> On Wednesday, 12 June 2013 12:30:58 UTC+1, Sci wrote:
>
> Well I've got it here. Was going to see if it's possible to remove the
> cover & check the condition of the tube. I don't hear any glass loose
> inside, but there's a big dent in the interface end indicating it's had
> an hard impact at some point, so there is the risk that it's UTA.
>
>
> You may already know this but worth pointing out that PMTs don't like
> being exposed to daylight, and if there is a scintillator crystal in
> front some of these are sealed as they are made from a seriously
> hygroscopic and/or toxic substance.
The unit seems fairly sealed. What I presume is a front aperture is
covered by washers and electrical tape. The crystal enclosure appears to
be seized in place and I'm currently unwilling to apply force to it.
More than 2 decades old though, I'm not going to hold out a lot of hope
for it being usable.
I know PMTs don't like being exposed to natural light levels while
running. Funny story I was told while at a job making MCP-based PMTs,
was an overseas customer returning their tube due to it being "broken".
When tested the lab techs found a perfect image of the customer's lab
burnt into the screen.
I was never involved in the production of monolithic anode
photon-counters, but the PMTs I made were fine at natural light-levels
as long as they weren't powered.
>
> Gather it uses a 10-stage photomultiplier tube. Surprisingly low
> voltage
> (marked at 750v).
>
>
> I've got a growing pile of PMTs here and keep meaning to have a go at
> building a power supply based on a CCFL inverter, e.g:
>
>
http://charliethompson.50megs.com/LowRippleHVsupply.html
That would certainly be good. Opens up the option for
rebuilding/repairing it or other sensing tubes.