Christian-Marxist Dialogue: On Continuing to Read Phil McShane
Phil McShane who I’ve come to regard as a revolutionary Lonerganian despite the fact he usually rejected the attribution of being a Lonerganian, said in his final years that the necessary transition period ahead of us demands for most of us a commitment to think and point, and to even teach beyond our own present competence.
He added that a major problem in our present culture is that the vast majority of those teaching in the humanities and the sciences were/are not prepared for the shocking cultural lift involved in Lonergan's GEM methodology ….
To give content to this very general claim … McShane would return repeatedly to the problems of financial capitalism as, for him, the worst-case illustration of cultural decline for our time. It is a situation that emerges in the light and darkness of dialectic crying out for cosmopolis, for some alternative methodological order. Despite such ‘cries’ this ‘business’ … this ‘finance’ is not about the science of economics or economy but about ‘gambling-casino’ possibilities.
Some ‘painful transition’ is required and necessary here – is it not? … some transition having to do with the regulation and control over money as a public utility?
This I suggest was the materialist heart of McShane’s strange little booklet “The Road to Religious Reality” (Axial Publishing, 2012) ….
Does John and Pierre’s text – “Attentive, Intelligent, Reasonable, and Responsible” have a position on this?
Hugh
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lonergan_L" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lonergan_l+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lonergan_l/b54761a7-9f06-49ea-9c90-4220d1376740%40nbnet.nb.ca.
thanks Pierre
for a very succinct
and on point response ...
Hugh
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lonergan_l/6ED0629A-6314-4751-98B8-97E0B8CB1AC3%40aol.com.
Pierre,
let me add that as I laid my head down to rest
... I had a flash of insight because of your good and succinct response below.
as essential or sound as Lonergan's analytical framework is for understanding
the "two circuit economic law" to which we must adapt if we are to have a functioning economy,
Lonergan's theory of economy does not provide an adequate account of the political context for its realization,
so we have in effect an incomplete social theory. (Your AIRR text helped me to see this ...)
Thus perhaps the need for dialogue with marxism to help provide for that
in a way that ideologically holds up the priority of labor and not of capital (as we now have in much of the West),
i.e., capital is to serve labor.
This as I understand it would in the most general terms be in the best of the tradition of Popes Francis and Leo xiv
referenced earlier by John ....
Hugh
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lonergan_l/15d3a61c-6b77-4d7d-8f0d-bb591d60c427%40nbnet.nb.ca.