FW: Ruling in LPNH vs LNC

129 views
Skip to first unread message

lnc-public_forward

unread,
Aug 18, 2026, 11:19:24 PM (3 days ago) Aug 18
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
 

From: Amanda Griffiths <amanda.g...@lp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2026 3:19:09 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: LNC Public <lnc-p...@lp.org>; lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Fw: Ruling in LPNH vs LNC

All,

Below, please find the Judicial Committee's ruling on the National Committee's disaffiliation of New Hampshire.


In Liberty,

Amanda
Vice Chair, National Libertarian Party


From: ken.mo...@lpstates.com <ken.mo...@lpstates.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2026 22:12
To: Vice Chair <vice...@lp.org>; vice-...@lp.org <vice-...@lp.org>
Subject: Fwd: Ruling in LPNH vs LNC


-------- Original Message --------


Gentlemen,

This is my first available time to contact those who are to be contacted, and as such I am doing so now.

After deliberation in executive session, the Judicial Committee rose at 9:57PM on August 17, 2026 (last night) to consider the question in the matter of the disaffiliation of the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire. The vote was conducted as a roll call vote.  

Shall the National Committee's revocation of affiliate party status of the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire be affirmed, or shall the Judicial Committee order reinstatement of the affiliate party?

The vote was 7-0-0 to affirm the decision of the LNC.

There are no fewer than 4 written opinions of which I am aware that are in progress. All written opinions are due to be published no later than Sept 11, 2026. 

There is additionally a document that is being finalized to explain the process of the appointments to the Judicial Committee, including a full history of the bylaws which enabled that process. It is not a ruling or decision, as a committee is not able to decide on its own legitimacy. The only body which can make such a determination is the appointing body, which would be a national convention body.

Thank you,

Ken Moellman
Chair, Judicial Committee


lnc-public_forward

unread,
Aug 19, 2026, 9:28:08 PM (2 days ago) Aug 19
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
 

From: Barbara Engelhardt <barbara.e...@lp.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2026 1:27:57 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Amanda Griffiths <amanda.g...@lp.org>; LNC Public <lnc-p...@lp.org>; lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: Ruling in LPNH vs LNC

There is nothing attached for me.

Barbara Engelhardt 
LNC Reg 4 Alt Rep

From: Amanda Griffiths <amanda.g...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2026 8:19 PM

lnc-public_forward

unread,
Aug 19, 2026, 9:29:27 PM (2 days ago) Aug 19
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
 

From: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2026 1:29:20 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Barbara Engelhardt <barbara.e...@lp.org>; Amanda Griffiths <amanda.g...@lp.org>; LNC Public <lnc-p...@lp.org>; lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>

Subject: Re: Ruling in LPNH vs LNC

There was nothing to be attracted. Click the dots under Amanda's name to see the forwarded email.

Evan

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, an AT&T 5G smartphone
Get Outlook for Android

From: Barbara Engelhardt <barbara.e...@lp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 19 August 2026 21:27:57

lnc-public_forward

unread,
Aug 19, 2026, 9:35:22 PM (2 days ago) Aug 19
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
 

From: Barbara Engelhardt <barbara.e...@lp.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2026 1:35:14 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Amanda Griffiths <amanda.g...@lp.org>; LNC Public <lnc-p...@lp.org>; lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>

Subject: Re: Ruling in LPNH vs LNC

Aha. Thank you.

From: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2026 6:29 PM
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages