zo {ge'e} cmavo ma?

[Gleki Arxokuna]

mi stidi lo nu zo ge'e cmavo la'oi CAI

i CyLyLy cu ciroi cusku zo'e pe zo ge'e i sa'e 

http://dag.github.io/cll/13/8/

http://dag.github.io/cll/13/13/

http://dag.github.io/cll/13/10/

<quote>Another use for “ge'e” is to explicitly avoid expressing one’s feeling on a given scale; in this use, it functions like a member of selma'o CAI: “.iige'e” means roughly “I’m not telling whether I’m afraid or not.”</quote>

iseki'ubo mi stidi

[Jacob Errington]

But it really seems like ge'e sees more use as a UI than as a CAI. Seems like ge'e should be the UI and we make up a new cmavo in CAI to mean "unspecific attitudinal scale point."

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

[Gleki Arxokuna]

isnt it na'i?

El 30/12/2013 20:56, "Jacob Errington" <nict...@gmail.com> escribió:

But it really seems like ge'e sees more use as a UI than as a CAI. Seems like ge'e should be the UI and we make up a new cmavo in CAI to mean "unspecific attitudinal scale point."

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban zasni" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban-zasni...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-zasni.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[Jorge Llambías]

On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:

mi stidi lo nu zo ge'e cmavo la'oi CAI

la'oi UI la'oi CAI dunli lo ka gerna .i na mutce vajni fa lo du'u da cmavo lo pa moi ji kau lo re moi .i .ei selma'o pa mei 

mu'o mi'e xorxes

[Gleki Arxokuna]

If ge'e belongs to UI

ii ge'e = I fear and i dont want to share my (probably other) feelings with you.

but if it belongs to CAI/NAI then

ii ge'e = I won't tell whether I {.ii}, {iinai} or {.iicu'i}

so it's important to define where {ge'e} belongs to.

[Jorge Llambías]

On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:

If ge'e belongs to UI

ii ge'e = I fear and i dont want to share my (probably other) feelings with you.

but if it belongs to CAI/NAI then

ii ge'e = I won't tell whether I {.ii}, {iinai} or {.iicu'i}

so it's important to define where {ge'e} belongs to.

That has to do with the semantics of ge'e, not with its syntax. Selma'o only determine the syntax of words. The syntax of UI and CAI is identical, so they should really be a single selma'o, possibly with subselma'o groupings based on semantics (as UI1, UI2, etc).

And BTW, UI are not always about feelings.