I think the new look is because Yahoo loosened its grip on Flickr to
be honest. I just don't particularly like the new look, mostly because
there's no intelligence in the contacts' photo display - it should be
like FB newsfeed and feature the people with whom you exchange
comments first and so on. I miss the bit of home screen where I can
see the comments that have been left on my photos as well. They seem
to be demoting social aspects. The comments bit on the original home
page should have been re-written to allow you to respond to the
comments right on the home page instead of having to go to the photos
page. Likewise they should make groups as much of the home page as
friends pics.
I guess in the new-media aping it's more Pinterest than Facebook
they're going after...
On 5/26/13, Jane Hobson <
hobso...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a nascent account on ipernity too - I'll move over properly if
> Seaside Appreciation Society, The Usual Suspects and Flickr Meetups groups
> move over as the only reason I'm still on Flickr is for arranging seaside
> trips! (It used to be because Flickr had great SEO, which drove traffic to
> my website....)
>
> As of the day the switchover was made I downgraded to free, deleted all my
> contacts (to stop the home page problems and to stop my work polluting the
> home pages of others) and made all my work private. I have no intention of
> driving advertising revenue for them on the back of my professional work,
> especially given Ms Meyer doesn't believe professionals exist now!
>
> I have this niggling feeling that the reason that they went to the
> ridiculous 'justified' photostream layout is because their real clients are
> not us, but picture editors/buyers, searching for content to license for
> peanuts (hence the previous, ridiculous, Getty licensing fiasco). It looks
> shit for our work, but will enable someone searching for a specific image
> to do so faster. That's why they are never going to listen to our rational
> arguments about negative space being necessary to appreciate each
> individual photograph. It's irrelevant to them. They don't *want* each
> <
http://www.janehobson.com/>
http://janehobson.wordpress.com/
> 07798 794205