FW: Fiduciary Issues and inappropriate appointments
88 views
Skip to first unread message
lnc-public_forward
Jun 26, 2026, 3:11:53 PMJun 26
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2026 7:11:42 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>; lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Cc: nciesi...@gmail.com <nciesi...@gmail.com>
Subject: Fiduciary Issues and inappropriate appointments
Aloha!
This is a genuinely good point.
One issue not addressed is that there is actually more than one person on this committee which was strongly implicated by the forensic investigation as having been involved in the theft and alleged misuse of our database.
My understanding that CATO and the other NGO principles sponsored this action against the Libertarian Party as part of their hostile takeover. These same operatives are also actively working with Luchini to subvert our interests in New Mexico — all directly
tied back to the CATO / Atlas & Liberal Party NGO ecosystem.
What a betrayal of member trust!!
Now we are openly appointing known hostile institutional saboteurs to other committees. The conflicted officers and appointments have been brought up many times to our counsel, and was met with his seal of approval; concerns dismissed, conflicts ignored — why
is our lawyer facilitating this apparently criminal behavior?
Make it make sense.
Austin Martin
R1
Ua mau ke ea o ka ʻāina i ka pono
From: in...@lp.org <in...@lp.org>
Sent: Friday, 26 June 2026 08:49:32
To: Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Subject: New message from Contact the LNC - Contact the Entire LNC
Sent: Friday, 26 June 2026 08:49:32
To: Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Subject: New message from Contact the LNC - Contact the Entire LNC
The following message has been submitted via the Contact the LNC webform.
Nick Ciesielski (nciesi...@gmail.com) writes:
Members of the LNC,
I noticed the announcement of members of the historical preservation committee on the email list today and noticed one appointment that gives me cause for concern. One of the members newly appointed to this committee has been credibly determined by an outside vendor to have exported party membership data, which I believe required party insurance to get involved and a public notification of a data leak to be issued in some states. While I’m not sure what data the historical preservation committee may or may not have access to, it seems highly improper for somebody who has been identified as the perpetrator of such an action to have any officially appointed role within the party. I’d even argue allowing this could be seen as a breach of fiduciary duty, being that the individual in question already has a history of improperly using party data. I ask you all to take this seriously and consider the implications of allowing this individual to hold a position on this committee or any committee in the future.
I noticed the announcement of members of the historical preservation committee on the email list today and noticed one appointment that gives me cause for concern. One of the members newly appointed to this committee has been credibly determined by an outside vendor to have exported party membership data, which I believe required party insurance to get involved and a public notification of a data leak to be issued in some states. While I’m not sure what data the historical preservation committee may or may not have access to, it seems highly improper for somebody who has been identified as the perpetrator of such an action to have any officially appointed role within the party. I’d even argue allowing this could be seen as a breach of fiduciary duty, being that the individual in question already has a history of improperly using party data. I ask you all to take this seriously and consider the implications of allowing this individual to hold a position on this committee or any committee in the future.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages