Hi,
I left at
http://logd.tw.rpi.edu/lodq an updated version (as an
picture and an example in turtle) of what I *think* we want this
vocabulary should express. There are a few issues that I haven't
resolved and I would really appreciate feedack:
- As we talked with Tim Lebo, we should be able to reuse other
vocabularies. I haven't checked out sdmx, maybe OPM and/or PML or
others. Right now I have our own predicates for almost everything but
that should change.
- Another issue we talked was the fact that it should be a
justification on why a user gives a specific evaluation to a dataset:
It is not clear to me how to include this in a way that can hold both
for objective and subjective (maybe the PML people can give a solution
to this). In the meantime I have a dcterms:description hanging from a
blank node lodq:Justification.
Please provide feedback in order to improve these points (or others
you have in mind).
Best regards,
Alvaro Graves