New Mexico Trademark Documents Filed LNC Members, The attached documents were filed earlier today in the New Mexico trademark litigation by our trademark council and sent to me shortly

for Michigan Litigation I withdraw my “yes” vote. Travis L. Bost LNC At-Large Travis.Bost@LP.org ________________________________ From: Andrew Watkins Sent: Monday, April 27

with the Litigation Committee and Party counsel, I am no longer pursuing this specific course of action to reserve funds for litigation. I will instead make preparations for an alternative

the party litigation expenses. . . But then when the issue is switched these parties seem to flip flop just like the Republicrats. . . So let me know what you think, because I know what my

- Execute Fresh IP Retainer Motion passes. Sincerely, Steven Nekhaila Chairman, LNC ________________________________ From: Evan McMahon Sent: Saturday, April 4, 2026 11:38:

________________________________ From: Bryce Thon Sent: Friday, April 3, 2026 2:28:40 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik To: Steven Nekhaila ; Andrew

01EC Execute Trademark Retainer Oops. . .I apologize for voting in the wrong thread. Mimi Robson LNC Region 4 Alternate lp.org | mimi.robson@lp.org ________________________________

to initiate litigation is required by the PM. This is why we had a recent Excom meeting to discuss litigation instead of those items being on the agenda for the LNC meeting. Andrew Watkins

Increase/Fresh IP Mr. Chair, Thank you for bringing this motion forward. The New Mexico trademark litigation is a critical obligation of this organization, and I am glad to see it moving

New Mexico Trademark Litigation Mr. Chadderdon, The ExCom exceeded its authority by approving the motion for Fresh IP while there was a -$2500 deficit on that line item (needed $20

and a litigation committee was formed to carry out the process of finding and retaining attorneys, even the Chair of the affiliate was included. The action was the creation of a litigation