an REALLY important question
Rick M.
I like to know how to tell if a carrot is sweet or bitter from just
looking at it.
I like my vegies but i only like sweet carrots.
And don't say the small ones are sweet cause that not always true and
some big ones are sweet also!
Thanks Regards,
Rick M.
mister c of nine
wrote:
you have to nibble the tip. just go into the supermarket, have a
nibble, and when you find the right taste, buy it!
it works for me...
--
alt.CMMCollective: #0042 of 0069
"Mooching is Irrelevent."
---
"Blessed be the Followers of the
Coke Truck." - Old CMM Saying.
---
Brought to you by CGP Online
and the CMM Collective
http://www.omen.net.au/~cgp
<message ends>
Ben R. Song
that is so unhygenic isnt there a law against people like you?
--
- Ben Song
Fusion Technologies
http://FusionHardware.com
http://FusionAudio.com
mister c of nine <c...@omen.net.au> wrote in message
news:381975fa...@news.omen.net.au...
Jonathon Bates
Batesy
"Ben R. Song" wrote:
--
"You! Out Of The Gene Pool!"
"The only people who are crazy enough to think they can change the
world--are the people who do."
mister c of nine
<bat...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>Ben i believe this is a joke.
actually, it wasn't. and what do i care? if no one else has the
thought to perceive my nibbling on their carrots, then, well, that's
their own stupid fault.
besides, serves them right for not tasting their own carrots.
mister c of nine
<b...@fusionaudio.com> wrote:
>gross. do you know OTHER people have to eat them!
>that is so unhygenic isnt there a law against people like you?
yes, but i think it applies more to my taste in schoolgirls than my
taste in carrots...
Paul Raj Khangure
: you have to nibble the tip. just go into the supermarket, have a
: nibble, and when you find the right taste, buy it!
It appears I only had you killfiled in rasfwrj.
My bad.
Now corrected.
*plonk*
Paul Raj Khangure
--
I stayed up all last night playing poker with tarot cards.
I got a full house and four people died.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
mister c of nine
<p...@sweet-thang.digitaljunkie.net> wrote:
>It appears I only had you killfiled in rasfwrj.
>
>My bad.
>
>Now corrected.
>
>*plonk*
>
>
>Paul Raj Khangure
you giggle me up.
10-71.
snafu
is alleged to have written:
>On Fri, 29 Oct 1999 19:30:54 +0800, "Ben R. Song"
><b...@fusionaudio.com> wrote:
>
>>gross. do you know OTHER people have to eat them!
>>that is so unhygenic isnt there a law against people like you?
>
>yes, but i think it applies more to my taste in schoolgirls than my
>taste in carrots...
As you demonstrate so perfectly, there are indeed some males who have
a taste for women older than themselves.
snafu
mister c of nine
>As you demonstrate so perfectly, there are indeed some males who have
>a taste for women older than themselves.
*shrug*
we all need one vice.
when choosing my vice, i sat down and said: what should it be? should
it be biting others my own age? should it be delivering letterbombs,
or trolling newsgroups, or cross-posting to everything i could think
of, or should it be excessive abbreviations?
no, i thought.
older chix.
yep.
that, and nibbling carrots after midnight.
mister c of nine
<p...@sweet-thang.digitaljunkie.net> wrote:
>It appears I only had you killfiled in rasfwrj.
>
>My bad.
>
>Now corrected.
>
>*plonk*
paul go "baaaa".
*yawn*
it's early.
i like ya, paul. i know ya can't read this. i like to think that if
those guys in your group all decided to march lemming-like off a
bridge, you'd follow eagerly. interesting thought, that.
of course, we all need hobbies.
mister c of nine
<ko...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>mister c of nine <c...@omen.net.au> wrote in message
>news:3819a0c7...@news.omen.net.au...
>>
>> besides, serves them right for not tasting their own carrots.
>
>What makes you think they haven't already slobbered over the ones you've
>bitten into?
>You carrot-sucker.
i'm not stupid. i bring my spit-o-meter.
St. Chucky the Chunderous
wrote:
>On Fri, 29 Oct 1999 15:12:06 GMT, sna...@rocketmail.com (snafu) wrote:
>
>>As you demonstrate so perfectly, there are indeed some males who have
>>a taste for women older than themselves.
>
>*shrug*
>
>we all need one vice.
>
>when choosing my vice, i sat down and said: what should it be? should
>it be biting others my own age? should it be delivering letterbombs,
>or trolling newsgroups, or cross-posting to everything i could think
>of, or should it be excessive abbreviations?
>
>no, i thought.
>
>older chix.
>
>yep.
>
>that, and nibbling carrots after midnight.
I'd also like to say Hello Snafu, welcome to our Newsgroup.
St. Chuck
--
"This is Usenet. Expecting kindness here is futile."
(the Jaded Ones); "Lungfish are Irrelevent." (13 of 12)
To read my whole signature (and from there, my homepage),
go here - http://www.omen.net.au/~hatboy/signature.htm
St. Chucky the Chunderous
<p...@sweet-thang.digitaljunkie.net> wrote:
>In iinet.general mister c of nine <c...@omen.net.au> wrote:
>
>: you have to nibble the tip. just go into the supermarket, have a
>: nibble, and when you find the right taste, buy it!
>
>It appears I only had you killfiled in rasfwrj.
>
>My bad.
>
>Now corrected.
>
>*plonk*
>
>
>Paul Raj Khangure
Hee hee hee hee! Giggle!
Welcome aboard Paul!
Mister C and I and Rick are pretty much the only people who post here
- who, exactly, are you talking to? Or is this personal?
mister c of nine
Chunderous) wrote:
>Hee hee hee hee! Giggle!
>
>Welcome aboard Paul!
>
>Mister C and I and Rick are pretty much the only people who post here
>- who, exactly, are you talking to? Or is this personal?
*putting on a mild voice*
wasn't it paul's mates responsible for invading our group last time,
then having the audacity to killfile US when we quit their
cross-posting threads and instead went to their group?
do you ever get the feeling of deja vu?
Jason Cornelius
news:3819a0c7...@news.omen.net.au...
>
> besides, serves them right for not tasting their own carrots.
What makes you think they haven't already slobbered over the ones you've
bitten into?
You carrot-sucker.
Jason.
Zac Charlesworth
Oct 1999 18:56:17 GMT a mysterious being known only as c...@omen.net.au
(mister c of nine) escaped the abyss to utter the following foreboding
words:
<snip>
Aha! I just noticed the extra groups in the headers and now realise
where these extremly alternative being came from.
How odd. Are you both on medication ?
Zac
Rick M.
says...
> gross. do you know OTHER people have to eat them!
> that is so unhygenic isnt there a law against people like you?
>
> > you have to nibble the tip. just go into the supermarket, have a
> > nibble, and when you find the right taste, buy it!
>
>
>
considered it, it DOES have it's merits.
i.e. if I see a nibbled off carrot I can presume that they are bitter not
sweet. And thgat saves me risking a taste test of my own.
That is unless after passing the taste test, the tester found he had no
money or her eftpos was refused at the checkout or perhaps they had a
terrible panic attack and had to leave the building or maybe they got
arrested by the police for sampling or God made a big hole open up from
hell and swallowed them up for being so evil and tasting carrots before
they bought them! or hmm I can hear a carrot calling from my fridge...
bbl
Paul Raj Khangure
: Welcome aboard Paul!
No thanks, I'll bail.
: Mister C and I and Rick are pretty much the only people who post here
: - who, exactly, are you talking to? Or is this personal?
All three of you.
Especially Rick, who crossposted into local.wantree and iinet.general
Burn in hell, gentlemen.
Rick M.
> Especially Rick, who crossposted into local.wantree and iinet.general
And don't forget the wonderfully named :
alt.walter-cronkite.go-gadget-go.carrot-breath newsgroup!
mister c of nine
<p...@sweet-thang.digitaljunkie.net> wrote:
>Burn in hell, gentlemen.
hey, chuck... look at this guy! he thinks we care!
Jason Cornelius
> On 30 Oct 1999 06:03:06 GMT, Paul Raj Khangure
> <p...@sweet-thang.digitaljunkie.net> wrote:
>
>
> >Burn in hell, gentlemen.
>
> hey, chuck... look at this guy! he thinks we care!
You should.
Posting in this group will find you out of your league.
We can *make* you burn in hell.
Jason.
mister c of nine
<ko...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>You should.
>Posting in this group will find you out of your league.
>We can *make* you burn in hell.
bwahahahahahaha! ANOTHER ONE!!!!
MORE MORE MORE!!!!
(chuck, what do these guys do for an encore?)
Zac Charlesworth
Oct 1999 15:27:52 GMT a mysterious being known only as c...@omen.net.au
(mister c of nine) escaped the abyss to utter the following foreboding
words:
>bwahahahahahaha! ANOTHER ONE!!!!
>MORE MORE MORE!!!!
You guys don't go to West Busselton Primary do you? I'm damn sure I've
seen you in one fo their special Ed classes.
>(chuck, what do these guys do for an encore?)
Hyuk, hyuk. Hey Chuck, aren't I so cool. Heheh, look at me dribble all
these funny words, hey Chuck. Heheh, we're so funny, aren't we Chuck.
Zac
Zac's COmputer Service
Busselton, WA
Return Email Address works fine as is, try it
mister c of nine
<NOS...@zcs.net.au> wrote:
>You guys don't go to West Busselton Primary do you? I'm damn sure I've
>seen you in one fo their special Ed classes.
[1] Cast doubts on education.
[2] Attempt to joke about age.
>Hyuk, hyuk. Hey Chuck, aren't I so cool. Heheh, look at me dribble all
>these funny words, hey Chuck. Heheh, we're so funny, aren't we Chuck.
[3] Attempt imitation.
not bad for a first attempt. please try again. we're trying to see
some skill.
mister c of nine
<mre...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>I have remained silent until now, but it has been bothering me your names.
nice sentence. please try again. if you are meaning to question names
chosen for internet use, please attempt to choose one yourself, erryn
binning.
>Starting with mister c of nine. Now while I do not have a problem with this
>name at all, I am ponderous as to its origins. And I find it interesting it
>is also typed it all in lower case - while this is not a problem in itself
>as poor grammar has existed on the Internet for some time, I ask merely for
>information, if there is some particular relevance (or irrelevance) to it
>being typed this way.
*giggle*
oh, do we wish to bring the grammar argument, do we, erryn? well, when
one is wishing to point out grammatical problems in another's post,
one must make certain that their own post is correct.
however, seeing as you hinted to asking a question, but did not
actually ask one, i will attempt to answer the question you could not
ask.
first, the use of no capitalisation (as paul knows), is a common trend
in creative literature. during my years studying english at
university, i found a love of this style of expression, which lent
itself to a lovely appearance, as well as an honest and
straight-forward approach to writing which i found terribly
attractive.
all my work is, therefore, in this style i have found so much
enjoyment from reading. and in my writing, i might add.
it was a post modernist trend to use no capitalisation, as a reaction,
for some, against structured norms. being one who enjoys such
discussions on the forms, structures, and trends in literature, i also
felt this expressed my keen interest in the english language as it
translates into the written form.
my choice to use no capitalisation is, therefore, not an error, and
most definately not a mistake, but is, rather, a choice of style and
an expression of personality. that it is mistaken for being an
expression of kindergarten rules of punctuation, is more a reflection
upon those who claim it to be in error, when it is a blatant example
of the writer's opinions and interests in regard to modern literature.
i find that most people who complain about this trend, tend to be
involved in computer, or science studies, and seem to be certain that
they understand the english language in more detail than someone who
has so obviously studied it for many years. they also believe that
just because capitalisation is used in physics books, that
capitalisation is the norm for all genres and all writers of fiction.
how they leaped to this gret conclusion is well beyond my
understanding, but they hardly ever seem willing to listen, and are
instead more intent upon pointing out that my opinions as to the
validity of their argument involving the relative similarities between
two pieces of text, are completely irrelevent because i failed to use
capitalisation, and this, therefore, renders my argument invalid. if,
they argue, i would be willing to use capitalisation, like stephen
king does (and we all know how he's just the epitome of the modern
literary genius), then maybe my opinion would be more intelligent, and
would then be considered as a basis for not killfiling me due to my
lack of capitalisation.
they also like to point out that my asking them to use an apostrophe
where relevent, is just being picky.
>Perhaps, say, you shift key is broken - in which case
>I would suggest you use your caps lock diligently, but not overly - or it
>may even be some sort of status evoking method to buy you credit with
>hackers (l33t d00d syndrome), however I doubt this as there are not enough
>letters replaced with symbols and numbers, and the nine is spelt out rather
>than a plain 9.
>
>And the nine itself is an enigma.
what's so hard to understand about a nine?
>Would an eight or a seven not be as
>magnificent as a nine, or it could even be a six without changing itself so
>significantly. In fact, I would go so far as to say, don't you feel guilty
>that you have left these other just as worthy numbers lacking in a position
>of use. These perfectly elegant numbers may be relegated to your actual
>posts themself, rather than having pride and precedence in the from line of
>your message. The same goes for the entire alphabet, perhaps c stands for
>carrot or cabbage or even coriander, but this would be leaving out the other
>25 letters of the alphabet, all of almost similar importance. Why not the
>fantastic letters s (for squash and Spanish-pickling onion), maybe a (for
>apples, asparagus and asymetrical-tomato) and that would be a travesty to
>the letters g (for gerkhin and grubby-potato), j (for jalapeno and
>juicy-orange) and p (for paw-paw and pushy-old-lady-at-counter).
instead of babbling about your problems, perhaps asking a question
might help educate you. i hear that questioning those things you do
not understand is one way of finding answers. sitting there talking to
a wall is seldom very eucational. although i do know some who would
benefit from such experiences. others tend to make it an occupation,
isn't that right, paul?
>But these are only trivial matters. What really irks me is the mister.
i could hardly call myself missus.
>For a
>start, why take up so much more room than you need, a simple "Mr" will
>suffice and it is even pronounced the same.
actually, you mean "mr." and not "mr" at all. as i said, when
attempting to be witty through the comments on another person's use of
words, always be certain that you are actually correct.
>This is inconsequential to the
>obvious sexism displayed though.
ah, sexism. what a pile of walloped cods.
>In this day and age you should well know
>much better than do flaunt such gender division.
oh, good. here we go. now we're getting to the meat and veg.
>Ignoring the obvious other
>flaws in your name, you may well do with the courtesy to have something such
>as "The Honourable C of Nine"
i'm not honourable.
>or "The Androgynous C of Nine"
i'm hardly 'androgynous'.
>maybe even
>perhaps "The Effeminate C of Nine"
i left that one to erikson. he was enjoying it immensely. and you
forgot a full-stop.
>One thing is for sure however, you cannot
>continue with your blatant tongue-in-cheek attitude towards our equal
>society. Even if it means a simple "C of Nine"
of course i am. you fail to recognise that i am, in fact, a highly
unsophisticated racist-sexist pigdog.
>And before I forget, your spelling out of 'nine' instead of the use of the
>numeral (9) is not only a waste of screen real estate, but a waste of hard
>disk space. In fact, you should really be using a "1" or a "0" to get
>maximum benefit out of every electron whether it be on a hard disk, in a
>wire or space on a screen. "1" is of course the most ideal as it takes up
>little screen real estate, but "0" also has its merits as it takes up less
>hard disk space (and is faster through the twists and turns of the exchange
>too).
perhaps it is meant as a name, and not a number. had i meant 'mister c
the ninth', probably would have used a numeral. unfortunately, i meant
'of nine', which could mean a place, a title, a fetish, or a state of
joined consciousness.
>Now I have left some less consequential quibbles out, as I am being generous
>enough to give you some time to examine the error of your ways and
>potentially make amends, but I will bring these other faults to your notice
>have you decided otherwise. So I will move onto your friends names...
one word: apostrophes.
when attempting to point out 'errors' in other people's posts. always
be certain you have none in your own. how many times must i put up
with people yawning me up about grammar, punctuation, and theories
they obviously do not comprehend.
>First of all, Rick M. Obviously a name his mother gave him. 'nuff said...
how obviously? what kind of a name is "m"? sounds like something out
of james bond. and if you're telling me your name given to you by your
mum is "binning" then i can see why you're so sensitive about names.
you place a great deal of importance on them. have people been using
your surname as a verb?
>St. Chucky the Chunderous presents a more interesting specimen with its own
>unique problems. While I applaud his use of capitals in all major words, I
>think it would be courteous that a saint (I assume the St. is for Saint,
>however it could be for station, stuck, stupid etc) he should provide
>details of his sainthood in his signature.
details of his sainthood used to be available at the Church of Modern
Misconceptions site. unfortunately, it has been recalled, due to
clerical errors.
>One must know exactly what sort
>of Saint we are dealing here.
believe me, you aren't interested enough. if you were, you'd ask.
>Obviously if this saint merely slays dragons
>or drives a beaten up volvo, then we want nothing to do with him. It is just
>this sort of pusillanimous behaviour
there's a big word for someone who can't use an apostrophe.
>(such as slaying dragons) that brought
>the British empire to where it is. It's abbreviation, while admirable for
>saving not only hard disk space but also bandwidth, is quite unacceptable in
>the instance of a Saint. If he is a Saint of note or status, then we should
>be full aware that he is a Saint - not only to avoid confusion (as mentioned
>earlier) but also to alert us of a person of importance, in fact, if news
>readers had an equivalent of the <BLINK> tag, then it would be appropriate
>to use it in such circumstances, so no bones are made about it. It is
>obvious he is quite cavalier about it, which is a quite simply, an
>unacceptable attitude.
your obsession with chucky's sainthood is admirable. unfortunately,
you can not be given one yourself, as the Church of Modern
Misconceptions does not give out sainthoods to people with names like
"binnings". people would then think sainthoods were for trashy
individuals.
>
>This is only matched in magnitude by the use of 'Chucky' Either you are
>Charles, or you are not - do not try and confuse me, I will only find you
>out.
spooky. i'm impressed.
no really.
i am.
a threat.
ooooh.
>Even Charlie would not have been as bad, but Chucky is quite the
>epitome of not only lower class gravel eating yokels but the slack-arsedness
>this entire generation has come to represent.
could it be it is finally beginning to understand?
>It is also entirely in
>conflict with sainthood.
darn. it tripped itself up.
>If the Pope knew about a Saint calling himself
>merely "Chucky" he would have them summoned (possibly from the dead)
>immediately, so he could put his big white Doc Martens into their ass.
tsk tsk.
>It
>has become quite apparent that you are of the less class of Saint, of which
>it would be highly inappropriate to not just socialise, but mix with.
obvious to whom? and "less class"? what is that? i know that to have
less class...
>Perhaps there is still a chance for you to repent your evil sins and you may
>still be able to build a proper, orderly Saintly image, but if you are too
>slow you could well lose it all.
hmm. what is it with these people who can't use apostrophes, but like
to pick on people who can? and why do people who complain about other
people's names, simply because they don't use boring ones, like
"erryn", all have to assume we want to be like them? do they think
they are attractive enough to listen to? do they possess some grand
knowledge we're not privvy to? have they some magic device which makes
them superior with just a push of a button and a hopeful smile? i did
not just appear here and say: "erryn, you ugly slut, you can't spell."
i probably should have, though. i usually like getting the first punch
in.
but, please, show me more of this wonderful thing you call thought.
it would also be nice if you asked us a question, instead of just
wondered aloud. if you're just going to do that, please bandy up and
keep your whiny mouth shut. i have enough problems listening to my
girlfriend's sissy bitching.
>Now I hope you find my sincere advice most useful good gentlemen. Thankyou
>for your time and courtesy.
oh, hang on. all i have to say about the above passage, is this:
This is inconsequential to the obvious sexism displayed though.
and:
In this day and age you should well know much better than do flaunt
such gender division.
go on. can we play some more?
mister c of nine
wrote:
eucational: getting an education, without getting all 'd's.
mister c of nine
one self reference, which looks like: i
one frog, which responds to the name: gronkywormburgles of twelve.
Erryn Binning
<snip>
I have remained silent until now, but it has been bothering me your names.
Starting with mister c of nine. Now while I do not have a problem with this
name at all, I am ponderous as to its origins. And I find it interesting it
is also typed it all in lower case - while this is not a problem in itself
as poor grammar has existed on the Internet for some time, I ask merely for
information, if there is some particular relevance (or irrelevance) to it
being typed this way. Perhaps, say, you shift key is broken - in which case
I would suggest you use your caps lock diligently, but not overly - or it
may even be some sort of status evoking method to buy you credit with
hackers (l33t d00d syndrome), however I doubt this as there are not enough
letters replaced with symbols and numbers, and the nine is spelt out rather
than a plain 9.
And the nine itself is an enigma. Would an eight or a seven not be as
magnificent as a nine, or it could even be a six without changing itself so
significantly. In fact, I would go so far as to say, don't you feel guilty
that you have left these other just as worthy numbers lacking in a position
of use. These perfectly elegant numbers may be relegated to your actual
posts themself, rather than having pride and precedence in the from line of
your message. The same goes for the entire alphabet, perhaps c stands for
carrot or cabbage or even coriander, but this would be leaving out the other
25 letters of the alphabet, all of almost similar importance. Why not the
fantastic letters s (for squash and Spanish-pickling onion), maybe a (for
apples, asparagus and asymetrical-tomato) and that would be a travesty to
the letters g (for gerkhin and grubby-potato), j (for jalapeno and
juicy-orange) and p (for paw-paw and pushy-old-lady-at-counter).
But these are only trivial matters. What really irks me is the mister. For a
start, why take up so much more room than you need, a simple "Mr" will
suffice and it is even pronounced the same. This is inconsequential to the
obvious sexism displayed though. In this day and age you should well know
much better than do flaunt such gender division. Ignoring the obvious other
flaws in your name, you may well do with the courtesy to have something such
as "The Honourable C of Nine" or "The Androgynous C of Nine" maybe even
perhaps "The Effeminate C of Nine" One thing is for sure however, you cannot
continue with your blatant tongue-in-cheek attitude towards our equal
society. Even if it means a simple "C of Nine"
And before I forget, your spelling out of 'nine' instead of the use of the
numeral (9) is not only a waste of screen real estate, but a waste of hard
disk space. In fact, you should really be using a "1" or a "0" to get
maximum benefit out of every electron whether it be on a hard disk, in a
wire or space on a screen. "1" is of course the most ideal as it takes up
little screen real estate, but "0" also has its merits as it takes up less
hard disk space (and is faster through the twists and turns of the exchange
too).
Now I have left some less consequential quibbles out, as I am being generous
enough to give you some time to examine the error of your ways and
potentially make amends, but I will bring these other faults to your notice
have you decided otherwise. So I will move onto your friends names...
First of all, Rick M. Obviously a name his mother gave him. 'nuff said...
St. Chucky the Chunderous presents a more interesting specimen with its own
unique problems. While I applaud his use of capitals in all major words, I
think it would be courteous that a saint (I assume the St. is for Saint,
however it could be for station, stuck, stupid etc) he should provide
details of his sainthood in his signature. One must know exactly what sort
of Saint we are dealing here. Obviously if this saint merely slays dragons
or drives a beaten up volvo, then we want nothing to do with him. It is just
this sort of pusillanimous behaviour (such as slaying dragons) that brought
the British empire to where it is. It's abbreviation, while admirable for
saving not only hard disk space but also bandwidth, is quite unacceptable in
the instance of a Saint. If he is a Saint of note or status, then we should
be full aware that he is a Saint - not only to avoid confusion (as mentioned
earlier) but also to alert us of a person of importance, in fact, if news
readers had an equivalent of the <BLINK> tag, then it would be appropriate
to use it in such circumstances, so no bones are made about it. It is
obvious he is quite cavalier about it, which is a quite simply, an
unacceptable attitude.
This is only matched in magnitude by the use of 'Chucky' Either you are
Charles, or you are not - do not try and confuse me, I will only find you
out. Even Charlie would not have been as bad, but Chucky is quite the
epitome of not only lower class gravel eating yokels but the slack-arsedness
this entire generation has come to represent. It is also entirely in
conflict with sainthood. If the Pope knew about a Saint calling himself
merely "Chucky" he would have them summoned (possibly from the dead)
immediately, so he could put his big white Doc Martens into their ass. It
has become quite apparent that you are of the less class of Saint, of which
it would be highly inappropriate to not just socialise, but mix with.
Perhaps there is still a chance for you to repent your evil sins and you may
still be able to build a proper, orderly Saintly image, but if you are too
slow you could well lose it all.
Now I hope you find my sincere advice most useful good gentlemen. Thankyou
for your time and courtesy.
Regards
Erryn
Zac Charlesworth
(mister c of nine) escaped the abyss to utter the following foreboding
words:
>[1] Cast doubts on education.
>[2] Attempt to joke about age.
>[3] Attempt imitation.
>not bad for a first attempt. please try again. we're trying to see
>some skill.
I'm impressed - an intelligable post. Keep it up!
Ian Peters
Ian
mister c of nine <c...@omen.net.au> wrote in message
news:381b3f32...@news.omen.net.au...
eenie...@iinet.net.au
>i.e. if I see a nibbled off carrot I can presume that they are bitter not
>sweet. And thgat saves me risking a taste test of my own.
>That is unless after passing the taste test, the tester found he had no
>money or her eftpos was refused at the checkout or perhaps they had a
>terrible panic attack and had to leave the building or maybe they got
>arrested by the police for sampling or God made a big hole open up from
>hell and swallowed them up for being so evil and tasting carrots before
>they bought them! or hmm I can hear a carrot calling from my fridge...
The random carrot nibbler strikes again!
Erryn Binning
<snip>
My mistakes, carry on...
Regards
Erryn
Jason Cornelius
>
> not bad for a first attempt. please try again. we're trying to see
> some skill.
DEAN!!! OH HOW I'VE MISSED YOU!
Jason.
Rick M.
on but when i clicked on floowo up in my current newsreader of choice
microplanet gravity I doesnt bring up the whole post it cuts it short for
some stoopid reason! tah's all i got to say, except whats a gret?
snafu
alleged to have written:
An apostrophe eliminator?
snafu
Jason Cornelius
news:381C60...@mushka.cx...
>
> I didn't know I'm using that waste of space aka Omen.
I'd be very careful how you libel people, Deen.
Jason.
St. Chucky the Chunderous
>there was a reference to meat and veg in here that i was going to comment
>on but when i clicked on floowo up in my current newsreader of choice
>microplanet gravity I doesnt bring up the whole post it cuts it short for
>some stoopid reason! tah's all i got to say, except whats a gret?
GRET: The noise a frog makes when it eats a pretzel and doesn't have a
glass of water to wash it down.
TAH: What a frog says when you give it a glass of water.
St. Chuck (the answer to the question: "Who do you call when you want
your stupid questions answered and your typos ridiculed?")
St. Chucky the Chunderous
>On Sun, 31 Oct 1999 16:06:52 +0800, Rick M. <b...@wantree.com.au> is
>alleged to have written:
>
>>there was a reference to meat and veg in here that i was going to comment
>>on but when i clicked on floowo up in my current newsreader of choice
>>microplanet gravity I doesnt bring up the whole post it cuts it short for
>>some stoopid reason! tah's all i got to say, except whats a gret?
>
>An apostrophe eliminator?
>
>snafu
*yawn*
Have you had yer grets lately?
The wrong answer: No I havent (sic)
St. 'C'h'u'c'k'
mister c of nine
>The random carrot nibbler strikes again!
it's gotta be better than nibblin broccoli.
mister c of nine
wrote:
>I didn't know I'm using that waste of space aka Omen. The drongo loiters
>there, hence I will not be touching them with a ten foot barge pole.
i was with wantree for two years, and i hated it. hated it immensely.
i had nothing but cut-outs, drop-offs and kickings at the two-hour
mark. i was abused by staff at wantree for questioning their ability
to answer their support emails, and was told not to waste their time
asking why things weren't working. andrew milner, in particular, was
an arrogant annoying little facist who refused to answer posts asking
why he felt the need to be abusive when asked why wantree crashed
regularly on weekends.
sick and tired with this lack of people skills by wantree (especially
after the loss of their only real staff member, kevin, which left us
all feeling very let down, but thanks, kevin, for the surreal
newsgroup, which i still inflict damage upon...), i decided enough was
enough, and left to find a better isp.
having used many before wantree, i felt omen would be a go.
iinet charged a silly set-up fee, and i was unwilling to pay for that.
omen, on the other hand, was all helpful at the front desk, and even
though i asked a dozen more questions that i should, the lovely lady
at the desk was extremely patient, and helpful, even when my password
was too silly and she had to type it in a dozen times. this was the
only problem i have ever had at omen, and i've been with them no for
about a year.
in that time, i have had nothing but swift answers to support
questions, and when i've had to phone, they even called me back to
make sure that the problem i was having, had been fixed.
and i don't even know anyone there personally! i mean, to get that
kind of attention with most isps, you have to know the support guys by
first name basis, and have to buy them beers on the weekend.
so, when i read someone's slimy refuse against the only isp i have
been with that i can only defend, instead of attack (which was one of
my favourite pasttimes), i can only giggle. because it's people like
you who will knock something you probably haven't tried, which leaves
me, sitting here with my evenings online without disconnection.
no odd ghosts haunting my very old phone line.
so, to sum: i do flinky flinky dance in your general direction.
mister c of nine
<ipe...@student.ecel.uwa.edu.au> wrote:
>What a stimulating piece of self indulgence.
i wouldn't go that far. it stimulated me, but i didn't think it would
do the same for you. still, glad to have made your night...
mister c of nine
<mre...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>mister c of nine <c...@omen.net.au> wrote in message
>news:381b3f32...@news.omen.net.au...
><snip>
>My mistakes, carry on...
i will. thanks.
Zac Charlesworth
Rev Possum ?
Zac
Zac's Computer Service
Poss
day, He traded it in for something more powerful, and then on the 9th
day Zac Charlesworth <NOS...@zcs.net.au>:
said
>(In reply to Mister C's post)
>
>Rev Possum ?
>
Yes, dear? You called?
Rev. Possum Bits (aka Pseudocherus peregrinus occidantalis), U.L.C.
Peering into her letterbox at pam...@wantree.com.au
Tottering through her home page at http://www.wantree.com.au/~pamela
Picard: So you're saying he'd have more suck...
Riker: .. than William Shatner's acting? Yes Sir!
ST:TNG "The Search for the Lost Episode"
mister c of nine
<NOS...@zcs.net.au> wrote:
>(In reply to Mister C's post)
>
>Rev Possum ?
do i sound like her?
mister c of nine
wrote:
>You all of all the idiots would know, hey?
say that again...?
mister c of nine
wrote:
>What do you define as silly? When I joined, it was $25. Now I personally
>would call anything about that silly. $25 is quite modest, imo.
modest? compared to $0.00? i giggle in your general direction.
>After going to an ethernet connection, I'll never be using a modem
>connection ever again. I'd even rather pay a couple $k to install a
>wavelan connection. Well worth it. Modems are a thing of the past for me
>- I'm beyond them.
beyond them. you giggle me up.
Rick M.
>
has anyone tried or know someone who's tried that (supposedly) non profit
isp apana ? Im thinking of giving them a go....
http://odyssey.apana.org.au/
Jason Cornelius
news:MPG.12882d2b9...@news.wantree.com.au...
>
>
> has anyone tried or know someone who's tried that (supposedly) non profit
> isp apana ? Im thinking of giving them a go....
*CHOKE CHOKE CHOKE*
Sorry.... Just something in my throat. Carry on..
Jason.
St. Chucky the Chunderous
wrote:
>After going to an ethernet connection, I'll never be using a modem
>connection ever again. I'd even rather pay a couple $k to install a
>wavelan connection. Well worth it. Modems are a thing of the past for me
>- I'm beyond them.
>
>Regards,
>
>d.
You gotta admit, that's pretty fucking impressive. Anyway, back to the
show. Hear the joke about the Tasmanian who goes to the doctor to get
his daughter some birth-control pills?
The doctor said, is she sexually active?
"No," replied the man. "She just lies there like a starfish."
St. Chuck
mister c of nine
wrote:
>mister c of nine wrote:
>
>> say that again...?
>
>You obviously weren't following the thread at the time? ;-)
no, i wasn't following the structure of that sentence. in the words of
a very legendary lungfish, they were all "fucked up..."
mister c of nine
wrote:
>So you call *.* < $0.01 modest?
>
>I laugh loudly in your direction!
pfft.
>> beyond them. you giggle me up.
>
>It's nice having speeds well above 56 of 33k6! :-)
it might be, if you were off modems. however, your first post said:
omen's modems suck, i'm not there. then goes on to say "After going to
an ethernet connection, I'll never be using a modem connection ever
again."
now, i'm confused.
either you're currently using a modem, or not.
if you're not, what's the problem, and of course you'd be doing better
than omen's MODEMs... if you are still on modem, then do the flinky
dance again, because now we're pretty much equal here. in all my
zipping back and forth from isp to isp, the FASTEST connection i had
was with a small isp just around the corner from where i live. but
their service sucked, and line droputs were too common.
your whiny bitchin about omen seemed outdated, if, by your words you
were with them so long ago as to make your knowledge of their current
state obsolete.
so: *yawn*
Paul Raj Khangure
: has anyone tried or know someone who's tried that (supposedly) non profit
: isp apana ? Im thinking of giving them a go....
: http://odyssey.apana.org.au/
*shrug*
I've run across one or two of the volunteers for APANA before, and
haven't been at all impressed with them, in character, logical ability,
or technical ability.
Based on that, I wouldn't try, nor recommend others try, APANA.
However, YMMV.
Paul Raj Khangure
--
I stayed up all last night playing poker with tarot cards.
I got a full house and four people died.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
Mark Dignam
: Spaghetti Head wrote:
:> DEAN!!! OH HOW I'VE MISSED YOU!
: I didn't know I'm using that waste of space aka Omen. The drongo loiters
: there, hence I will not be touching them with a ten foot barge pole.
I'm sorry? Waste of Space?
mark
Mark Dignam
: On Sun, 31 Oct 1999 23:29:21 +0800, Dean Hollister <de...@mushka.cx>
: wrote:
: questions, and when i've had to phone, they even called me back to
: make sure that the problem i was having, had been fixed.
: and i don't even know anyone there personally! i mean, to get that
: kind of attention with most isps, you have to know the support guys by
: first name basis, and have to buy them beers on the weekend.
<flutters eyes> Why thank you kind sir.
We try hard.
Mark Dignam
:> having used many before wantree, i felt omen would be a go.
: I used to use Omen when it was the BBS (how long ago was that!). Didn't
: think much of them then, still don't. Seemed to go downhill fast when
: the Internet part of it started up. I could name others that have
: followed a similar path downhill.
Dean,
I'm confused. If we went so far downhill, how come we are a) still here and b)
still growing today.
I'd like you to name another BBS in Perth that successfully made it to the
Internet, to the extent we have. Ok, tell you want, lets make it even
easier. Name me another ex BBS in perth that has their own 155meg Sitelite
Optic Fibre into their building.
So given that data, the only conclusion I can come up with is that either a)
you are very mis-informed, b) you are an idiot, or even c) all of the above.
: After going to an ethernet connection, I'll never be using a modem
: connection ever again. I'd even rather pay a couple $k to install a
: wavelan connection. Well worth it. Modems are a thing of the past for me
: - I'm beyond them.
Not everyone has access to that, or is willing the upfront fee for the gear,
or the volume charging for the data. And so they have to put up with a modem
connection.
mark.
Paul Raj Khangure
: In local.wantree Dean Hollister <de...@mushka.cx> wrote:
<snip the normal bullshit Dean usually posts and Digger's response>
Psst.
Digger.
Most of us have him killfiled.
Do you have to respond to his articles?
Jason Cornelius
> PR..K Lardarse wrote:
>
> > I've run across one or two of the volunteers for APANA before, and
> > haven't been at all impressed with them, in character, logical ability,
> > or technical ability.
>
> to lose. Evidently.
And there's exhibit A.
Jason, still astounded at Deen's ability to crosspost his stupidity for
thousands to see, thus proving everyones point.
Mark Fletcher
Fletch
Mark Dignam <dig...@wombat.omen.net.au> wrote in message
news:7vlmnh$sq3$1...@newsreader.omen.com.au...
> In local.wantree Dean Hollister <de...@mushka.cx> wrote:
Jason Cornelius
>
> Have to learn to stop fibbing Spaghetti Head. You'll get yourself into
> serious strife once again. You're being watched, put it mildly.
Excellent.. My very own Cyber Stalker. To put it delicately, go fuck your
dog up the ass.
Your penchant for melodrama is a constant source of gigglesome moments for
me.
But alas, it serves only to piss everyone else off - therefore you can go
back to were you belong.
Stuck with your dick inserted into any orifice that's willing to give you
the time of day, with a gag firmly wrapped around your pouty little mouth.
So with a healthy *suck suck kiss ass* I bid you and your mother superior
*plonk*
Jason.
mister c of nine
<p...@sweet-thang.digitaljunkie.net> wrote:
>Most of us have him killfiled.
>
>Do you have to respond to his articles?
some people are above such childish ideals as killfiling. i notice
that, even though you choose to ignore his presence, you obviously
don't follow the theory behind your killfile ideal, and ignore him
completely. now you can yell at him from behind someone else's back.
how convenient for you.
i've also found that people who sit and cry about how, as a majority,
they've killfiled so many people, and why hasn't everyone else
followed suit, that the guy crying is actually a minority.
still, whatever helps you get on the good side of americans...
mister c of nine
wrote:
>Not everyone has access to that, or is willing the upfront fee for the gear,
>or the volume charging for the data. And so they have to put up with a modem
>connection.
and of those who do use modems, i'd hazard a guess that one thing
which influences them, is service providing. that is, providing a
service. understanding the concept of 'service' is not in the domain
of most isps, especially those right here in west oz.
sorry to those who take offence, but of all the isps i've tried (the
only i haven't of the biggies, is iinet, the only one which has
offered a virtually bug-free existence, combined with quick and easy
responses to email, is omen.
mister c of nine
<gu...@swami.pcguru.com.au> wrote:
>You're a try-hard?
better that than a not-try-at-all.
mister c of nine
<ko...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>Excellent.. My very own Cyber Stalker. To put it delicately, go fuck your
>dog up the ass.
i can't even give you a 1 out of 10 for that one.
>Your penchant for melodrama is a constant source of gigglesome moments for
>me.
you get a 4 out of 10 here, but only for what i presume is a
deliberate attempt at hypocrisy.
>But alas, it serves only to piss everyone else off - therefore you can go
>back to were you belong.
sorry, assuming you haven't taken a poll, you can only have a 0 out of
10 for unsubstantiated facts.
>Stuck with your dick inserted into any orifice that's willing to give you
>the time of day, with a gag firmly wrapped around your pouty little mouth.
considering an orifice is a hole, and a hole has no substance, it
would be difficult for a hole to provide anything, and certainly not a
time of day. attempting a certain reality when dishing out gratuitous
insult, is always advised.
>So with a healthy *suck suck kiss ass* I bid you and your mother superior
a distinct lack of commas helped render your sentence wackified. the
lack of a full-stop nullified its impact altogether.
>*plonk*
for a bunch of people priding yourselves at insult technique and
arrogant form, so far you're failing miserably. go on, plonk me too
for not admiring your lack of any real thought behind your prose.
mister c of nine
wrote:
>That has to hold hands with a couple others because he's frightened of
>Telstra, CCA, Optus and OzEmail. In the infamous words of Rod Speed
>"Pathetic Really".
telstra. ozemail. optus.
hmmm.
i would like to know how many idiots there are in the world, so: hands
up those who would pay for accounts with those providers?
Jason Cornelius
news:381ee4f...@news.omen.net.au...
>
> some people are above such childish ideals as killfiling.
How I love the uninitiated.
Don't tell me, you're one of Deen's "129" butt fucking minions, correct?
If not, then I think you'll find that you are causing raucous laughter
amongst many people here at the thought of not actually killfiling the
hellspawn of Liberace's love-goat.
> i've also found that people who sit and cry about how, as a majority,
> they've killfiled so many people,
You don't understand.. We haven't killfiled "so many people", just Deen.
> and why hasn't everyone else
> followed suit, that the guy crying is actually a minority.
*snicker*
Deen could quite possibly be the first person in Usenet history to be in
more people's killfile than not.
And it doesn't take long for the few remaining people to tire of his
nonsensical monkey-chatter.
Jason.
Jason Cornelius
>
> >So with a healthy *suck suck kiss ass* I bid you and your mother superior
>
> a distinct lack of commas helped render your sentence wackified. the
> lack of a full-stop nullified its impact altogether.
Amazing.. I'm yet to see one capital letter in your posts, yet you fancy
yourself as a grammar teacher.
I'll leave it at that. I'm sure you can find some children that would admire
your method of thought and prose.
Take care, doll.
Jason.
mister c of nine
<ko...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>Amazing.. I'm yet to see one capital letter in your posts, yet you fancy
>yourself as a grammar teacher.
obviously you fancy yourself as a reader, yet you've not even read my
answer to such a thought. amazing.
>I'll leave it at that. I'm sure you can find some children that would admire
>your method of thought and prose.
my style of prose is not an error, nor a mistake. it is merely a
slight alteration of convention, which is valid in this
post-mderni-obsessed world.
if you were familiar with modern literary thought, you'd know that.
however, as i do not expect you to be, i was not disappointed with
your apparent superiority in the realm of grammar and punctuation.
however, were i extremely picky on everyone's grammatical perfection,
i would have pointed out that you have failed to correctly display an
ellipsis.
but, as i've often said, i only tend to pick on the mistakes of those
who seem intent on proving their own superiority through the assault
of others, especially when the person doing the attacking has not
fully grasped many of the concepts they are claiming they know inside
out.
needless to say, your opinion as to the relevence of capital letters
is blatantly clear, no matter how basic the proposition.
however, if you wish to discuss the relevent theories behind modern
literary form and structure, i will be happy to do so. until then,
consider first the possible validity of a style before dismissing it.
after all, an error is only an error when it is built on a foundation
of ignorance. anything else is deliberate, and probably has a reason.
mister c of nine
mister c of nine
<ko...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>How I love the uninitiated.
i admit to not being one who finds pride in the collecting of useless
blocking techniques, then applying them to people who disagree with
me, or who don't bow down and offer sexual favours.
>Don't tell me, you're one of Deen's "129" butt fucking minions, correct?
one thing i ahve noticed, is an obsession with anal-intercourse among
those who proclaim killfiling as god's gift to the internet. every
time i criticise the use of killfiling, it's amazing how many yell
"faggot", or make some such reference to my sexual preference.
>If not, then I think you'll find that you are causing raucous laughter
>amongst many people here at the thought of not actually killfiling the
>hellspawn of Liberace's love-goat.
hmmm. and you're obviously under the delusion that i seem to care
about your killfiling habits, and that i seem fearful of finding
myself on your list of doom. however, i find it amusing that you still
proclaim that 'everyone here', and 'many people here' are with you. i
see no one leaping to your defence, and there's not all that many if
they were. so, for you to place yourself in with the dominant majority
seems largely a product of your own ego, which seems to dwell
somewhere under the delusion of your own popularity and personality,
whereas the truth is that you seem as alone in this thread as i am.
>You don't understand.. We haven't killfiled "so many people", just Deen.
of course i understand. you killfiled him, and still abuse him by
piggy-backing other people's posts. you attack from behind the backs
of others, and find it amusing that you have killfiled his responses
to your attacks. how mature of you.
this does, unfortunately, rather limit the discussion to a single
point of view, but i've also discovered that those who appreciate the
killfiling of genuine posters as opposed to spammers, are also those
who just can't stand to be proven wrong.
>*snicker*
>Deen could quite possibly be the first person in Usenet history to be in
>more people's killfile than not.
>And it doesn't take long for the few remaining people to tire of his
>nonsensical monkey-chatter.
are you much better? i've yet to see a post involving anything
resembling thought come from your direction. of course, i may just
have been limited to your 'days off from thinking', and have yet to
see the level of your arguments, which is why i don't believe in
killfiling.
a few months ago, i argued with a guy in another group. he yelled at
my de-capitalisation, and claimed that there was no difference between
"your" and "you're" on the internet, and said criticism was to
describe plot development. had i 'plonked him' (in your witty
vernacular), i may have missed his subsequent apology some weeks
later, after he found more than one novel of worth which made use of
more than just decapitalisation.
after all, if we were all grammatically obsessive on here, we'd all
indent our paragraphs too.
but, of course, with a place like the internet, where there are so
many creative people, there are, unfortunately, also those who have no
idea as to the realities of creativity. i put it down to the amount of
computer-students online. they seem to judge literary reality by what
they read in textbooks.
nice one, guys, but unfortunately, that's a limited way to understand
english.
mister c of nine
<gu...@swami.pcguru.com.au> wrote:
>As much as I think you are an inconsequential prat, and as much as it
>irks me to agree with you.
>
as much as i think you're misguided, and have no experience with me to
base your argument as to my personality upon, i thank you.
i know i was right. i've been with omen longer than any other isp...
mister c of nine
<mre...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>Fuck off...
>
>Love and Kisses
i would, miss erryn binning, but it's you guys, as usual, who seem
intent to cross-post into our group. now, i know you'll say: then quit
it!
but we're giggling ourselves all over you guys, so we're not going to
make the first step. as they say, in that quaint old fashioned way:
ladies first.
what? no ladies here? oh well. bad-mouthed creatures first...
St. Chucky the Chunderous
wrote:
>PR..K Lardarse wrote:
>
>> I've run across one or two of the volunteers for APANA before, and
>> haven't been at all impressed with them, in character, logical ability,
>> or technical ability.
>
>Hahahahahahaha! You've completely lost the plot, if you ever had a plot
>to lose. Evidently.
Hee hee hee! You know him!
>If you base your entire opinion of an organisation on two people, you're
>clueless. That's like saying "PR..K Lardarse is clueless, therefore all
>of iiNet is". Sorry child, it isn't the case. Perhaps if you actually
>had the guts to say that to a few others, besides the two you refer to,
>you would be summarily fixed. I've seen countless APANA people who
>outperform you in the departments of technically, logically and
>character by 1000:1 against....you.
It doesn't take long to get a handle on Paul's 'character' - I choked
a bit on that very bold call myself - fancy Paul saying two people are
inferior - they MUST be bad. I have never known Paul to be anything
but the way he is - odious. So you can safely discount him. No cunt'll
buy him anyway.
>> Based on that, I wouldn't try, nor recommend others try, APANA.
>>
>> However, YMMV.
>
>Translated to English, you're wrong and you admit it.
>
>Regards,
>
>d.
Agreed. Paul judging someone as a loser according to character is like
a giraffe refusing to fuck another giraffe because its neck is too
long.
St. Chucky the Chunderous
<ko...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>mister c of nine <c...@omen.net.au> wrote in message
>news:381eec6d...@news.omen.net.au...
>>
>> >So with a healthy *suck suck kiss ass* I bid you and your mother superior
>>
>> a distinct lack of commas helped render your sentence wackified. the
>> lack of a full-stop nullified its impact altogether.
>
>Amazing.. I'm yet to see one capital letter in your posts, yet you fancy
>yourself as a grammar teacher.
>
>I'll leave it at that. I'm sure you can find some children that would admire
>your method of thought and prose.
>
>Take care, doll.
>Jason.
Look, Paul Raj has a friend!
Welcome, Jason. Can you keep a chain on your little killfiling
friends? They aren't house trained.
*blandly ignores the fact that Jason also is a killfiler*
St. Chucky the Chunderous
>mister c of nine <c...@omen.net.au> wrote in message
>news:381ef8df...@news.omen.net.au...
><chop>
>Off...
>Fuck off...
>
>Love and Kisses
>Erryn
I don't get it.
mister c of nine
Chunderous) wrote:
>I don't get it.
smart guy. when people talk sex, i always say: wear a condom, that way
you don't get anything...
mister c of nine
Chunderous) wrote:
>Agreed. Paul judging someone as a loser according to character is like
>a giraffe refusing to fuck another giraffe because its neck is too
>long.
pfft.
okay okay. 7 out of ten, with another point for rhythm.
St. Chucky the Chunderous
wrote:
>On Tue, 02 Nov 1999 17:53:56 +0800, Dean Hollister <de...@mushka.cx>
>wrote:
>
>>That has to hold hands with a couple others because he's frightened of
>>Telstra, CCA, Optus and OzEmail. In the infamous words of Rod Speed
>>"Pathetic Really".
>
>telstra. ozemail. optus.
>
>hmmm.
>
>i would like to know how many idiots there are in the world, so: hands
>up those who would pay for accounts with those providers?
*resounding silence*
mister c of nine
wrote:
>In the infamous words of Rod Speed
>"Pathetic Really".
and they pick on MY name...
Erryn Binning
Jason Cornelius
news:381f3483...@news.omen.net.au...
>
> It doesn't take long to get a handle on Paul's 'character' - I choked
> a bit on that very bold call myself - fancy Paul saying two people are
> inferior - they MUST be bad. I have never known Paul to be anything
> but the way he is - odious. So you can safely discount him. No cunt'll
> buy him anyway.
Gee, you don't know Paul very well then do you. And evidently you don't know
Deen very well either.
This is hilarious to me. People teaming with Deen, against people who do
nothing but balance out the mess people like Deen leave the gene pool in.
Deen is a floater. Nothing more.
I chuckle at you chuck.
What a wonderful judge of character you people are. I'm impressed.
Jason.
Jason Cornelius
>
> >Don't tell me, you're one of Deen's "129" butt fucking minions, correct?
>
> one thing i ahve noticed, is an obsession with anal-intercourse among
> those who proclaim killfiling as god's gift to the internet. every
> time i criticise the use of killfiling, it's amazing how many yell
> "faggot", or make some such reference to my sexual preference.
No, you misunderstand me. I'm not calling you a faggot at all.. Just a butt
fucker.
There's a difference.
You see, a homosexual - or as you like to put it, "faggot" - generally has
no say in the matter. They are born that way.
A "butt fucker" on the other hand, generally does it as a gesture of
gratitude to another *astoundingly* ugly individual for showing them some
form of interest.
In my experience, I've noticed that most homosexuals are actually pretty
good looking men that wouldn't have any trouble in attracting members of the
opposite sex - if they were that way inclined.
Also in my experience I've drawn the conclusion that "butt fuckers" are
usually such hideous specimens that they have trouble attracting their
neighbours "Great Dane" while it's on heat.
I have a sneaking suspicion that you are one of those Butt Fuckers that seek
out other hideous men that specifically suffer from haemorrhoids, so that
you can give your brain the mental stimulation of "popping a few cherries" -
albeit only through illusion.
I hope that has cleared up the matter with you. If not, feel free to call me
at (08)9455-1536 and we can discuss it further.
Jason.
mister c of nine
wrote:
>Nicely said!
i try...
>
>But don't count on the dizzy drama queen listening...he's run back off
>to his corner...alone.
i don't. but i've always thought it's best to respond to such
arguments in hope of educating the uninformed.
mister c of nine
<ko...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>What a wonderful judge of character you people are. I'm impressed.
hmm, i'd rewrite that first sentence if i were you.
but, to respond, we have had no experience with the person you seem to
dislike, as he has not cross-posted consistently to our group, so can
only base our opinions on the small posts he has made.
so, he has seemed rather ordinary, and hardly deserving of disdain.
you, on the other hand, have been consistently abusive, smarmy, and
seem to have a very firm grasp of your own ego. your sarcasm, however,
needs some improving, and perhaps some lessons in humour might help
you develop yourself as a person.
but, if you had read young st chucky's posts, you'd realise he doesn't
mind you chuckling at him.
mister c of nine
<ko...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>No, you misunderstand me. I'm not calling you a faggot at all.. Just a butt
>fucker.
>There's a difference.
interesting. i bet you're going to try talk yourself out of your
obvious feelings of inadequacy, and will attempt to proclaim you have
nothing against the homosexual community at all, despite the fact you
use them as a form of insult, regardless of the fact that you did not
ask me my sexual preference to begin with. how do you know i am not a
homosexual, in which case, your insult would mean nothing to me.
and, even if i weren't, would i take your opinion as evidence as to my
sexual preference?
>You see, a homosexual - or as you like to put it, "faggot" - generally has
>no say in the matter. They are born that way.
>A "butt fucker" on the other hand, generally does it as a gesture of
>gratitude to another *astoundingly* ugly individual for showing them some
>form of interest.
>In my experience, I've noticed that most homosexuals are actually pretty
>good looking men that wouldn't have any trouble in attracting members of the
>opposite sex - if they were that way inclined.
hmmm. you are obviously prone to mistaking stereotype for realism. i'd
suggest watching less television.
>Also in my experience I've drawn the conclusion that "butt fuckers" are
>usually such hideous specimens that they have trouble attracting their
>neighbours "Great Dane" while it's on heat.
apostrophes, guy. you should use them.
>I have a sneaking suspicion that you are one of those Butt Fuckers that seek
>out other hideous men that specifically suffer from haemorrhoids, so that
>you can give your brain the mental stimulation of "popping a few cherries" -
>albeit only through illusion.
hmmm. if all you wanted to do, was call me ugly, you could just say
so. pretending to disguise your insult in what you hoped was a witty
argument based on some well-thought presumption as to the realities of
homosexuality, based entirely upon what you've seen in american
sit-coms, only makes you look a little ridiculous, and not really very
funny at all. i couldn't even find one line which made me snigger.
>I hope that has cleared up the matter with you. If not, feel free to call me
>at (08)9455-1536 and we can discuss it further.
you give me a nice lecture on how i chase ugly guys in order to have
anal intercourse with them, and then you give me your phone number. if
you wanted me to have sex with your bottom, why didn't you just say
so?
St. Chucky the Chunderous
<ko...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
<snip amateur attempts at abuse>
I have a solution to this.
Delete local.wantree.surreal from your replies - I guarantee that we
will not leave our home newsgroup and hunt you down. You will never
hear from us again.
Or, you could continue cross-posting here as long as you like. You are
an interesting bunch of discordancies, and you entertain me a great
deal. And also you chuckle at me, a delicious pun on my name, whoever
said that. Nice as it was to see Paul Raj again, and listen to you all
dribble, this is it. You can continue to argue with us, or you can
leave our group in peace.
The choice is in your hands. You started this, you can end it when you
like. It's easy!
Jason Cornelius
>
> I have a solution to this.
>
> Delete local.wantree.surreal from your replies - I guarantee that we
> will not leave our home newsgroup and hunt you down. You will never
> hear from us again.
Nah.. I'd prefer you delete iinet.general from your replies. I can
absolutely, unequivocally say that no-one here will want to come and visit
you in your life-replacement group.
> You started this, you can end it when you like. It's easy!
I can assure you that not one of us came here asking about carrots. That had
to be one of your mob.
I enjoy watching you guys spout off rhetoric trying to look smart, as though
it's all you have in your life.
It's fun. The time you guys put into responding (multiple times to the same
post I might add) while the rest of us are out in the sun enjoying life
shows quite exceptional dedication on your behalf.
I commend you all... Really...
Jason.
St. Chucky the Chunderous
wrote:
>Go out unto all the world and let it be known that on this day Fri, 29
>Oct 1999 18:56:17 GMT a mysterious being known only as c...@omen.net.au
>(mister c of nine) escaped the abyss to utter the following foreboding
>words:
>
><snip>
>
>Aha! I just noticed the extra groups in the headers and now realise
>where these extremly alternative being came from.
"this extremely alternative being"
or
"these extremely alternative beings"
I prefer the latter. Alternative is cool. Not as cool as American
(right Paul?), but pretty cool anyway.....
>How odd. Are you both on medication ?
>
>Zac
Hee hee! Alternative....
I don't know why this happened - somebody crossposted and put Surreal
in the list (Rick, I think it was you), and then our posts started
appearing in your group(s). Regrettable.
I don't think we're going to do a recarts and move across the way we
did last time that so shat Paul - he didn't seem to realise that we
weren't new to recarts at all, but anyway - we're happy enough in our
little newsgroup, and we welcome the fun. It's really not our fault
that you happen to be reading this.
Medication? What a thing to suggest!
St. Chucky the Chunderous
<ko...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>Nah.. I'd prefer you delete iinet.general from your replies. I can
>absolutely, unequivocally say that no-one here will want to come and visit
>you in your life-replacement group.
Uh huh. Well how about I delete surreal from this reply? Then you can
ignore me!
>> You started this, you can end it when you like. It's easy!
>
>I can assure you that not one of us came here asking about carrots. That had
>to be one of your mob.
Um, Rick M I think.
>I enjoy watching you guys spout off rhetoric trying to look smart, as though
>it's all you have in your life.
You love watching that do you? Ha ha
>It's fun. The time you guys put into responding (multiple times to the same
>post I might add) while the rest of us are out in the sun enjoying life
>shows quite exceptional dedication on your behalf.
Sitting in the sun enjoying life? That's what I've been missing!
Sunlight!
I've been nocturnal since 1996. It is conducive to my social life.
*waits for the inevitable juvenile jeers*
>I commend you all... Really...
>
>Jason.
Ah!
Very clever indeed. I wish I'd thought of lowering myself to the point
where I say "Any response you come up with is just going to prove that
you have no life."
That's very clever.
St. Chucky the Chunderous
<ko...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
<snip no-life-accusation>
Oh dear, I have responded twice. No life me. Um, I forgot to delete us
from the heading line - now, this is the thread you can respond to if
you must - the other one will keep cross posting and if you want this
to end, I don't advise doing that.
mister c of nine
<ko...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>Nah.. I'd prefer you delete iinet.general from your replies. I can
>absolutely, unequivocally say that no-one here will want to come and visit
>you in your life-replacement group.
but we're only replying to you. we wouldn't have to, if you hadn't
posted into our group.
>I can assure you that not one of us came here asking about carrots. That had
>to be one of your mob.
*beep*
there's only two of us in surreal. we consider it our private little
hidey hole.
>I enjoy watching you guys spout off rhetoric trying to look smart, as though
>it's all you have in your life.
we're not smart. we're just logical.
>It's fun. The time you guys put into responding (multiple times to the same
>post I might add) while the rest of us are out in the sun enjoying life
>shows quite exceptional dedication on your behalf.
in the sun? poor you. do you do that thing? what is it? begins with a
'w'? something to do with doing stuff you don't want to do?
>I commend you all... Really...
oh, we applaude your very smart reply.
mister c of nine
Chunderous) wrote:
>Very clever indeed. I wish I'd thought of lowering myself to the point
>where I say "Any response you come up with is just going to prove that
>you have no life."
>
>That's very clever.
actually, chuck, i's never bothered me. i get the last laugh, after
all. it's not me doing the job thing, or the study thing. i just get
to sit here day in day out (well, night in night out) and just kinda,
well, hang out til morning, and go to sleep when the sun comes up.
relaxing in the sun, huh? sounds pretty.
hmmm. 4.25am. nice night out there. breeze is pretty. why anyone would
want to sleep right now is so far beyond me...
Rick M.
> >> You started this, you can end it when you like. It's easy!
>
> >I can assure you that not one of us came here asking about carrots. That had
> >to be one of your mob.
>
> Um, Rick M I think.
one of your mob?
I'm afraid I'm just a happy carrot muncher with no affiliations.
And I find it interesting that the only useful reply I got about carrot
detection (though I was actually after non-consuming grading techniques)
came from the surreal group and not the den of illuminati that is
iinet.general ...
and I guess it's even stranger that the vegie group said nothing though
perhaps they are showing their renowned anti-aggressive nature by
refraining from entering this 'discussion'.
ha ha I'm joking you guys are somewhat entertaining and I admit I like
the passion with which you post. It's nice to see such emotion! :P
However if you guys are getting bored now Id be very happy to talk about
sport cars as thats something I feel passionately about! perhaps we could
include carrots and anal references (I'm surprised that connection hasn't
been used in an insult yet, though perhaps it has and I missed it as I'm
a bit preoccupied checking for missing apostrophes -mmm just kidding st
chucky! )
Rick M.
( who hopes to draw the vegs into things *saintly grin* )
Paul Raj Khangure
: And I find it interesting that the only useful reply I got about carrot
: detection (though I was actually after non-consuming grading techniques)
: came from the surreal group
: and I guess it's even stranger that the vegie group said nothing though
Make up your mind.
Either the surreal group said something, or they said nothing.
Which leads to the question of whether vegetables can actually say
something?
The answer of course being, only in surreal worlds.
Paul Raj Khangure
--
I stayed up all last night playing poker with tarot cards.
I got a full house and four people died.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
St. Chucky the Chunderous
>> Um, Rick M I think.
>
>one of your mob?
Apologies Rick - it's just that it wasn't Mister C or I, and you are
the only other poster at this Newsgroup. I don't mean to offend.
<snip>
>and I guess it's even stranger that the vegie group said nothing though
>perhaps they are showing their renowned anti-aggressive nature by
>refraining from entering this 'discussion'.
Too busy testing this ground-breaking new theory, is my guess.....
>ha ha I'm joking you guys are somewhat entertaining and I admit I like
>the passion with which you post. It's nice to see such emotion! :P
Who was being emotional? *Vulcan voice*
>However if you guys are getting bored now Id be very happy to talk about
>sport cars as thats something I feel passionately about! perhaps we could
>include carrots and anal references (I'm surprised that connection hasn't
>been used in an insult yet, though perhaps it has and I missed it as I'm
>a bit preoccupied checking for missing apostrophes -mmm just kidding st
>chucky! )
Thats okay I didnt mind its not like I havent wondered where all the
apostrophes have been getting to - its distressing isnt it?
>Rick M.
>( who hopes to draw the vegs into things *saintly grin* )
One more of those Saintly grins and I'll draw a vege into
SOMETHING......
mister c of nine
>However if you guys are getting bored now Id be very happy to talk about
>sport cars as thats something I feel passionately about! perhaps we could
>include carrots and anal references
i know nothing of these things you call sports cars.
>(I'm surprised that connection hasn't
>been used in an insult yet, though perhaps it has and I missed it as I'm
>a bit preoccupied checking for missing apostrophes -mmm just kidding st
>chucky! )
oh, we'd have done it, but we're above that kind of thing....
(also i don't think we had our minds on our bottoms. i'm surprised,
now you mention it, that these other guys hadn't done that one... they
seem impressed with bottoms.)
Marj
dont know if ud feel disgusted but here in holland we eat it like
of course pare it, sliced it into sticks like then boil it then drain
then sprinkle some sugar
taste so nice :) and of course sweet :)
"Rick M." wrote:
> This is a question thats been bugging me for years.
> I like to know how to tell if a carrot is sweet or bitter from just
> looking at it.
> I like my vegies but i only like sweet carrots.
> And don't say the small ones are sweet cause that not always true and
> some big ones are sweet also!
> Thanks Regards,
> Rick M.
mister c of nine
>hi
>
>dont know if ud feel disgusted but here in holland we eat it like
>of course pare it, sliced it into sticks like then boil it then drain
>then sprinkle some sugar
>taste so nice :) and of course sweet :)
sweeter than a young gir-
oh, never mind.
i like mine raw.
my carrots too.
mister c of nine
<NOS...@zcs.net.au> unzipped its fly, squatted close, and released
this expert opinion:
>Go out unto all the world and let it be known that on this day Sat, 30
>Oct 1999 15:27:52 GMT a mysterious being known only as c...@omen.net.au
>(mister c of nine) escaped the abyss to utter the following foreboding
>words:
>
>>bwahahahahahaha! ANOTHER ONE!!!!
>>MORE MORE MORE!!!!
>
>You guys don't go to West Busselton Primary do you? I'm damn sure I've
>seen you in one fo their special Ed classes.
you've been following me into the school toilets and demanding sexual
favours. welcome to my killfile.
*plonk*
hee hee