Members of the LNC,
I draw the body's attention to Policy 1.07, Subsection 4.C.III of our Policy Manual (August 10, 2025), which states our Fiduciary Duty of Loyalty:
"Duty of Loyalty: LNC members shall make decisions in the best interest of the corporation in the advancement of its mission, and
not in the best interest of individual board members. LNC members shall take the utmost care to avoid any conflicts of interest that could jeopardize their ability to act in the best interest of the LNC. An LNC member must take steps to avoid personal
economic conflicts when managing the assets of the LNC. LNC members should not personally benefit from the decisions they make regarding the assets and property held by the LNC and shall avoid putting themselves in a position where their individual
interests clash with the interests of the LNC. LNC members must manage the LNC solely in its best interest, not use it as a vehicle for promoting their personal beliefs or causes."
A majority of this body has just voted not to reject the SIC report, but to prevent the question from even being discussed. Among those voting to block consideration was Mr. Redpath himself, the very member whose concealed conflict of interest is the primary
basis for the motion. His participation in blocking that examination is precisely the kind of conflict our Duty of Loyalty policy exists to prevent.
I further note that several other members who voted to block consideration were present at the time of Mr. Redpath's admission and were directly aware of his conflict. Rather than act on that knowledge, they have consistently voted to shield the SIC report
from scrutiny. A recording of the admission in question is available here:
I ask each member of this body to consider whether the votes cast today were made in the best interest of the Libertarian Party, or in the interest of the individuals whose conduct the motion sought to examine.
Respectfully,