Re: Tor Browser V 1.3.26 (Portable)
Arnaud Richardson
However, scrolling down the to file name, it is listed as brave-v1.37.116-win32-ia32.zip. Sure enough, it is a portable version of the latest Brave release. The link to the developer on the page is Brave Software Inc
If Portapps.io does not have the latest version, you can manually update it by going to -browser/releases, selecting the appropriate Release version, downloading the correct archive (should be something like brave-version-win32-x64.zip) and then copying the version folder from that archive to your portable install.
Well I have decided to finally move up the ladder a rung or two. I bought a Windows 7 ThinkPad notebook. It's used of course and labeled to be in 'mint' condition. Late to the Win 7 party for sure but I was late for the Win XP party also ... didn't start using Win XP till 2012.
I have been having more problems over the last 2 years with web pages not opening or looking right or now being 'refused' entry to a web page being told my browser is 'too old' ... just clicking on a link to read a news story but I can't get there. Changing the user agent can only do so much and usually nothing at all.
I still intend to mostly use my ThinkPad T42 XP notebook since all the software programs I need and use are on that computer. I can still do banking and most everything else also. The newer ThinkPad will be a T520:
Once I get it all set up and secure to my liking I will probably do banking and other critical things on the T520. I don't intend to load it up with many software programs ... as I mentioned earlier, all the programs I currently use are on the Win XP computer. Sometimes I do run into a program that won't run on Win XP so I will put those on the Win 7 ThinkPad.
I just wanted to get some help / advice as to what portable browser or two portable browsers would be the best to use on this computer. I am thinking that using this newer notebook with a better browser will let me use or see web pages that I'm currently having trouble with.
If by "portable" you are only seeking no registry entries on the host computer, no favorites stored on the computer, favorites travel with the thumb drive, as examples, then *ANY* Chrome-based browser can do that.
Ok ... reading the replies ... the last post by TSNH could be one browser. I forgot that now having a Win 7 computer ... or soon to have one, will get it next week ... anyway, I could use Pale Moon again. I now use New Moon and a few others for Win XP but I can get a few better working browsers now for Win 7.
I'm sure there are many more out there somewhere. Just had to throw in the towel with these web pages not working or my Win XP computer just trying to open a page and just getting so 'hot'. Lately, I am having that problem with Amazon. I didn't seem to have any serious problems with Amazon until the last six months. You would think the computer is going to burst into flames or maybe just melt down.
Any Firefox browser, as well as its forks, Waterfox, Palemoon, can easily be made portable. To do this, make a cmd file in the browser folder with the following line: firefox.exe -Profile "username" If there will be another browser, then accordingly: waterfox.exe -Profile "username"
UnGoogled Chromium v117.0.5938.92-1 at Softpedia. Is v117 a newer version? I downloaded Pale Moon v32.4.1 x64 but can't do anything with it till I get the T520 W7 x 64 notebook. So then if I understand correctly ... I put the UnGoogled Chromium v109.0.5414.120-1 into the Palemoon bin folder after I delete everything in the bin folder.
Hi, does anyone have a method for sending a genome browser over email? I have a genbank file of interest and would like to share it with my colleagues who do not use the command line or many bioinformatics tools. Additionally, we do not have a centralized genome browser at work. I think it would be fantastic if I could, for example, package up a JBrowse instance and email it to someone to open in their web browser.
My colleagues do not have IGV on their computers or anything similar. I think I'd like some self-extracting genome browser or something to work in a web browser when opened as an attachment. Another option is to have a hyperlink to some public website like UCSC or Galaxy that allows custom and private sessions.
IGV is a single file download (there is even a web start but that may not work with custom genomes). I suppose you could download IGV and set things up the way you like them, zip the folder back up and send it to them. If they can't handle something as simple as unzipping and running one jar file then I wish you luck!
I love IGV and use it; however it is not immediately clear how I could save a session complete with features and a reference assembly such that my colleagues could open the session from their email. I am also not clear how I'd zip all of IGV and send it over email when my size limit is 20MB and the current package is 750MB.
Can you temporarily host the archive on a web location for them to download? Technically you would be redistributing IGV so that may be against the use license (but I will assume this is a small number of people in a private collaboration). It may also be possible to remove the default human genome components since you don't need those (further reducing the size of the download).
Unfortunately, running this and probably any other JS-based browser locally will trigger cross-site errors, as I have learned from Genoverse this morning. I thought that a JS-based client would be the optimal solution; however, there is a fundamental security obstacle.
I appreciate the idea @Jean, but @genomax2 is right that I would like to send something interactive over email. I can package and prepare something, but it needs to be ready to go when the recipient opens it from email.
Then you can send them a "data directory" with the data that you have prepared for them (e.g. you could run the normal jbrowse processes like prepare-refseqs.pl, flatfile-to-json.pl, etc) or just send them files (fasta, gff, etc) that they can open.
This would be in contrast to running jbrowse instances on the web, where sharing URLs to jbrowse also works well. The desktop mode is offered as an alternative! Feel free to make suggestions on github for jbrowse if interested. The desktop mode was announced in the recent genome biology paper
How about histories, downloads, cookies, caches, etc, etc, will it be all inside the folder where the portable browser is, no mark or any traceable stuffs whatsoever that it will leave behind inside the PC that I used?
But: In normal cases Adobe Flash Player is installed on the main system and Opera will use this plugin when installed. As soon as you visit a Flash-based website, the Flash plugin will save cookies to:
Edit: After reading the comments section, it seems that you are trying to use the portable version of Chrome. This is harder to decet then if you were simply going to try and install it from a USB stick, but there are still ways of detecting this.
It will leave small traces of evidence in Windows registry (but you have to actually know what to look for), even if you just plugin the USB stick and navigate to the folder of the browser on the stick.
Regarldess of whether it's portable Chrome, Firefox, K-Meleon, Opera, Maxthon, or something else.
The problem is that the portable Chrome (from PortableApps) seems to only start when using GoogleChromePortable.exe. If I use the Chrome binary directly, it will start my local installation.With Selenium it seems that no matter what Chrome path I pass to it (GoogleChromePortable.exe or binary path), it starts my local installation.
In packages obtained from PortableApps.com, you have two executables: a GoogleChromePortable.exe in the install (actually, unpack) directory and a chrome.exe in [installdirectory]/App/Chrome-bin, the first being "just" a launcher which provides the portabilized app with a consistent environment.
As I could observe, chromedriver needs to directly interact with the "real" Chrome executable, otherwise the script will launch the browser (via the launcher) but will eventually crash with error message:
I have tried installing UIpath studio extension on my portable Firefox Browser and it installed well but while trying to record the Browser actions I am getting error as"we have detected that you are trying to capture in a browser and your extension is not enabled.
please enable Uipath extension before continuing"
This topic presents the most frequent reasons why the UiPath Extension for Firefox might not work properly, and how to solve these issues. Extension on older Firefox versions Description Mozilla introduced an extension signing verification algorithm...
QtWeb Internet Browser - lightweight, secure and portable browser having unique user interface and privacy features. QtWeb is an open source project based on Nokia's Qt framework and Apple's WebKit rendering engine (the same as being used in Apple Safari and Google Chrome). QtWeb is so compact and self-sufficient (not much dependencies), that it operates perfectly in bootable Windows (WinPE-based) and Linux environments (LiveCD) and has been used in many freeware and shareware projects, like Active@ Boot Disk.
A standalone version can be used for testing a specific setup or version, without touching the system wide settings (profile). It can also be used to create an almost fully portable installation of Vivaldi that you could store on an external disk, for sharing between computers.
The following instructions are for Windows. If you are on Linux or macOS, you can run the Snapshot and Stable versions side by side, without having to take extra steps during installation.
If you have automatic updates enabled in Settings > General > Updates, the update will be downloaded automatically and installed on the next browser restart. Update ready message will also appear on the right side of the Address Bar when an update has been downloaded. Click on it and then on Restart to complete the update.
7fc3f7cf58