for Michigan Litigation Nay Doug Knebel LNC Director At-Large ________________________________ From: Paul Darr Sent: Friday, April 24, 2026 8:59 PM To: Sam Bohler ; Steven Nekhaila

with the Litigation Committee and Party counsel, I am no longer pursuing this specific course of action to reserve funds for litigation. I will instead make preparations for an alternative

the party litigation expenses. . . But then when the issue is switched these parties seem to flip flop just like the Republicrats. . . So let me know what you think, because I know what my

- Execute Fresh IP Retainer Motion passes. Sincerely, Steven Nekhaila Chairman, LNC ________________________________ From: Evan McMahon Sent: Saturday, April 4, 2026 11:38:

________________________________ From: Bryce Thon Sent: Friday, April 3, 2026 2:28:40 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik To: Steven Nekhaila ; Andrew

01EC Execute Trademark Retainer Oops. . .I apologize for voting in the wrong thread. Mimi Robson LNC Region 4 Alternate lp.org | mimi.robson@lp.org ________________________________

to initiate litigation is required by the PM. This is why we had a recent Excom meeting to discuss litigation instead of those items being on the agenda for the LNC meeting. Andrew Watkins

Increase/Fresh IP Mr. Chair, Thank you for bringing this motion forward. The New Mexico trademark litigation is a critical obligation of this organization, and I am glad to see it moving

New Mexico Trademark Litigation Mr. Chadderdon, The ExCom exceeded its authority by approving the motion for Fresh IP while there was a -$2500 deficit on that line item (needed $20

and a litigation committee was formed to carry out the process of finding and retaining attorneys, even the Chair of the affiliate was included. The action was the creation of a litigation