing the document. Until the final Recommendation Statement is published, the USPSTF considers the Recommendation Statements on this Web site to be current.

I had apparently started a message within a channel, but never finished it. Now the Channel name shows [Draft] after it. However, I can't find the draft message to delete or send it. How can I find this message and remove the Draft notation?

Yes. New target release for a section to contain Drafts and Scheduled messages is targeting release later in September 5.16.0 release. In the left side rail, there should also be an indicator if there is a draft in your chat/channel.

I found it by scrolling back to May 4th (its August 22nd) and was able to easily delete it at that point, but there should be a much easier way to locate it than scrolling and hoping to see the not blue, not grey, not picture message box!

This is not an acceptable "solution" to the issue. To echo one of the users above, as well as the frustration of many others in my organization (which is probably in your top 10 corporate customers), there should be an option to clear draft messages without having to scroll back several days/weeks/months. If the functionality has been added that you are alluding to "...section to contain Drafts and Scheduled messages is targeting release later in September..." please provide a route to utilize this function.

@mrice69 Are you on the build of 5.16.0 or later? If so, there is a Drafts section in the top-left rail of the Zoom Team Chat client. This will show you all of your draft messages. On that screen is a toggle to flip over to view your scheduled messages too. That would allow you easy access to any drafts you started in any chat/channel without the need to find and scroll. Looks like this.

A HubSpot user wants to be able to managel the Client from the client timeline and communicate with them from that window, including email. Without draft emails auto saving, sometimes a browser crash (not uncommon) will rob me of 10-60 minutes of work, depending on the detail in the email.

I've developed a habit of frequent CTRL-V slaps during emails to help mitigate this, but surely this can be a nice customer-centric feature for HUBSPOT to add to their otherwise excellent CRM platform.

@hubspot @jjohn

I would very much like to echo this idea of the ability to save a draft in any email, service crm, marketing and sales. As many have mentioned:

- When composing an email and another more pressing item comes up, you come back to that mailer and hours of investigative reporting is now lost - most frustrating.

- new or junoir employees often need their emails reviewed by a more senoir person. this is not possible.

- drafts also need to be composed over days when investigative work is being done.

- the idea is to have one integrated platform, not working off multiple programs, that is why many of us made the shift to have a centralised crm.

I have been reading through all the comments and upvotes, what is scary is this feature request has been asked for since 2017 (as far as i can see) it is 3 years later and you are still asking us to upvote for product managers to notice the request.

1. How many more upvotes or requests do you need for this feature to be bulit?

2. Many of us are paying a lot to use this platform and it is alarming that a feature so simple / obvious, that is also provided for in just about every crm platform, is not avalible and after 2 years still not built.

I look forward to your reply and trust this will be addressed asap.

Many thanks

Ps I have submitted this on the Ideas Forum Submission as Hubspot clearly makes it difficult for feature resquests to heard.

3a8082e126